Conscientious objection and human rights : : a systematic analysis / / by Grégor Puppinck.
To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of consc...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Brill research perspectives |
|---|---|
| : | |
| Place / Publishing House: | Leiden : : Brill,, [2017] |
| Year of Publication: | 2017 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Brill Research Perspectives.
|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (vii, 75 pages). |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
993581709604498 |
|---|---|
| ctrlnum |
(CKB)3710000001072729 (MiAaPQ)EBC5597589 (OCoLC)966257611 (nllekb)BRILL9789004341609 (EXLCZ)993710000001072729 |
| collection |
bib_alma |
| record_format |
marc |
| spelling |
Puppinck, Grégor. Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / by Grégor Puppinck. Leiden : Brill, [2017] 1 online resource (vii, 75 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Law and religion Brill research perspectives Includes bibliographical references. To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections. Conscientious objection. Conscientious objectors Legal status, laws, etc. International law and human rights. Conscientious objection. fast Conscientious objectors Legal status, laws, etc. fast International law and human rights. fast 90-04-34159-5 Brill Research Perspectives. |
| language |
English |
| format |
eBook |
| author |
Puppinck, Grégor. |
| spellingShingle |
Puppinck, Grégor. Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / Law and religion Brill research perspectives |
| author_facet |
Puppinck, Grégor. |
| author_variant |
g p gp |
| author_sort |
Puppinck, Grégor. |
| title |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / |
| title_sub |
a systematic analysis / |
| title_full |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / by Grégor Puppinck. |
| title_fullStr |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / by Grégor Puppinck. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / by Grégor Puppinck. |
| title_auth |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / |
| title_new |
Conscientious objection and human rights : |
| title_sort |
conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / |
| series |
Law and religion Brill research perspectives |
| series2 |
Law and religion Brill research perspectives |
| publisher |
Brill, |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| physical |
1 online resource (vii, 75 pages). |
| isbn |
90-04-34160-9 90-04-34159-5 |
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
| callnumber-label |
K4734 |
| callnumber-sort |
K 44734 C6 P87 42017 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
| dewey-ones |
323 - Civil & political rights |
| dewey-full |
323 |
| dewey-sort |
3323 |
| dewey-raw |
323 |
| dewey-search |
323 |
| oclc_num |
966257611 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT puppinckgregor conscientiousobjectionandhumanrightsasystematicanalysis |
| status_str |
c |
| ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)3710000001072729 (MiAaPQ)EBC5597589 (OCoLC)966257611 (OCoLC)965808307 (nllekb)BRILL9789004341609 (EXLCZ)993710000001072729 |
| carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Brill research perspectives |
| is_hierarchy_title |
Conscientious objection and human rights : a systematic analysis / |
| container_title |
Brill research perspectives |
| _version_ |
1796652765152280576 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02223cam a2200457Ii 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993581709604498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230809222754.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161216s2017 ne ob 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">90-04-34160-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004341609</subfield><subfield code="2">DOI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)3710000001072729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5597589</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)966257611</subfield><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)965808307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(nllekb)BRILL9789004341609</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)993710000001072729</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="c">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K4734.C6</subfield><subfield code="b">P87 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LBBR</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL035010</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Puppinck, Grégor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection and human rights :</subfield><subfield code="b">a systematic analysis /</subfield><subfield code="c">by Grégor Puppinck.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden :</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (vii, 75 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law and religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brill research perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objectors</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal status, laws, etc.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objection.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conscientious objectors</subfield><subfield code="x">Legal status, laws, etc.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">International law and human rights.</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">90-04-34159-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Brill Research Perspectives.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-08-10 11:28:03 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2017-03-11 17:26:08 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Brill</subfield><subfield code="P">EBA Brill All</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343099510004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5343099510004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5343099510004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |