Mining and materiality : : neolithic chalk artefacts and their depositional contexts in southern Britain / / Anne M. Teather.

In this book Anne Teather develops a new approach to understanding the Neolithic flint mines of southern Britain.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Oxford : : Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.,, [2016]
©2016
Year of Publication:2016
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (viii, 114 pages) :; illustrations
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright page
  • Contents
  • List of Figures
  • Foreword
  • List of Figures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Chapter 1
  • Mining and Materiality
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 Aims of this Study
  • 1.3 Outline of the Argument
  • 1.4 Flint Mines and Materiality
  • Chapter 2
  • Situating Flint Mines in Neolithic Studies
  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Mining on Different Geology
  • 2.3 Tracing Functional Interpretations
  • 2.4 Axes: Product and Purpose?
  • 2.5 An Overview of Sites Studied
  • 2.6 The Context and Location of Mines
  • 2.7 Chronology
  • 2.8 Deposition and Art at Flint Mines
  • 2.9 Conclusion
  • Figure 2.1 Map of southern England showing the location of Neolithic flint mines
  • Figure 2.2 Recalibrated radiocarbon dates from Neolithic Langdale axe quarries (after Bradley and Edmonds 1993: 81 [Thunacar Knott BM 676, 4474 +/- 52], 113 [Stake Beck OXA-2181, 4790 +/- 50] 116 [Harrison Stickle BM 2625, 4870 +/- 50], 117 [Harrison Stic
  • Figure 2.3 Plan of Easton Down (redrawn from Stone 1931: 351)
  • Figure 2.4 Plan of Long Down (redrawn from Russell 2000: 82)
  • Figure 2.5 Plan of Harrow Hill (redrawn from Russell 2000: 76)
  • Figure 2.6 Plan of Grimes Graves (redrawn from Longworth and Varndell 1991: front pull out)
  • Figure 2.7 Plan of Stoke Down (redrawn from Barber et al. 1999: 59)
  • Figure 2.8 Plan of Martin's Clump (redrawn from Barber et al. 1999: 36)
  • Figure 2.9 Plan of Cissbury (redrawn from Barber et al. 1999: 29)
  • Figure 2.10 Plan of Blackpatch (redrawn from Pull in Russell 2001: 25-6)
  • Figure 2.11 Plan of Church Hil (redrawn from Pull in Russell 2001: 88)
  • Figure 2.12 Table of possible number of shafts or pits at each site (after Barber et al. 1999)
  • Figure 2.13 Table of approximate depth of shafts at each site (data summarised from Russell 2000: 70-84).
  • Figure 2.14 Recalibrated radiocarbon dates from Neolithic flint mines (Barber et al. 81-2
  • Calibrated using OXCAL v.4.2, IntCal 13, Bronk Ramsay 2009)
  • Figure 2.15 Table of suggested chronological activity at mine sites
  • Chapter 3
  • Addressing Functionality with Materiality and Phenomenology
  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 A History of Artefact Studies
  • 3.3 Defining Archaeological Artefacts and their Ambiguity
  • 3.4 Theoretical Basis of this Study: Integrating Materiality and Personhood
  • 3.5 Applying Structured Deposition
  • 3.6 Methodology
  • 3.7 Conclusion
  • Chapter 4
  • Non-Portable Chalk: Art and Artefacts
  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Chalk Art as Functional and Non-Functional Evidence
  • 4.3 Considering Chalk Art and Deposits as Artefacts
  • 4.4 Chalk Art in the Flint Mines
  • 4.5 Comparisons with Contemporary Monuments
  • 4.6 Understanding Chalk Art and Non-Portable Artefacts in the Neolithic
  • 4.7 Conclusion
  • Figure 4.1 No 2 Escarpment Shaft, Cissbury (after Lane Fox 1876). Scoring was at the entrance of the south gallery and a lattice pattern at the entrance of the west gallery. A double cross and associated 'pick hole' were found on the south wall of an inne
  • Figure 4.2 Shaft 27, Cissbury (after Russell 2001, 112
  • 170). Art was present 15 feet (4.58m) down on the shaft wall to the east, a metre above the shaft floor at 18 feet (5.5m) and opposite the skeleton (found in the west gallery), though this was not il
  • Figure 4.3 The Cissbury cave pit complex art (after Barber et al. 1999: 50)
  • © English Heritage. A reversed numerical '4' with an additional vertical line was in Shaft I above the entrance to the east gallery yet within the gallery itself and 2 feet 6 inc
  • Figure 4.4 The Cissbury cave pit complex, architectural features (after Barber et al. 1999: 51
  • Shaft approximate scale, art not to scale).
