Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / / Martha Whitesmith.
Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approachReveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a proven ability to m...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Edinburgh : : Edinburgh University Press, , [2022] ©2020 |
Year of Publication: | 2022 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW
|
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (304 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
9781474466363 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(DE-B1597)616631 (OCoLC)1306538530 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Whitesmith, Martha, author. aut http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / Martha Whitesmith. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, [2022] ©2020 1 online resource (304 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file PDF rda Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART 1 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: A Theoretical Perspective -- 1 Intelligence and Belief Acquisition -- 2 The Effi cacy of ACH in Establishing Epistemic Justifi cation and Mitigating Cognitive Bias -- PART 2 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: An Empirical Perspective -- 3 The Efficacy of ACH in Mitigating Serial Position Effects and Confirmation Bias in an Intelligence Analysis Scenario -- 4 Predicting Serial Position Effects -- 5 Predicting Confirmation Bias -- 6 Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis -- Appendix: Adaptation of Iraq WMD Case Study to Form Intelligence Case for Experimental Study -- Bibliography -- Index restricted access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec online access with authorization star Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approachReveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a proven ability to mitigate cognitive biasesDemonstrates that judging the credibility of information from human sources means that intelligence analysis faces greater complexity and cognitive strain than non-intelligence analysisExplains the underlying causes cognitive biases, based on meta-analyses of existing researchShows that identifying the ideal conditions for intelligence analysis is a more effective way of reducing the risk of cognitive bias than the use of ACHRecent high-profile intelligence failures – from 9/11 to the 2003 Iraq war – prove that cognitive bias in intelligence analysis can have catastrophic consequences. This book critiques the reliance of Western intelligence agencies on the use of a method for intelligence analysis developed by the CIA in the 1990s, the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH). The author puts ACH to the test in an experimental setting against two key cognitive biases with unique empirical research facilitated by UK’s Professional Heads of Intelligence Analysis unit at the Cabinet Office, and finds that the theoretical basis of the ACH method is significantly flawed. Combining the insight of a practitioner with over 11 years of experience in intelligence with both philosophical theory and experimental research, the author proposes an alternative approach to mitigating cognitive bias that focuses on creating the optimum environment for analysis, challenging current leading theories. Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. In English. Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022) Cognitive science. Decision making. Intelligence service Methodology. Judgment. Politics. POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International). bisacsh Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020 9783110780413 print 9781474466349 https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474466363 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781474466363 Cover https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781474466363/original |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Whitesmith, Martha, Whitesmith, Martha, |
spellingShingle |
Whitesmith, Martha, Whitesmith, Martha, Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART 1 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: A Theoretical Perspective -- 1 Intelligence and Belief Acquisition -- 2 The Effi cacy of ACH in Establishing Epistemic Justifi cation and Mitigating Cognitive Bias -- PART 2 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: An Empirical Perspective -- 3 The Efficacy of ACH in Mitigating Serial Position Effects and Confirmation Bias in an Intelligence Analysis Scenario -- 4 Predicting Serial Position Effects -- 5 Predicting Confirmation Bias -- 6 Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis -- Appendix: Adaptation of Iraq WMD Case Study to Form Intelligence Case for Experimental Study -- Bibliography -- Index |
author_facet |
Whitesmith, Martha, Whitesmith, Martha, |
author_variant |
m w mw m w mw |
author_role |
VerfasserIn VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Whitesmith, Martha, |
title |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / |
title_sub |
Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / |
title_full |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / Martha Whitesmith. |
title_fullStr |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / Martha Whitesmith. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / Martha Whitesmith. |
title_auth |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / |
title_alt |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART 1 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: A Theoretical Perspective -- 1 Intelligence and Belief Acquisition -- 2 The Effi cacy of ACH in Establishing Epistemic Justifi cation and Mitigating Cognitive Bias -- PART 2 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: An Empirical Perspective -- 3 The Efficacy of ACH in Mitigating Serial Position Effects and Confirmation Bias in an Intelligence Analysis Scenario -- 4 Predicting Serial Position Effects -- 5 Predicting Confirmation Bias -- 6 Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis -- Appendix: Adaptation of Iraq WMD Case Study to Form Intelligence Case for Experimental Study -- Bibliography -- Index |
title_new |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : |
title_sort |
cognitive bias in intelligence analysis : testing the analysis of competing hypotheses method / |
series |
Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW |
series2 |
Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW |
publisher |
Edinburgh University Press, |
publishDate |
2022 |
physical |
1 online resource (304 p.) |
contents |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART 1 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: A Theoretical Perspective -- 1 Intelligence and Belief Acquisition -- 2 The Effi cacy of ACH in Establishing Epistemic Justifi cation and Mitigating Cognitive Bias -- PART 2 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: An Empirical Perspective -- 3 The Efficacy of ACH in Mitigating Serial Position Effects and Confirmation Bias in an Intelligence Analysis Scenario -- 4 Predicting Serial Position Effects -- 5 Predicting Confirmation Bias -- 6 Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis -- Appendix: Adaptation of Iraq WMD Case Study to Form Intelligence Case for Experimental Study -- Bibliography -- Index |
isbn |
9781474466363 9783110780413 9781474466349 |
callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
callnumber-subject |
JF - Public Administration |
callnumber-label |
JF1525 |
callnumber-sort |
JF 41525 I6 W45 42020 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474466363 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781474466363 https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781474466363/original |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
