Air power as a coercive instrument / / Daniel L. Byman, Matthew C. Waxman, Eric Larson.

Coercion--the use of threatened force to induce an adversary to change its behavior--is a critical function of the U.S. military. U.S. forces have recently fought in the Balkans, the Persian Gulf, and the Horn of Africa to compel recalcitrant regimes and warlords to stop repression, abandon weapons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Year of Publication:1999
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (193 p.)
Notes:
  • "MR-1061-AF."
  • "Project Air Force, Rand".
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 01340nam a2200373Ia 4500
001 993628472004498
005 20200520144314.0
006 m o d |
007 cr#-n---------
008 990407s1999 caua ob 000 0 eng d
020 |a 1-282-45109-X 
020 |a 9786612451096 
020 |a 0-8330-4828-7 
020 |a 0-585-24548-7 
035 |a (CKB)111004368714946 
035 |a (EBL)475036 
035 |a (SSID)ssj0000100691 
035 |a (PQKBManifestationID)11124604 
035 |a (PQKBTitleCode)TC0000100691 
035 |a (PQKBWorkID)10037288 
035 |a (PQKB)11276871 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)EBC475036 
035 |a (EXLCZ)99111004368714946 
040 |a MiAaPQ  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c MiAaPQ  |d MiAaPQ 
041 |a eng 
050 4 |a UG633  |b .B94 1999 
082 0 |a 358.4/14/0973  |2 21 
100 1 |a Byman, Daniel,  |d 1967- 
245 1 0 |a Air power as a coercive instrument /  |c Daniel L. Byman, Matthew C. Waxman, Eric Larson. 
260 |a Santa Monica, CA :  |b Rand,  |c 1999. 
300 |a 1 online resource (193 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt 
337 |a computer  |b c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr 
505 0 |a Cover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgements; Chapter One - Introduction; Coercion and U.S. National Security Policy; The Role of the USAF; Methodology and Cases Examined; Organization; Part 1. Definitions and Theory; Chapter Two - How to Think About Coercion; Definitions; A Theoretical Starting Point; Thinking about Coercion: a Policymaker's Perspective; Problem One: Limited Relevance; Problem Two: Measurement Pathologies; The Uncertain Meaning of "Success"; Conclusions; Part 2. Successful Coercive Diplomacy: Lessons from the Past 
505 8 |a Chapter Three - Explaining Success or Failure: the Historical Record Conditions for Successful Coercion; Escalation Dominance; Threatening to Defeat an Adversary's Strategy; Coercion in Context: Magnifying Third-Party Threats; Common Challenges in Coercive Operations; Intelligence and Estimation Challenges; Misperceptions and Coercion; Credibility Challenges; Feasibility Challenges; Conclusions; Part 3. Coercive Diplomacy Today; Chapter Four - Domestic Constraints on Coercion; Domestic Politics and the Success of Coercive Diplomacy; Constraints and the Democratic System 
505 8 |a The Challenge of Obtaining Domestic Support Consequences of Low Support; Sources of Domestic Constraints; Declaratory Policy; Congressional Checks and Balances, and Other Restrictions; The Press; Some Correlates of Public Support; Some Conditions Under Which Support Is Typically High; How an Adversary can Exploit U.S. Domestic Politics; Diminishing the Interests; Tarnishing the Cause and Conduct of the Operation; Dragging Out a Conflict; Imposing Costs; Manipulating Asymmetries in Escalation Preferences; Conclusions; Chapter Five - Coercion and Coalitions 
505 8 |a The Advantages of Coalitions for Coercers Limits Imposed by Coalitions; Lack of a Common Agenda; Shared Control; Limits to Escalation; Reduced Credibility; Coalitions and Adversary Counter-Coercion; Conclusions; Chapter Six - Coercing Nonstate Actors: a Challenge for the Future; Types of Missions; Coercing Local Warlords; Coercing State Sponsors; Characteristics of Coercive Operations Against Nonstate Actors; Nonstate Adversaries May Lack Identifiable and Targetable Assets; Inaccurate Intelligence Estimates Are Particularly Common; Nonstate Adversaries May Lack Control over Constituent Elements 
505 8 |a Indirect Coercion Is Often Difficult, Unreliable, and Counterproductive Nonstate Actors Are Adept at Exploiting Countermeasures to Coercion; Conclusions; Part 4. Coercion and the U.S. Air Force; Chapter Seven - Implications and Recommendations for the USAF; Air Power and Escalation Dominance; Air Power and Adversary Military Operations; Air Power and the Magnification of Third-Party Threats; Air Power and Common Challenges in Coercive Operations; The Need for Restraint; Appendix A - Cases Examined for this Study; Appendix B - Cases and Conditions for Success 
505 8 |a Appendix C - Coercive Attempts and Common Challenges 
520 |a Coercion--the use of threatened force to induce an adversary to change its behavior--is a critical function of the U.S. military. U.S. forces have recently fought in the Balkans, the Persian Gulf, and the Horn of Africa to compel recalcitrant regimes and warlords to stop repression, abandon weapons programs, permit humanitarian relief, and otherwise modify their actions. Yet despite its overwhelming military might, the United States often fails to coerce successfully. This report examines the phenomenon of coercion and how air power can contribute to its success. Three factors increase the lik 
546 |a English 
500 |a "MR-1061-AF." 
500 |a "Project Air Force, Rand". 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
650 0 |a Air power  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Air power. 
650 0 |a Military planning  |z United States. 
776 |z 0-8330-2743-3 
700 1 |a Larson, Eric V.  |q (Eric Victor),  |d 1957- 
700 1 |a Waxman, Matthew C.,  |d 1972- 
710 2 |a Project Air Force (U.S.) 
710 2 |a Rand Corporation. 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2024-08-03 22:26:31 Europe/Vienna  |d 00  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2012-02-26 02:42:32 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5350461410004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5350461410004498  |b Available  |8 5350461410004498