Structured deposition of animal remains in the fertile crescent during the bronze age / / José Luis Ramos Soldado.

The aim of this research is to draw up a literature review of the structured deposits of animal remains during the third and second millennia BC in the Ancient Near East for its subsequent classification and detailed interpretation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Oxford, England : : Archaeopress Publishing Limited,, [2016]
©2016
Year of Publication:2016
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (68 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Cover
  • Copyright Information
  • Contents
  • List of Figures
  • List of Tables
  • Abstract
  • Acknowledgements
  • _GoBack
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Historical and archaeological context
  • Table 1. Chronology of the Bronze Age for the Ancient Near East.
  • Table 2. Chronology of the Bronze Age for Mesopotamia (after Cryer, 1995).
  • 3. Structured deposition of animal remains in the Fertile Crescent during the III Millennium BC
  • 3. 1. Structured deposition of animal remains in Syria during the III Millennium BC
  • 3. 1. 1. Tell Beydar
  • 3. 1. 2. Umm el-Marra
  • Equids
  • Bovids
  • Dogs
  • Pigs
  • 3. 1. 3. Tell Halawa
  • Equids
  • Ovicaprines
  • 3. 1. 4. Tell Banat
  • 3. 1. 5. Abu Hamad
  • 3. 1. 6. Tall Bi'a
  • 3. 1. 7. Nagar (Tell Brak)
  • Equids
  • Dogs
  • Fish
  • 3. 2. Structured deposition of animal remains in Mesopotamia during the III Millennium BC
  • 3. 2. 1. al-'Usiyah
  • 3. 2. 2. Tell Madhhur
  • 3. 2. 3. Uch Tepe (Tell Razuk)
  • 3. 2. 4. Tell Abu Qasim
  • 3. 2. 5. Kish
  • 3. 2. 6. Abu Salabikh
  • Equids
  • Ovicaprines
  • 3. 2. 7. Nippur
  • Equids
  • Ovicaprines
  • 3. 2. 8. Lagash (Tell al-Hiba)
  • 3. 2. 9. Ur
  • 3. 2. 10. Additional information about other sites
  • Fig. 1. Map showing some of the sites discussed in section 3. 1. (Author).
  • Fig. 2. Illustration of demoiselle crane anthropoids virgo (after Van Neer, 2000).
  • Fig. 3. Articulated equid skeletons found in Installation G, Upper Layer (after Weber, 2012).
  • Fig. 4. Section of three main levels of occupation in the public sector at Tell Banat that includes the location of the foundation deposit behind Building 6 (after Porter, 2002b).
  • Fig. 5. Skeletons of donkeys 4 (up) and 5 (down) in the original situation they were found at the site (Clutton-Brock, 2001).
  • (after Clutton-Brock, 2001).
  • Fig. 6. The skeleton of the dog as it was found at Tell Brak (Clutton-Brock, 2001).
  • Table. 3. Age, sex, position and orientation of the donkey skeletons found at Tell Brak
  • Fig. 7 Yellow-fin black porgy.
  • Fig. 8. The seabream skeleton from Tell Brak (Roselló Izquierdo &amp
  • Morales Múñiz, 2001).
  • Fig. 9. Location of some of the sites discussed in this section (Author).
  • Fig. 10. Tell Madhhur tomb in Trench 5G (after Killick and Roaf, 1979).
  • Fig. 11. Burial 12 at Tell Razuk (after Zarins, 1986).
  • Fig. 12. A reconstruction of Burial II (after Zarins 1986).
  • Fig. 13. Articulated equid skeleton found in ash-tip at Abu Salabikh (after Postgate, 1986).
  • Fig. 14. Equids found at Grave 162 (after Postgate, 1986).
  • Fig. 15 Plan of Grave 162 showing the five equids in what have been considered their original position (after Postgate, 1983).
  • Fig. 16. Plan of Burial 14, Level XIIIB Chamber (after McMahon, 2006).
  • Fig. 17. Equid skeleton at Burial 14 (after McMahon, 2006).
  • Fig. 18. Ovicaprine skeletons located next to skeleton 3 at Burial 14 (after McMahon, 2006).
  • Fig. 19. Articulated onager skeleton found at Lagash (Area C) (after Zarins 1986).
  • Fig. 20. Plan of PG 789 (after Baadsgaard et al., 2012).
