Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science / / Samuel D. Taylor.

This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Funder:
VerfasserIn:
:
Place / Publishing House:Berlin ;, Boston : : Düsseldorf University Press,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Language:English
Series:Dissertations in Language and Cognition
Physical Description:1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02694nam a2200553 i 4500
001 993585375904498
005 20231110214835.0
006 m o d |
007 cr || ||||||||
008 211004s2021 gw a o 000 0 eng d
020 |a 3-11-070816-7 
024 7 |a 10.1515/9783110708165  |2 doi 
035 |a (CKB)4100000011789350 
035 |a (DE-B1597)551691 
035 |a (OCoLC)1243312263 
035 |a (DE-B1597)9783110708165 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)EBC6510043 
035 |a (Au-PeEL)EBL6510043 
035 |a (OCoLC)1241452326 
035 |a (EXLCZ)994100000011789350 
040 |a MiAaPQ  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c MiAaPQ  |d MiAaPQ 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a gw  |c DE 
050 4 |a BF311  |b .T395 2021 
072 7 |a LAN009000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 |a 153  |2 23 
100 1 |a Taylor, Samuel D.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Concepts and the appeal to cognitive science /  |c Samuel D. Taylor. 
264 1 |a Berlin ;  |a Boston :  |b Düsseldorf University Press,  |c [2021] 
264 4 |c ©2021 
300 |a 1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Dissertations in Language and Cognition 
536 |a funded by CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science 
520 |a This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are provided for thinking that an appeal to cognitive science cannot help to decide on the best theory of concepts. 
502 |a Diss.  |c Universität Düsseldorf  |d 2019. 
546 |a In English. 
505 0 0 |t Frontmatter --   |t Acknowledgements --   |t Contents --   |t List of Figures --   |t List of Tables --   |t 1 Introduction --   |t 2 Standard View Theories of concept --   |t 3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science --   |t 4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity --   |t 5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity --   |t 6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis --   |t 7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail --   |t 8 Appendix --   |t Bibliography 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 0 |a Cognitive science. 
653 |a Cognitive Science. 
653 |a Cognitive Scientific Explanations. 
653 |a Concepts. 
653 |a Mental Representations. 
776 |z 3-11-070803-5 
710 2 |a CRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science  |e funder.  |4 fnd  |4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd 
830 0 |a Dissertations in Language and Cognition  
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2023-11-11 04:53:38 Europe/Vienna  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2021-03-13 22:06:10 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5344132520004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5344132520004498  |b Available  |8 5344132520004498