Ending social promotion without leaving children behind : the case of New York City / / Jennifer Sloan McCombs, Sheila Nataraj Kirby, Louis T. Mariano, editors.
The New York City Department of Education asked RAND to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of its 5th-grade promotion policy. The findings of that study, conducted between March 2006 and August 2009, provide a comprehensive view of the policy's implementation and its impact on stude...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | RAND Corporation monograph series |
|---|---|
| : | |
| TeilnehmendeR: | |
| Year of Publication: | 2010 |
| Edition: | 1st ed. |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Rand Corporation monograph series.
|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (309 p.) |
| Notes: | Description based upon print version of record. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 03890nam a22005774a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 993628393604498 | ||
| 005 | 20240506060242.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 090821s2010 caua ob 000 0 eng | ||
| 010 | |z 2009032280 | ||
| 020 | |a 0-8330-4940-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (CKB)2670000000014543 | ||
| 035 | |a (EBL)510398 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)593351441 | ||
| 035 | |a (SSID)ssj0000337222 | ||
| 035 | |a (PQKBManifestationID)11260832 | ||
| 035 | |a (PQKBTitleCode)TC0000337222 | ||
| 035 | |a (PQKBWorkID)10288425 | ||
| 035 | |a (PQKB)10671436 | ||
| 035 | |a (Au-PeEL)EBL510398 | ||
| 035 | |a (CaPaEBR)ebr10375774 | ||
| 035 | |a (MiAaPQ)EBC510398 | ||
| 035 | |a (EXLCZ)992670000000014543 | ||
| 040 | |a MiAaPQ |c MiAaPQ |d MiAaPQ | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 043 | |a n-us-ny | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a LB3063 |b .M285 2010 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 371.2/8097471 |2 22 |
| 100 | 1 | |a McCombs, Jennifer Sloan, |d 1970- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ending social promotion without leaving children behind |h [electronic resource] : |b the case of New York City / |c Jennifer Sloan McCombs, Sheila Nataraj Kirby, Louis T. Mariano, editors. |
| 250 | |a 1st ed. | ||
| 260 | |a Santa Monica, CA : |b RAND, |c 2010. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (309 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a RAND Corporation monograph series | |
| 500 | |a Description based upon print version of record. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Cover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; CHAPTER ONE - Introduction; The Current Study; Contribution of the Study; Terminology; Organization of This Monograph; CHAPTER TWO - What We Know About the Effects of Grade Retention and Implementation of Promotion Policies; Methods; Characteristics of Retained Students; Effects of Grade Retention on Students' Academic and Nonacademic Outcomes; Effect of Supportive Components of Promotion Policies on Student Achievement; Summary | |
| 505 | 8 | |a CHAPTER THREE - Context and Conceptual Framework for Understanding New York City's Promotion Policy New York City's Reform Initiative; Conceptual Framework; Major Research Questions; Summary; CHAPTER FOUR - Data and Methods; Data; Methods; Study Limitations; Summary; CHAPTER FIVE - School-Provided Support for Students: Academic Intervention Services; CHAPTER SIX - Implementation of the Policy: Saturday and Summer Schools; CHAPTER SEVEN - Performance of 5th Graders in New York City and Overall Performance Trends in New York State | |
| 505 | 8 | |a CHAPTER EIGHT - Measuring the Effect of Supportive Interventions on Proximal-Year Student Achievement CHAPTER NINE - Future Outcomes of Students at Risk of Retention; CHAPTER TEN - The Impact of New York City's Promotion Policy on Students' Socioemotional Status; CHAPTER ELEVEN - Conclusions and Policy Implications; APPENDIX A - Technical Appendix for Achievement Models; APPENDIX B - Supporting Data for Chapter Five; APPENDIX C - Supporting Data for Chapter Seven; APPENDIX D - Supporting Data for Chapter Ten; APPENDIX E - Data and Analyses for 3rd-Grade Cohorts; References | |
| 520 | |a The New York City Department of Education asked RAND to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of its 5th-grade promotion policy. The findings of that study, conducted between March 2006 and August 2009, provide a comprehensive view of the policy's implementation and its impact on student outcomes, particularly for students at risk of retention and those who were retained in grade. | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-273). | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Promotion (School) |z New York (State) |z New York |v Case studies. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Grade repetition |z New York (State) |z New York |v Case studies. | |
| 776 | |z 0-8330-4778-7 | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Kirby, Sheila Nataraj, |d 1946- | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mariano, Louis T. | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Rand Corporation monograph series. | |
| 906 | |a BOOK | ||
| ADM | |b 2024-05-07 00:52:46 Europe/Vienna |f system |c marc21 |a 2012-02-26 02:52:30 Europe/Vienna |g false | ||
| AVE | |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5350477430004498&Force_direct=true |Z 5350477430004498 |b Available |8 5350477430004498 | ||