Test Pattern : : Instructional Television at Scarborough College, University of Toronto / / John Lee.

• Superior document: Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter University of Toronto Press eBook-Package Archive 1933-1999
• VerfasserIn: Lee, John,
• Place / Publishing House: Toronto : : University of Toronto Press, , [2019]; ©1971
• Year of Publication: 2019
• Language: English
• Series: Heritage
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (144 p.)
• Other title: Frontmatter --; CONTENTS --; TABLES --; CHARTS --; PREFACE --; INTRODUCTION --; 1. A TV COLLEGE IN THEORY --; 2. A TV COLLEGE IN PRACTICE --; 3. THE SCARBOROUGH TELEVISION FACILITIES AND STAFF --; 4. SCARBOROUGH'S TELEVISION TEACHERS --; 5. FACULTY IN A TV COLLEGE --; 6. STUDENTS IN A TV COLLEGE --; 7. THE FUTURE VISION --; APPENDIX 1. Legal Rights and Videotape --; APPENDIX 2. Programs made at Scarborough Studios, 1969-70 --; APPENDIX 3. In Memoriam --; INDEX
• Format: Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.
• ISBN: 9781487576165; 9783110490947
• DOI: 10.3138/9781487576165
• Access: restricted access
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: John Lee.

Scarborough was the first North American university college planned from its inception for television. Closed-circuit TV was fully integrated into its physical fabric and academic program. Videotaped lectures, backed up by small group discussions, were to replace many live lectures. The plan was calculated not only to bring the best lectures abailable to all students, but to save the taxpayers about one million dollars a year. The savings have not resulted; new questions of academic rights and copyright have been raised; and the value of television as a replacement medium is left in doubt. John Lee has written a comprehensive and easily read report of the experiement, its results, and its effects on the internal life of the college. His approach is sociological. While not ignoring the obvious effect of individual personalities involved in the experiment, he contends that the main events were products of the social conditions and forces of time -- among them a rapidly rising student enrolment and technological advances in instructional television. His report is a valuable sociological study of the medium, as well as a detailed examination of the role of television in higher education. It will be of great interest to teachers, administrators, and others concerned with improving university education.