Ethics in Action : : Personal Reflections of Canadian Psychologists / / ed. by M.A. Suzie Bisson, Carole Sinclair, Ivana Djuraskovic.

• MitwirkendeR: Adams, Eric M.,; Akazaki, R. Lee,; Albert, Richard,; Anglin, Howard,; Atkin, Lord,; Baker, Dennis,; Bateman, Thomas M. J.,; Biro, Peter L.,; Blackett, Glenn,; Borovoy, Alan,; Borrows, John,; Brodie, Ian,; Cameron, Jamie,; Carlson, Kirsten Matoy,; Chouinard, Stéphanie,; Cossman, Brenda,; Craig, Elaine,; Crandall, Erin,; Dell, Brendan,; Dicey, A. V.,; Do, Minh,; Downie, Jocelyn,; Evans, Rhonda,; Fine, Sean,; Harding, Mark,; Heuser, Lauren,; Honickman, Asher,; Horowitz, Donald L.,; Irvine, Andrew David,; Jefferson, Thomas,; Joyal, Glenn D.,; Kennedy, Gerard,; Kirkup, Kyle,; Knopff, Rainer,; Koshan, Jennifer,; Ladner, Kiera,; Larocque, François,; Laskin, Bora,; Leckey, Robert,; Lederman, W. R.,; Locke, John,; Macfarlane, Emmett,; Mandel, Michael,; Manfredi, Christopher P.,; Mathen, Carissima,; Morton, F. L.,; Morton, Ted,; Newman, Dwight,; Nicolaides, Eleni,; Patzer, Jeremy,; Post, C. Gordon,; Puddister, Kate,; Razack, Sherene,; Roach, Kent W.,; Rothstein, Marshall,; Russell, Peter H.,; Sankey, Lord,; Schertzer, Robert,; Sigalet, Geoffrey,; Sirota, Leonid,; Smiley, Donald,; Snow, Dave,; Song, Daniel,; Voth, Daniel,; Weiler, Paul,; Wilson, Bertha,; Woolley, Alice,
• HerausgeberIn: Bisson, M.A. Suzie,; Djuraskovic, Ivana,; Sinclair, Carole,
• Place / Publishing House: Calgary, Alberta : : University of Calgary Press, , [2024]; ©2024
• Year of Publication: 2024
• Language: English
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (536 p.) :; 4 illustrations

Psychologists face ethical and cultural intricacies in their work on a daily basis. Psychology graduate training and continuing education programs often focus mainly on common ethical issues and mainstream psychological services and settings. Although this provides a wealth of valuable information,...

