Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / / Samuel D. Taylor.

This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Funder:
VerfasserIn:
:
Place / Publishing House:Berlin ;, Boston : : Düsseldorf University Press,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Language:English
Series:Dissertations in Language and Cognition
Physical Description:1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993585375904498
ctrlnum (CKB)4100000011789350
(DE-B1597)551691
(OCoLC)1243312263
(DE-B1597)9783110708165
(MiAaPQ)EBC6510043
(Au-PeEL)EBL6510043
(OCoLC)1241452326
(EXLCZ)994100000011789350
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Taylor, Samuel D., author.
Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / Samuel D. Taylor.
Berlin ; Boston : Düsseldorf University Press, [2021]
©2021
1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
Dissertations in Language and Cognition
funded by CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are provided for thinking that an appeal to cognitive science cannot help to decide on the best theory of concepts.
Diss. Universität Düsseldorf 2019.
In English.
Frontmatter -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Standard View Theories of concept -- 3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science -- 4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity -- 5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity -- 6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis -- 7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail -- 8 Appendix -- Bibliography
Description based on print version record.
Cognitive science.
Cognitive Science.
Cognitive Scientific Explanations.
Concepts.
Mental Representations.
3-11-070803-5
CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science funder. fnd http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd
Dissertations in Language and Cognition
language English
format Thesis
eBook
author Taylor, Samuel D.,
spellingShingle Taylor, Samuel D.,
Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
Dissertations in Language and Cognition
Frontmatter --
Acknowledgements --
Contents --
List of Figures --
List of Tables --
1 Introduction --
2 Standard View Theories of concept --
3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science --
4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity --
5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity --
6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis --
7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail --
8 Appendix --
Bibliography
author_facet Taylor, Samuel D.,
CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
author_variant s d t sd sdt
author_role VerfasserIn
author2 CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
author2_role Funder
author_corporate CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science
author_corporate_role Funder
author_sort Taylor, Samuel D.,
title Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
title_full Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / Samuel D. Taylor.
title_fullStr Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / Samuel D. Taylor.
title_full_unstemmed Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / Samuel D. Taylor.
title_auth Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
title_alt Frontmatter --
Acknowledgements --
Contents --
List of Figures --
List of Tables --
1 Introduction --
2 Standard View Theories of concept --
3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science --
4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity --
5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity --
6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis --
7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail --
8 Appendix --
Bibliography
title_new Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
title_sort concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
series Dissertations in Language and Cognition
series2 Dissertations in Language and Cognition
publisher Düsseldorf University Press,
publishDate 2021
physical 1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)
contents Frontmatter --
Acknowledgements --
Contents --
List of Figures --
List of Tables --
1 Introduction --
2 Standard View Theories of concept --
3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science --
4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity --
5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity --
6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis --
7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail --
8 Appendix --
Bibliography
isbn 3-11-070816-7
3-11-070803-5
callnumber-first B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
callnumber-subject BF - Psychology
callnumber-label BF311
callnumber-sort BF 3311 T395 42021
illustrated Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 100 - Philosophy & psychology
dewey-tens 150 - Psychology
dewey-ones 153 - Mental processes & intelligence
dewey-full 153
dewey-sort 3153
dewey-raw 153
dewey-search 153
oclc_num 1243312263
1241452326
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorsamueld conceptsandtheappealtocognitivescience
AT crc991thestructureofrepresentationsinlanguagecognitionandscience conceptsandtheappealtocognitivescience
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)4100000011789350
(DE-B1597)551691
(OCoLC)1243312263
(DE-B1597)9783110708165
(MiAaPQ)EBC6510043
(Au-PeEL)EBL6510043
(OCoLC)1241452326
(EXLCZ)994100000011789350
carrierType_str_mv cr
is_hierarchy_title Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /
author2_original_writing_str_mv noLinkedField
noLinkedField
_version_ 1796653108143587330
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02694nam a2200553 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993585375904498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231110214835.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">211004s2021 gw a o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-11-070816-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9783110708165</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000011789350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)551691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1243312263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)9783110708165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC6510043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL6510043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1241452326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000011789350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">DE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">BF311</subfield><subfield code="b">.T395 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAN009000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">153</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Taylor, Samuel D.,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /</subfield><subfield code="c">Samuel D. Taylor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Boston :</subfield><subfield code="b">Düsseldorf University Press,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dissertations in Language and Cognition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">funded by CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are provided for thinking that an appeal to cognitive science cannot help to decide on the best theory of concepts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diss.</subfield><subfield code="c">Universität Düsseldorf</subfield><subfield code="d">2019.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgements -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">List of Figures -- </subfield><subfield code="t">List of Tables -- </subfield><subfield code="t">1 Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">2 Standard View Theories of concept -- </subfield><subfield code="t">3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science -- </subfield><subfield code="t">4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity -- </subfield><subfield code="t">5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity -- </subfield><subfield code="t">6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis -- </subfield><subfield code="t">7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail -- </subfield><subfield code="t">8 Appendix -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Bibliography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognitive science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cognitive Science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cognitive Scientific Explanations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Concepts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mental Representations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-11-070803-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science</subfield><subfield code="e">funder.</subfield><subfield code="4">fnd</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dissertations in Language and Cognition </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-11-11 04:53:38 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2021-03-13 22:06:10 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5344132520004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5344132520004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5344132520004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>