  • Fig. 21. Plan of PG 800 (after Baadsgaard et al., 2012).
  • 4. Structured deposition of animal remains in the
  • Fertile Crescent during the II Millennium BC
  • 4. 1. Structured deposition of animal remains in Mesopotamia during the II Millennium BC
  • 4. 1. 1. Tell Ababra
  • 4. 1. 2. Isin
  • 4. 2. Structured deposition of animal remains in Syria during the II Millennium BC
  • 4. 2. 1. Umm el-Marra
  • 4. 3. Structured deposition of animal remains in the Levant during the II Millennium BC
  • 4. 3. 1. Azor
  • 4. 3. 2. Sasa
  • 4. 3. 3. Tell 'Akko
  • 4. 3. 4. Megiddo
  • 4. 3. 5. Sidon
  • 4. 3. 6. Shechem
  • 4. 3. 7. Jericho.
  • Equids
  • Ovicaprines
  • 4. 3. 8. Gezer
  • 4. 3. 10. Jebel Qa'aqir
  • 4. 3. 11. Tell el-'Ajjul
  • 4. 3. 12. Tell Jemmeh
  • 4. 3. 13. Tel Haror
  • 4. 3. 9. Tell Beth-Shemesh
  • 4. 3. 14. Additional information about other sites
  • Table. 4. Age ratio of animals found in Shaft 1 (after Schwartz, 2013).
  • Fig. 22. Some of the sites discussed in this section (Author).
  • Fig. 23. Bovid skeleton found in Tomb 903 at Megiddo (after Guy, 1938).
  • (after Doument-Serhal, 2013).
  • Fig. 24. Sheep skeleton in Burial 99, Sidon
  • Fig. 25. Ovicaprine skeleton found at Shechem in locus 6:18
  • Fig. 26. Equid skeleton found at Shechem (after Campbell, 2002).
  • in Room 8 (after Campbell, 2002).
  • Fig. 27. Equid skeleton found at Locus 10066 (after Leger &amp
  • Zeder, 1988).
  • Fig. 28. Raven skeleton found at loculi 8430/82091 at Tel Haror, associated with the
  • mandible of a lamb (after Klenck, 2002).
  • Fig. 29. Articulated puppy skeleton found in loculi 8430/82443 at Tel Haror (after Klenck, 2002).
  • Fig. 30. Articulated skeleton of a juveline dog associated with the fragmented remains of a
  • raven at Tel Haror (after Klenck, 2002).
  • 5. Discussion
  • 5.1. Classification of the explained evidence
  • Animal burials inside human graves
  • Animal burials related to human graves
  • Animal deposits unrelated to human graves
  • Animal remains in non-ritual contexts
  • Animals in sacred/ritual contexts
  • Foundation deposits
  • 5. 2. Analysis and interpretation of taxa
  • 5. 2. 1. Equids
  • Donkey
  • Kúnga
  • Mule
  • Onager
  • 5. 2. 2. Dogs
  • 5. 2. 3. Sheeps and goats
  • 5. 2. 4. Bovids
  • 5. 2. 5. Pigs
  • 5. 2. 6. Birds
  • 5. 2. 7. Fish
  • 5. 3. Ritual and sacrifice in the frame of structured deposition of animal remains
  • 5. 4. Conclusions
  • (after Littauer &amp
  • Crouwel, 1979).
  • Fig. 31. Some kúnga pulling from battle wagons depicted in the Standard of Ur (2600 BC)
  • 6. Conclusions
  • Bibliography
  • Appendix A.
  • Number of articulated animal individuals recorded at each site classified by specie, region and period.
  • Appendix A. A. Number of articulated animal individuals recorded at each site in Syria in the third millennium BC.
  • Appendix A. B. Number of articulated animal individuals recorded at each site in Mesopotamia/Iraq in the third millennium BC.
  • Appendix A. C. Number of articulated animal individuals recorded at each site in Mesopotamia/Iraq in the second millennium BC.
  • Appendix A. D. Number of articulated animal individuals recorded at each site in the Levant in the second millennium BC.
  • Appendix B.
  • Identification of equid species classified by site and period.
  • Appendinx B. B. Specie identification of equid individuals from sites dated to the second millennium BC.
  • Appendix B. A. Specie identification of equid individuals from sites dated to the third millennium BC.