Improving Interagency Collaboration, Innovation and Learning in Criminal Justice Systems : : Supporting Offender Rehabilitation.
Saved in:
: | |
---|---|
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer International Publishing AG,, 2021. ©2021. |
Year of Publication: | 2021 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (475 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Terminology and Abbreviations
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- 1 Setting the Scene and Introduction
- The COLAB Consortium
- Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and Change Laboratory Model as a Guiding Framework
- Other Theoretical Lenses and Integration Models
- Methods for Promoting Social Innovation and Systemic Change
- The Service User's Voice
- Organisational Multivoicedness
- Who Has Responsibility for Rehabilitation?
- Academic Engagement in Rehabilitation
- Final Thoughts and Further Research
- References
- Part I International Contexts of Collaborative Practice in a Variety of Penal Contexts: Substantive Areas for Organisational Innovation and Change-Studies in Norway
- 2 Interorganisational Collaboration in a Norwegian Prison-Challenges and Opportunities Arising from Interagency Meetings
- Introduction
- The Norwegian Prison Under Study
- Tools Used in Prison
- Theoretical Framework
- Prison as a Research Site and Methodological Challenges
- Data Collection and Observing the Interagency Meetings
- Analysis
- Findings
- Example 1: Transcending professional distinctions to enhance collaboration
- Example 2: Challenges in the usage of a new digital tool to enhance collaboration
- Example 3: The Reconciliation of the Different Needs
- Various Professional Perspectives in the Interagency Meetings
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- References
- 3 Mirrors of Prison Life-From Compartmentalised Practice Towards Boundary Crossing Expertise
- Introduction
- Theoretical-Methodological Framework
- First Mirror: The Psychiatrist
- Second Mirror: The Inmate
- Third Mirror: The Prison Authority and the Primary Health Staff
- Fourth Mirror: The DPS' Staff
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- References.
- 4 "Living with" Interagency Collaboration-Three Sustaining Practices
- Background
- Theoretical Framework
- Institutional Logics
- Organisational Sensemaking and Collaboration
- Empirical Case: The Norwegian Import Model in the Rehabilitation Prison
- Data Collection and Ethical Considerations
- Analysis
- Narratives and Metaphors
- A Modular Vision
- The Use of Double Vision
- Pliable Metaphors
- Tools, Documents and Related Practices
- Multi-professional Structuring Documents
- Pan-Professional Tools
- Pattern of Meetings
- Discussion
- References
- 5 The Application of Norwegian Humane Ideals by Front-Line Workers When Collaboratively Reintegrating Inmates Back into Society
- Introduction
- Humane Traditions in Norway
- Transitional Residences
- Methods
- Front-Line Reintegrative Practice
- Professional Ideals
- Case Study One
- Case Study Two
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- References
- Part II International Contexts of Collaborative Practice in a Variety of Penal Contexts: Substantive Areas for Organisational Innovation and Change-Studies in England
- 6 Tracing the Historical Development of a Service Model for Interagency Collaboration: Contradictions as Barriers and Potential Drivers for Change
- Introduction
- Cultural-Historical Activity Theory as a Means of Exploring the Implementation of the National L&
- D Model
- An Activity Theoretical Case Study of Liaison and Diversion Services
- Study Description
- Sample
- Analysis
- Results of the Case Study: Historical Phases of the L&
- D Work Activity
- The First Phase: The L&
- D Service Prior to the Rollout of a New National Model
- The Second Phase: The L&
- D Services During the Rollout of a New National Model
- The Third Phase: The L&
- D Service After the Rollout of a New National Model
- Discussion and Conclusions
- References.
- 7 Mentoring in Practice: Rebuilding Dialogue with Mentees' Stories
- Introduction
- The Involvement of the Voluntary Community Sector in Criminal Justice
- Benefits and Risks of Through-the-Gate Mentoring Schemes
- Intervening in a Context of Crisis
- Conducting a Hybrid Change Lab/Clinic of Activity Intervention
- Research Findings from the Analytic Phase: Mentoring in Practice
- The Need for Mentors to Work Independently
- The Emotional Labour of the Mentor and Their Need to Maintain Boundaries
- Mentees Need Practical Help and Social Recognition
- The Importance of the Mentor in Assisting in and Navigating Complex Systems
- Conclusion on Mentoring in Practice
- Rebuilding Dialogue Around Mentees' Stories
- Users' Stories as Dialogical Artefacts
- Anchoring Dialogue in Micro-Dramas
- Analysing Data Collaboratively: An Analytical Mismatch for Potential Development
- References
- Part III Strategies and Methods to Promote Collaboration, Management and Innovation
- 8 A COLAB Model of Workplace Transformation in the Criminal Justice Context
- Introduction
- The Structure Within Which Collective Learning Is Located
- Dimension 1: Establishing the Need for an Intervention (Fig. 8.1A)
- Dimension 2: Designing the Structure of the Innovation Space (see Fig. 8.3A, B, D)
- Dimension 3: Managing the Affective or Relational Aspects of the Innovation Space (Fig. 8.3C)
- Dimension 4: Critically Analysing Current Practices in the Organisation(s) Through Uniting Multiple Perspectives (Fig. 8.1B)
- Dimension 5: The Identification of Areas Where Organisational Change Is Required (Fig. 8.1C)
- Dimension 6: Making Collective Sense of Knowledge Presented by Other Relevant Actors of Current and Past Practices (Fig. 8.1D)
- Dimension 7: Solution Formation, Examination, Experimentation and Evaluation in Situ (Fig. 8.1E, F, G, H).
- Dimension 8: Reporting (Fig. 8.1H)
- Dimension 9: Sustainability and Long-Term Implementation of Agreed Service Changes
- Including the Voice of the Service User in the Intervention (Fig. 8.3F)
- Concluding Comments
- References
- 9 Facilitation of Developmental Tasks in Prisons: Applying the Method of Human-Centred Co-evaluation
- Introduction
- The Method of Human-Centred Co-evaluation (HCCE)
- Features of Finnish Prison Services and "Prison A"
- Rehabilitative Work with Prisoners
- The HCCE Facilitation of the Developmental Task Process at Prison A
- Preparation
- The Design Workshop
- Implementation of the Developmental Tasks
- Co-evaluation Workshop
- Discussion and Conclusion
- The Gap Between Control and Rehabilitation in Prison Officers' Work
- The Gap Between Hierarchic and Participatory Cultures of Development
- The Gap Between the Novel Recording Task and Prison Officers' Traditional Tasks
- References
- 10 Interprofessional Collaboration Concerning Offenders in Transition Between Mental Health and Criminal Justice Services. PINCOM Used as a Framework for HCR-20V3 Assessment
- Introduction
- The Need for Interprofessional Collaboration
- The HCR-20v3
- Risk Assessment with the HCR-20V3: The Paramount Role of Context Factors
- The Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model (Pincom)
- The Development of PINCOM and PINCOM-Q
- PINCOM as an Analytical Tool in the Collaboration Process
- