The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings / / by Nicolas A.J. Croquet.

The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden : : Koninklijke Brill NV,, [2015]
Year of Publication:2015
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (435 p.)
Notes:Description based upon print version of record.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04661cam a2200541Ii 4500
001 993582951704498
005 20230807205310.0
006 m o d
007 cr#-n---------
008 151116s2015 ne ob 001 0 eng d
010 |a  2015957528 
020 |a 90-04-23141-2 
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004231412  |2 DOI 
035 |a (CKB)3710000000526183 
035 |a (EBL)4397543 
035 |a (SSID)ssj0001622746 
035 |a (PQKBManifestationID)16359361 
035 |a (PQKBTitleCode)TC0001622746 
035 |a (PQKBWorkID)14928411 
035 |a (PQKB)10820064 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)EBC4397543 
035 |a (nllekb)BRILL9789004231412 
035 |a (EXLCZ)993710000000526183 
040 |a NL-LeKB  |c NL-LeKB  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
050 4 |a KZ7000  |b .C76 2015 
072 7 |a LBBZ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LAW026000  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 0 |a 341.48 
100 1 |a Croquet, Nicolas A. J.,  |d 1978- 
245 1 4 |a The role and extent of a proportionality analysis in the judicial assessment of human rights limitations within international criminal proceedings /  |c by Nicolas A.J. Croquet. 
264 1 |a Leiden :  |b Koninklijke Brill NV,  |c [2015] 
300 |a 1 online resource (435 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt 
337 |a computer  |b c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr 
500 |a Description based upon print version of record. 
546 |a English 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 375-387) and index. 
505 0 0 |t Preliminary Material /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts’ Human Rights Limitation Analyses /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Implied External Limits upon the Accused’s Rights to Efffective Participation in his Trial and to be Presumed Innocent /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Incidental Implied External Limits Placed upon Substantive Human Rights: The Rights to Freedom of Expression and to Privacy /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Implied Internal Limit Placed on the Right of Silence and Judicial Refusal to Place Any Implied Limits on the Right Not to Self-Incriminate /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t General Conclusions /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Bibliography /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet --   |t Index /  |r Nicolas A. J. Croquet. 
520 |a The aim of this monograph is to analyze how the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing implied external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights enjoyed by the accused and other actors affected by international criminal proceedings. Implied external limits in this context are defined as those limits that override the exercise of a human right on public interest grounds or on grounds relating to competing human rights and that either fall outside the scope of a limitation/qualification clause of an international criminal court's internal legal instruments or go beyond its express and ordinary terms. The present monograph will point to various sources of legal uncertainty which international criminal courts have generated in the limitation process of those human rights relevant to international criminal proceedings and to the definition of international crimes. The monograph will examine the relation between human rights, limitations on human rights standards and proportionality under international criminal procedural law and international criminal law (understood substantively) in light of the limitation and proportionality practices of international human rights monitoring bodies. 
650 0 |a International criminal law. 
650 0 |a Proportionality in law. 
650 0 |a International law and human rights. 
650 7 |a International criminal law.  |2 fast 
650 7 |a International law and human rights.  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Proportionality in law.  |2 fast 
776 |z 90-04-23142-0 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2023-08-08 05:39:28 Europe/Vienna  |d 00  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2015-12-12 16:57:58 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i Brill  |P EBA Brill All  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343432140004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5343432140004498  |b Available  |8 5343432140004498