The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet.
The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon th...
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Leiden : : Koninklijke Brill NV,, [2015] |
Year of Publication: | 2015 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (435 p.) |
Notes: | Description based upon print version of record. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993582951704498 |
---|---|
lccn |
2015957528 |
ctrlnum |
(CKB)3710000000526183 (EBL)4397543 (SSID)ssj0001622746 (PQKBManifestationID)16359361 (PQKBTitleCode)TC0001622746 (PQKBWorkID)14928411 (PQKB)10820064 (MiAaPQ)EBC4397543 (nllekb)BRILL9789004231412 (EXLCZ)993710000000526183 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Croquet, Nicolas A. J., 1978- The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet. Leiden : Koninklijke Brill NV, [2015] 1 online resource (435 p.) text txt computer c online resource cr Description based upon print version of record. English Includes bibliographical references (p. 375-387) and index. Preliminary Material / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- General Conclusions / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Bibliography / Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Index / Nicolas A. J. Croquet. The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies. International criminal law. Proportionality in law. International law and human rights. International criminal law. fast International law and human rights. fast Proportionality in law. fast 90-04-23142-0 |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Croquet, Nicolas A. J., 1978- |
spellingShingle |
Croquet, Nicolas A. J., 1978- The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / Preliminary Material / Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph / Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights / Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses / Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right / Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel / Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures / Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent / Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy / Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate / General Conclusions / Bibliography / Index / |
author_facet |
Croquet, Nicolas A. J., 1978- |
author_variant |
n a j c naj najc |
author_sort |
Croquet, Nicolas A. J., 1978- |
author_additional |
Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- Nicolas A. J. Croquet. |
title |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / |
title_full |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet. |
title_fullStr |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet. |
title_auth |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / |
title_alt |
Preliminary Material / Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph / Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights / Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses / Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right / Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel / Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures / Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent / Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy / Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate / General Conclusions / Bibliography / Index / |
title_new |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / |
title_sort |
the role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / |
publisher |
Koninklijke Brill NV, |
publishDate |
2015 |
physical |
1 online resource (435 p.) |
contents |
Preliminary Material / Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph / Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights / Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses / Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right / Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel / Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures / Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent / Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy / Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate / General Conclusions / Bibliography / Index / |
isbn |
90-04-23141-2 90-04-23142-0 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-subject |
KZ - Law of Nations |
callnumber-label |
KZ7000 |
callnumber-sort |
KZ 47000 C76 42015 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
341 - Law of nations |
dewey-full |
341.48 |
dewey-sort |
3341.48 |
dewey-raw |
341.48 |
dewey-search |
341.48 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT croquetnicolasaj theroleandextentofaproportionalityanalysisinthejudicialassessmentofhumanrightslimitationswithininternationalcriminalproceedings AT croquetnicolasaj roleandextentofaproportionalityanalysisinthejudicialassessmentofhumanrightslimitationswithininternationalcriminalproceedings |
status_str |
c |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)3710000000526183 (EBL)4397543 (SSID)ssj0001622746 (PQKBManifestationID)16359361 (PQKBTitleCode)TC0001622746 (PQKBWorkID)14928411 (PQKB)10820064 (MiAaPQ)EBC4397543 (nllekb)BRILL9789004231412 (EXLCZ)993710000000526183 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / |
_version_ |
1796652858302529537 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04661cam a2200541Ii 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993582951704498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230807205310.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr#-n---------</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151116s2015 ne ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> 2015957528</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">90-04-23141-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004231412</subfield><subfield code="2">DOI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)3710000000526183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EBL)4397543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SSID)ssj0001622746</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PQKBManifestationID)16359361</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001622746</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PQKBWorkID)14928411</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(PQKB)10820064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC4397543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(nllekb)BRILL9789004231412</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)993710000000526183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="c">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KZ7000</subfield><subfield code="b">.C76 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LBBZ</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW026000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">341.48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Croquet, Nicolas A. J.,</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings /</subfield><subfield code="c">by Nicolas A.J. Croquet.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden :</subfield><subfield code="b">Koninklijke Brill NV,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2015]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (435 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based upon print version of record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 375-387) and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Preliminary Material /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">General Conclusions /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Bibliography /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index /</subfield><subfield code="r">Nicolas A. J. Croquet.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International criminal law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International criminal law.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">90-04-23142-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-08-08 05:39:28 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2015-12-12 16:57:58 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Brill</subfield><subfield code="P">EBA Brill All</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343432140004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5343432140004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5343432140004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |