No Morality, No Self : : Anscombe’s Radical Skepticism / / James Doyle.

Elizabeth Anscombe’s “Modern Moral Philosophy” and “The First Person” have become touchstones of analytic philosophy but their significance remains controversial or misunderstood. James Doyle offers a fresh interpretation of Anscombe’s theses about ethical reasoning and individual identity that reco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Harvard University Press Complete eBook-Package 2017
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Cambridge, MA : : Harvard University Press, , [2018]
©2017
Year of Publication:2018
Language:English
Online Access:
Physical Description:1 online resource (224 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Frontmatter
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • PART ONE: No Morality: “Modern Moral Philosophy” (1958)
  • 1. Virtue Ethics, Eudaimonism, and the Greeks
  • 2. The Invention of “ Morality” and the Possibility of Consequentialism
  • 3. The Misguided Project of Vindicating Morality
  • 4. The Futility of Seeking the Extension of a Word with No Intension
  • 5. What’s Really Wrong with the Vocabulary of Morality?
  • 6. Assessing “Modern Moral Philosophy”
  • PART TWO: No Self: “The First Person” (1975)
  • 7. The Circularity Problem for Accounts of “I” as a Device of Self-Reference
  • 8. Is the Fundamental Reference Rule for “I” the Key to Explaining First-Person Self-Reference?
  • 9. Rumfitt’s Solution to the Circularity Problem
  • 10. Can We Make Sense of a Nonreferential Account of “I”?
  • 11. Strategies for Saving “I” as a Singular Term: Domesticating FP and Deflating Reference
  • Epilogue: The Anti-Cartesian Basis of Anscombe’s Skepticism
  • APPENDIX A. Aquinas and Natural Law
  • APPENDIX B. Stoic Ethics: A Law Conception without Commandments?
  • Notes
  • References
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index