Conscientious objection and human rights : : a systematic analysis / / by Grégor Puppinck.
To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of consc...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Brill research perspectives |
|---|---|
| : | |
| Place / Publishing House: | Leiden : : Brill,, [2017] |
| Year of Publication: | 2017 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Brill Research Perspectives.
|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (vii, 75 pages). |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 02223cam a2200457Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 993581709604498 | ||
| 005 | 20230809222754.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
| 008 | 161216s2017 ne ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 90-04-34160-9 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/9789004341609 |2 DOI | |
| 035 | |a (CKB)3710000001072729 | ||
| 035 | |a (MiAaPQ)EBC5597589 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)966257611 |z (OCoLC)965808307 | ||
| 035 | |a (nllekb)BRILL9789004341609 | ||
| 035 | |a (EXLCZ)993710000001072729 | ||
| 040 | |a NL-LeKB |c NL-LeKB |e rda | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a K4734.C6 |b P87 2017 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LBBR |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a POL035010 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 323 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Puppinck, Grégor. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conscientious objection and human rights : |b a systematic analysis / |c by Grégor Puppinck. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Leiden : |b Brill, |c [2017] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (vii, 75 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Law and religion | |
| 490 | 1 | |a Brill research perspectives | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | |a To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Conscientious objection. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Conscientious objectors |x Legal status, laws, etc. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a International law and human rights. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Conscientious objection. |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Conscientious objectors |x Legal status, laws, etc. |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a International law and human rights. |2 fast | |
| 776 | |z 90-04-34159-5 | ||
| 830 | 0 | |a Brill Research Perspectives. | |
| 906 | |a BOOK | ||
| ADM | |b 2023-08-10 11:28:03 Europe/Vienna |f system |c marc21 |a 2017-03-11 17:26:08 Europe/Vienna |g false | ||
| AVE | |i Brill |P EBA Brill All |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343099510004498&Force_direct=true |Z 5343099510004498 |b Available |8 5343099510004498 | ||