Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on justice systems : : reconstruction or erosion of justice systems - case study and suggested solution / / edited by Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska.
Saved in:
TeilnehmendeR: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Göttingen, Germany : : V&R Unipress,, [2023] ©2023 |
Year of Publication: | 2023 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (465 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Table of Contents
- Body
- Introduction
- Part I: The administration of justice in national and supranational courts in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic and post pandemic era
- José Igreja Matos: The Covid-19 Pandemic and the independence of judges
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Judicial Independence
- 3. Covid-19 and the Rule of Law
- 4. Covid-19 and justice system
- 5. Conclusions
- References
- Duro Sessa: The Covid-19 pandemic and the rule of law - the lesson to be learned
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Rule of law- what is it?
- 3. Rule of law and pandemic
- 3.1 Right to a fair trial
- 3.2 On the right to access court and remote trial (civil procedure)
- 4. What to do? (instead of conclusion)
- References
- Krystian Markiewicz: The role of courts in enforcing the right to fair trial in post-pandemic reality
- 1. Introductory remarks
- 2. The right of recourse to court in pandemic times
- 3. Law and order, as well as right of recourse to court, are basic rights whose substance cannot be changed
- 4. Admissibility of limitations
- a) General remarks
- b) Limitation of the right of recourse to court and other fundamental rights
- c) Temporariness of restrictions and way of introducing changes
- 5. Role of courts and judges versus pandemic
- 6. Concluding remarks
- References
- Piotr Hofmański: The Covid-19 pandemic and the realities of the International Criminal Court
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The International Criminal Court
- 3. Modification of the procedure before the International Criminal Court
- 4. Conclusions
- Michał Balcerzak: The Covid-19 Pandemic and Proceedings Before the European Court of Human Rights
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Exceptional measures adopted by the Court in March and April 2020
- 3. Priority cases and requests for interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.
- 4. Temporary suspension of time-limits in the proceedings before the ECtHR
- 5. Implications of Article 15 of the Convention (derogation in times of emergency)
- 6. Some emerging issues relating to the Covid-19 pandemic in the case-law of the Court
- 7. Conclusions
- References
- Marcin Dziurda / Paweł Grzegorczyk: The influence of Covid-19 pandemic on the polish civil proceedings from the perspective of the Supreme Court
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Collegiality of adjudication
- 3. Types of court sessions
- 4. Organization and course of a remote hearing
- 5. Access to court files
- 6. Final remarks
- References
- Urszula Żółtak / Bogdan Jędrys: Common courts and pandemic Covid-19 - the lesson that should be learned from practice
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Legislative changes
- 3. Principles and rules
- 4. The principle of the open proceedings
- 5. Written versus orality
- 6. Courts compositions
- 7. Service of judicial documents
- 8. New instruments
- 9. Limitation periods
- 10. Alternative dispute resolution
- 11. Bankruptcy and restricting proceedings
- 12. Enforcement proceedings
- 13. Conclusions
- References
- Grzegorz Borkowski: Performance evaluation of judges after Covid-19 pandemic
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The standards and purpose of performance evaluation
- 3. Performance Indicators
- 4. Methodology
- 5. Who and how evaluates judges
- 6. The Covid-19 pandemic vs. the evaluation of judges
- 7. Concluding remarks
- References
- Part II: Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the civil proceedings
- Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska: Reconstruction or erosion of justice systems as a result of Covid-19 pandemic - conclusions for the legal systems
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Administration of justice systems: what should it be like?
- 3. A change of the model of justice administration in times of Covid-19 pandemic.
- 3.1. A clash of permissible standards of changes in procedural provisions and court law and real reconstruction of justice administration during Covid-19, taking Poland as an example.