Table of Contents

• Frontmatter
• Table of Contents
• Preface to the New Edition
• 1 The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution
• Introduction
• 1.1 Roncarelli v. Duplessis
• 1.2 Of the Extent of the Legislative Power
• 1.3 The Declaration of Independence
• 1.4 The Rule of Law
• 1.5 Strong- and Weak-Form Judicial Review
• 1.6 Principles to Ensure the Law is Not Abused in Canada
• 1.7 Liberal versus Post-Liberal Constitutionalism: Applying the Charter to Civil Society
• 1.8 Key Terms
• 2 The Canadian Judicial System
• Introduction
• 2.1 The Role and Functions of Final Appellate Courts: The Supreme Court of Canada
• 2.2 Constitution Act, 1867, Sections 96–101
• 2.3 The Canadian Judicial System
• 2.4 The Criminal and Civil Court Processes
• 2.5 Key Terms
• 3 Precedents, Legal Reasoning, and Judicial Decision-Making
• Introduction
• 3.1 Two Models of Judicial Decision-Making
• 3.2 Harrison v. Carswell
• 3.3 Stare Decisis: The Use of Precedents
• 3.4 Architect of the Common Law
• 3.5 Fact Finding in Adjudication
• 3.6 Judicial Review and Civil Liberties
• 3.7 Checks and Balances in Constitutional Interpretation
• 3.8 Originalism: It’s Not What You Think
• 3.9 Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada
• 3.10 Studying Judicial Behaviour
• 3.11 Key Terms
• 4 Judicial Recruitment and Selection
• Introduction
• 4.1 The Politics of Reforming Judicial Appointments
• 4.2 A Reflection of Canadian Society? An Analysis of Federal Appointments to Provincial Superior Courts by the Liberal Government of Justin Trudeau
• 4.3 Elevating Language Over All Other Forms of Diversity
• 4.4 Bilingualism and Diversity: The Supreme Court Can— and Should—Have Both
• 4.5 The Honourable Michelle O’Bonsawin’s Questionnaire
• 4.6 Will Women Judges Really Make a Difference?
• 4.7 Key Terms
• 5 Judicial Independence, Ethics, and Discipline
• Introduction
• 5.1 The Independence of the Judiciary
• 5.2 The McClung Affair
• 5.3 A Self-Harming of Judicial Independence: The Legacy of the Inquiry into Lori Douglas
• 5.4 The Inquiry into Justice Robin Camp
• 5.5 For Judge ‘Knees Together’ Camp: Education Is power
• 5.6 Bad People Make Bad Judges
• 5.7 The Resignation of Supreme Court Justice Russell Brown
• 5.8 The Challenge of Judging Supreme Court of Canada Judges
• 5.9 The Use of Former Supreme Court Justices by Governments: Assessing the Dangers
• 5.10 By Staying on Hong Kong Court, Beverley McLachlin Follows the Wrong ‘Principle’
• 5.11 Key Terms
• 6 Interest Groups and Access to Judicial Power
• Introduction
• 6.1 The Canadian Reference Power
• 6.2 Interventions and the Public Interest
• 6.3 The Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund
• 6.4 The Policy Consequences of LEAF’s Legal Mobilization
• 6.5 Interventions at the Supreme Court of Canada
• 6.6 Defending the Court Challenges Program
• 6.7 The Court Challenges Program Rises Once Again
• 6.8 The SNC Lavalin Controversy: The Shawcross Principle and Prosecutorial Independence
• 6.9 Wokeness Captures Alberta’s Law Society
• 6.10 Shameful Backlash to Lawyers’ Indigenous Culture Course Shows Why We Need It
• 6.11 Key Terms
• 7 Judicial Review and Federalism
• Introduction
• 7.1 The “Living Tree” Approach to Interpreting the BNA Act
• 7.2 The “Watertight Compartments” Approach to Interpreting the BNA Act
• 7.3 The Anti-Inflation Case: The Anatomy of a Constitutional Decision
• 7.4 Re Constitution of Canada, 1981: The Patriation Reference
• 7.5 The Exemplar of the Secession Reference
• 7.6 Criminal Law, Federalism, and Assisted Reproduction
• 7.7 What the Supreme Court’s Carbon Tax Ruling Means
• 7.8 R. v. Comeau: The Scope of Trade Between Provinces and s. 121
• 7.9 Key Terms
• 8 Indigenous Law and the Judicial Process
• Introduction
• 8.1 Political Failure, Judicial Opportunity: The Supreme Court of Canada and Aboriginal and Treaty Rights
• 8.2 The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot’in v. British Columbia
• 8.3 Is the Sky the Limit? Aboriginal Legal Rights in Resource Development
• 8.4 The Duty to Consult and Reconciliation: The Supreme Court’s Idea of the Purpose and Practice of Consulting Indigenous Peoples
• 8.5 Her Majesty’s Justice Be Done: Métis Legal Mobilization and the Pitfalls to Indigenous Political Movement Building
• 8.6 Charting Unknown Waters: Indigenous Rights and the Charter at Forty
• 8.7 Key Terms
• 9 Courts, Partisanship, and Politics
• Introduction
• 9.1 Packing the Supreme Court
• 9.2 Much Ado About Little
• 9.3 Marc Nadon and the New Politics of Judicial Appointment
• 9.4 Stephen Harper v. Beverley McLachlin
• 9.5 Is the Liberal Party the Charter Party?
• 9.6 Canada’s Supreme Court Is Off-Balance as ‘Large and Liberal’ Consensus on the Charter Falls Apart
• 9.7 Why ‘Liberal’ and ‘Conservative’ Are Unhelpful Terms in Canadian Courts
• 9.8 Key Terms
• 10 Reconciling Judicial Review and Constitutional Democracy
• Introduction
• 10.1 Courts, Legislatures, and the Protection of Human Rights
• 10.2 What’s Wrong with the Charter Revolution and the Court Party?
• 10.3 The Charter Revolution and the Clash of Constitutionalisms
• 10.4 Robust Public Debate Needed on Use of Notwithstanding Clause
• 10.5 Notwithstanding Judicial Benediction: Why We Need to Dispel the Myths around Section 33 of the Charter
• 10.6 Dialogue or Monologue? Hogg and Thornton versus Morton
• 10.7 Checking the Court: Justifying Parliament’s Role in Constitutional Interpretation
• 10.8 40 Years On, Canada’s Charter of Rights Is a Beacon to the World
• 10.9 After 40 years, the Charter Is Still One of the Worst Bargains in Canadian History
• 10.10 The Charter and Canada’s New Political Culture: Are We All Ambassadors Now?
• 10.11 Key Terms
• Appendices
• A Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 91–95, 133
• B Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960
• C Constitution Act, 1982
• D Online Resources
• Index