320 - Political science |
dewey-ones |
327 - International relations |
dewey-full |
327.12 |
dewey-sort |
3327.12 |
dewey-raw |
327.12 |
dewey-search |
327.12 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1515/9781474466363 |
oclc_num |
1306538530 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT whitesmithmartha cognitivebiasinintelligenceanalysistestingtheanalysisofcompetinghypothesesmethod |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(DE-B1597)616631 (OCoLC)1306538530 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis : Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method / |
container_title |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020 |
_version_ |
1770176951611293696 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05078nam a22006975i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">9781474466363</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-B1597</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220629043637.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||||o||d||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr || ||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220629t20222020stk fo d z eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781474466363</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9781474466363</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-B1597)616631</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1306538530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-B1597</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">stk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB-SCT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">JF1525.I6</subfield><subfield code="b">W45 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL012000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">327.12</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitesmith, Martha, </subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield><subfield code="4">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis :</subfield><subfield code="b">Testing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses Method /</subfield><subfield code="c">Martha Whitesmith.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Edinburgh : </subfield><subfield code="b">Edinburgh University Press, </subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (304 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text file</subfield><subfield code="b">PDF</subfield><subfield code="2">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intelligence, Surveillance and Secret Warfare : ISSW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Frontmatter -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Contents -- </subfield><subfield code="t">List of Figures and Tables -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Acknowledgements -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Introduction -- </subfield><subfield code="t">PART 1 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: A Theoretical Perspective -- </subfield><subfield code="t">1 Intelligence and Belief Acquisition -- </subfield><subfield code="t">2 The Effi cacy of ACH in Establishing Epistemic Justifi cation and Mitigating Cognitive Bias -- </subfield><subfield code="t">PART 2 Intelligence, Bias and Belief Acquisition: An Empirical Perspective -- </subfield><subfield code="t">3 The Efficacy of ACH in Mitigating Serial Position Effects and Confirmation Bias in an Intelligence Analysis Scenario -- </subfield><subfield code="t">4 Predicting Serial Position Effects -- </subfield><subfield code="t">5 Predicting Confirmation Bias -- </subfield><subfield code="t">6 Reducing the Risk of Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Appendix: Adaptation of Iraq WMD Case Study to Form Intelligence Case for Experimental Study -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Bibliography -- </subfield><subfield code="t">Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">restricted access</subfield><subfield code="u">http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec</subfield><subfield code="f">online access with authorization</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approachReveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a proven ability to mitigate cognitive biasesDemonstrates that judging the credibility of information from human sources means that intelligence analysis faces greater complexity and cognitive strain than non-intelligence analysisExplains the underlying causes cognitive biases, based on meta-analyses of existing researchShows that identifying the ideal conditions for intelligence analysis is a more effective way of reducing the risk of cognitive bias than the use of ACHRecent high-profile intelligence failures – from 9/11 to the 2003 Iraq war – prove that cognitive bias in intelligence analysis can have catastrophic consequences. This book critiques the reliance of Western intelligence agencies on the use of a method for intelligence analysis developed by the CIA in the 1990s, the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH). The author puts ACH to the test in an experimental setting against two key cognitive biases with unique empirical research facilitated by UK’s Professional Heads of Intelligence Analysis unit at the Cabinet Office, and finds that the theoretical basis of the ACH method is significantly flawed. Combining the insight of a practitioner with over 11 years of experience in intelligence with both philosophical theory and experimental research, the author proposes an alternative approach to mitigating cognitive bias that focuses on creating the optimum environment for analysis, challenging current leading theories.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="538" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Jun 2022)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cognitive science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Decision making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intelligence service</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judgment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International).</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Title is part of eBook package:</subfield><subfield code="d">De Gruyter</subfield><subfield code="t">Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020</subfield><subfield code="z">9783110780413</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="c">print</subfield><subfield code="z">9781474466349</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474466363</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9781474466363</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="3">Cover</subfield><subfield code="u">https://www.degruyter.com/document/cover/isbn/9781474466363/original</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">978-3-11-078041-3 Edinburgh University Press Complete eBook-Package 2020</subfield><subfield code="b">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_CL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ECL_SN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_EEBKALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_ESSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_PPALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EBA_SSHALL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV-deGruyter-alles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA11SSHE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA13ENGE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA17SSHEE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PDA5EBK</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |