No Morality, No Self : : Anscombe’s Radical Skepticism / / James Doyle.
Elizabeth Anscombe’s “Modern Moral Philosophy” and “The First Person” have become touchstones of analytic philosophy but their significance remains controversial or misunderstood. James Doyle offers a fresh interpretation of Anscombe’s theses about ethical reasoning and individual identity that reco...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2017 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2018] ©2017 |
Year of Publication: | 2018 |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (224 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- PART ONE: No Morality: “Modern Moral Philosophy” (1958)
- 1. Virtue Ethics, Eudaimonism, and the Greeks
- 2. The Invention of “ Morality” and the Possibility of Consequentialism
- 3. The Misguided Project of Vindicating Morality
- 4. The Futility of Seeking the Extension of a Word with No Intension
- 5. What’s Really Wrong with the Vocabulary of Morality?
- 6. Assessing “Modern Moral Philosophy”
- PART TWO: No Self: “The First Person” (1975)
- 7. The Circularity Problem for Accounts of “I” as a Device of Self-Reference
- 8. Is the Fundamental Reference Rule for “I” the Key to Explaining First-Person Self-Reference?
- 9. Rumfitt’s Solution to the Circularity Problem
- 10. Can We Make Sense of a Nonreferential Account of “I”?
- 11. Strategies for Saving “I” as a Singular Term: Domesticating FP and Deflating Reference
- Epilogue: The Anti-Cartesian Basis of Anscombe’s Skepticism
- APPENDIX A. Aquinas and Natural Law
- APPENDIX B. Stoic Ethics: A Law Conception without Commandments?
- Notes
- References
- Acknowledgments
- Index