- 3.2. Changes in the Polish court law
- 3.3. Changes in the Polish procedural law
- 3.4. Special regulations with respect to functioning of courts and court buildings during pandemic
- 4. Concluding remarks
- References
- Anna Nylund: Comparative insight on courts and court proceedings during the pandemic
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The right to access to court during the pandemic
- 2.1. Access to court as a constitutional and human right
- 2.2. Access to an efficient remedy, the rule of law and courts
- 2.3 Fair trial rights during the pandemic
- 2.4 Access to court as a practical problem during the state of emergency
- 3. Changes to court proceedings during the pandemic
- 3.1. Oral and written proceedings
- 3.2. Witnesses and experts testifying remotely
- 3.3. Changes to procedural rules
- 4. Open administration of justice
- 4.1. Internal openness
- 4.2. Challenge of open hearings during the pandemic
- 4.3. Openness of courts records
- 5. Court management and administration of justice
- 5.1. Health and safety of judges and parties
- 5.2. Transferring cases between courts and judges
- 5.3. Performance indicators during the pandemic
- 6. Dealing with the backlog of cases
- 6.1. Backlogs
- 6.2. Insolvency proceedings
- 7. Concluding remarks
- References
- Fernando Gascón Inchausti: The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on Spanish civil justice: remote hearings as a new tool for the effectiveness of the system
- 1. Introduction
- 2. A bit of context: The situation of Spanish civil justice before the pandemic
- 3. Pandemic and shock treatment: remote hearings as an emergency remedy.
- 3.1. The Spanish Lawmaker prefers hearings to be held in virtual format
- 3.2. While assuming at the same time their shortcomings
- 4. The post-pandemic scenario: remote hearings as a regular feature of judicial proceedings?
- 4.1. The standardisation of remote hearings for the future: reforms in sight
- 4.2. Remote hearings, orality and immediacy
- 4.3. Online hearings and the principle of public proceedings
- 5. Conclusion remarks
- References
- Vigita Vėbraitė / Goda Strikaitė-Latuinskaja: Digitalization of justice in Lithuania
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Liteko - unified information system of Lithuanian courts
- 3. Remote court hearings
- 4. Possibilities of artificial intelligence
- 5. Conclusions
- References
- Iryna Izarova: Digitalization of justice in Ukraine: some remarks on the main goal
- 1. Introduction
- 2. E-justice as Part of the E-government of Ukraine?
- 3. Ukrainian E-Justice: Ideas and the Reality through ten years of Development
- 3.1 E-court in Ukraine: "Court in Smartphone" or "Smartphone in Court"?
- 3.1.1. Video Conference Subsystem - EASYCON
- 3.1.2. Communication With Participants - E-CABINET
- 3.1.3. E-court
- 3.2. Enforcement of Judicial Decisions: A Few Steps in Digitalization
- 3.3. Free Legal Aid Online
- 4. Wartime Challenges for E-Justice in Ukraine
- 5. Some Concluding Remarks
- References
- Andrzej Olaś: Looking beyond Covid-19 pandemic: does Artificial Intelligence have a role to play in preparing the justice system for the next global pandemic or similar hardship? The European perspective
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The notion of AI and its practical applications - outline
- 3. AI in the European e-Justice Paradigm and the Digital Single Market strategy.
- 3.1. Building foundations of a European approach to AI: humble beginnings of integrating AI in the e-Justice Paradigm and the Digital Single Market strategy
- 3.2. Further developments: EC White Paper on AI, the Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field and a toolbox of opportunities
- 3.3. Pending works: AI in judiciary in the EC "AI package", including a Proposal of the Artificial Intelligence Act
- 4. AI and the judiciary in the works of CEPEJ and CoE
- 5. Conclusions: is AI a Holy Grail, a wrong trail, or perhaps yet another element in the toolbox for the efficient administration of justice?
- References
- C.H. van Rhee: Covid-19 and the Role of Orality and Writing in Civil Litigation
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Procedural Innovation in the High and later Middle Ages
- 3. Modernization of Civil Procedure
- 4. Modernization and Fundamental Procedural Principles
- 5. Conclusion
- References
- Piotr Rylski: Organisation of the Civil Proceedings in Poland against the Pandemic
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Written preparation of the case
- 3. Preparatory meeting
- 4. Trial plan
- 5. Giving judgement without a hearing
- 6. Informational activity of the court
- 7. Conclusions
- References
- Anna Machnikowska: The principle of open justice during the Covid-19 pandemic - the polish experience
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The nature of changes concerning the functioning of the principle of open justice in civil proceedings
- 3. Case study - limitations on the openness of the proceedings in civil cases
- 4. Postulates
- 5. Conclusions
- References
- Barbara Cis: Modification of the composition of the court in civil proceedings in the time of the Covid-19 pandemic - an outline of doubts in the context of the principle of the right to a fair trial and the participation of citizens in the administration of justice.
- 1. General remarks.