Deterrence by Diplomacy / / Anne E. Sartori.
Why are countries often able to communicate critical information using diplomacy? Why do countries typically use diplomacy honestly, despite incentives to bluff? Why are they often able to deter attacks using merely verbal threats? International relations theory is largely pessimistic about the pros...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Princeton University Press eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2013 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, , [2013] ©2005 |
Year of Publication: | 2013 |
Edition: | Course Book |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (184 p.) :; 7 line illus. 18 tables. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- PART I. Introduction -- CHAPTER 1. Introduction -- PART II. How Bluffs Can Hurt a State's Diplomacy, and Honesty Provides the Ability to Communicate -- CHAPTER 2. The Failure of Chinese Diplomacy, 1950 -- CHAPTER 3. A Reputational Theory of Diplomacy -- PART III. Evidence That Honesty Matters -- CHAPTER 4. Reputations for Honesty and the Success of Diplomacy -- CHAPTER 5. The Broader Importance of Reputations for Honesty -- PART IV. Conclusion -- CHAPTER 6. Conclusion -- PART V. Appendixes -- APPENDIX A. Characterization of the Equilibrium -- APPENDIX B. The Impact of Communication on War and on Welfare -- APPENDIX C. Implications of the Theory -- APPENDIX D. The Effects of Power Status, Contiguity, and Democracy -- Bibliography -- Index |
---|---|
Summary: | Why are countries often able to communicate critical information using diplomacy? Why do countries typically use diplomacy honestly, despite incentives to bluff? Why are they often able to deter attacks using merely verbal threats? International relations theory is largely pessimistic about the prospects for effective diplomacy, yet leaders nevertheless expend much time and energy trying to resolve conflicts through verbal negotiations and public statements. Deterrence by Diplomacy challenges standard understandings of deterrence by analyzing it as a form of talk and reaches conclusions about the effectiveness of diplomacy that are much more optimistic. Anne Sartori argues that diplomacy works precisely because it is so valuable. States take pains to use diplomacy honestly most of the time because doing so allows them to maintain reputations for honesty, which in turn enhance their ability to resolve future disputes using diplomacy rather than force. So, to maintain the effectiveness of their diplomacy, states sometimes acquiesce to others' demands when they might have been able to attain their goals through bluffs. Sartori theorizes that countries obtain a "trade" of issues over time; they get their way more often when they deem the issues more important, and concede more often when they deem the issues less important. Departing from traditional theory, this book shows that rather than always fighting over small issues to show resolve, states can make their threats more credible by sometimes honestly acquiescing over lesser issues--by not crying "wolf." |
Format: | Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
ISBN: | 9781400849444 9783110442502 |
DOI: | 10.1515/9781400849444?locatt=mode:legacy |
Access: | restricted access |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | Anne E. Sartori. |