  • Figure 4.5 Harrow Hill Shaft 21/13 Complex (after Barber et al. 1999: 51
  • Curwen and Curwen 1926
  • McNabb et al. 1996). © English Heritage. A total of seven examples of chalk art were found in Shaft 21 (after Curwen and Curwen 1926: 121. 126). Graffiti 7 w
  • Figure 4.6 Photograph of chalk block from Harrow Hill (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 4.7 Table of flint mine shafts with art
  • Figure 4.8 Photograph of The Trundle chalk ammonite (photograph author
  • ©Lewes Museum)
  • Figure 4.9 Photograph of The Trundle incised block (photograph author
  • © the Novium [a service provided by Chichester District Council]. All rights reserved)
  • Figure 4.10 Table of art and decorated blocks within Neolithic monuments contemporary to the flint mines
  • Figure 4.11 Table of the types of decoration on deposited chalk blocks
  • Figure 4.12 Photograph of the Fyfield Down polissoir (photograph author)
  • Figure 4.13 Photographs of polissoirs at Lewes Museum, LM1 above, LM2 below (photographs author
  • © Lewes Museum)
  • Figure 4.14 Location of polissoirs at West Kennet (after Piggott 1962
  • approximate scale)
  • Chapter 5
  • Portable Chalk Artefacts
  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Emerging Understandings: A History of Portable Chalk Artefacts
  • 5.3 Structuring Typology: Adding Categorisation
  • 5.4. Chalk Artefact Typology and Categorisation
  • 5.5 Including Portable Chalk Artefacts from Mines with Comparable Forms
  • 5.6 Chalk Artefact Forms in Regional Context
  • 5.7 Understanding Portable Chalk Artefacts
  • 5.8 Conclusion
  • Figure 5.1 Table summarising Varndell's (1991:100-3) suggested typology for chalk objects
  • Figure 5.2 Table summarising the revised chalk typology
  • Figure 5.3 Table of Varndell's (1991) categories, with those altered within Figure 5.4 in bold.
  • Figure 5.4 Table of recategorised artefacts following Figure 5.2
  • Figure 5.5 Table summarising the numbers of chalk artefacts in the mines
  • Figure 5.6 Photograph of Blackpatch chalk axe (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.7 Photograph of Cissbury Shaft 27 burial charms (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.8 Photographs of chalk cylinders from Blackpatch (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.9 Photograph of Church Hill chalk disc (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.10 Photograph of The Lavant Drum (photograph author
  • © the Novium [a service provided by Chichester District Council]. All rights reserved)
  • Figure 5.11 Photographs of Church Hill plaque surface (left) and base (right) (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.12 Photographs of Church Hill plaque sides where ochre slip can be seen (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 5.13 Table of mining sites with early-mid Neolithic chalk artefacts
  • Figure 5.14 Table of mining sites with mid-late Neolithic chalk artefacts
  • Figure 5.15 Table of chalk artefacts in contemporary early-mid Neolithic monuments
  • Figure 5.16 Table of chalk artefacts in contemporary early Neolithic long barrows
  • Figure 5.17 Table of chalk artefacts in contemporary late Neolithic to early Bronze Age monuments
  • Figure 5.18 Table illustrating a chronology of chalk artefacts in Neolithic Britain
  • Figure 5.19 Chart comparing chalk artefact types at different Early Neolithic monuments
  • Figure 5.20 Chart comparing chalk artefact types between later Neolithic monuments
  • Chapter 6
  • Natural Objects to Cultural Artefacts
  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2. Reconsidering Animal and Human Remains
  • 6.3 Expanding Contexts: Creating Artefacts.
  • 6.4 Excavated Artefacts
  • 6.5 Transformed Artefacts
  • 6.6 Aesthetic Deposits: Two Examples
  • 6.7 A Special Case: Human Genital Forms and Mutable Substances
  • 6.8 Conclusion
  • Figure 6.1 Photograph of flint nodule resembling a cat skull, Blackpatch 2005 (photograph author)
  • Figure 6.2 Photograph of Cissbury Shaft 27 flint/fossil phallus (now lost
  • photograph courtesy of David Field)
  • Figure 6.3 Photograph of phallic grouping from Durrington Walls (photograph Mike Parker Pearson)
  • Figure 6.4 Photograph of assorted fossils from Pull's excavations (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 6.5 Photograph of fossils from Pull's excavations (photograph author
  • © Worthing Museum and Art Gallery)
  • Figure 6.6 Table of the deposits of fossil, antler and animal bone from the flint mine shafts
  • Figure 6.7 Table of Neolithic and Bronze Age phalli (adapted from Teather 2007)
  • Chapter 7
  • Beyond Extraction
  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 This Study
  • 7.3 Expanding Interpretations
  • 7.4 Negotiating Presence
  • Bibliography
  • Andersen, S. 1989. Norsminde. A køkkenmødding with late Mesolithic and early Neolithic occupation. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8: 13-40.
  • Index.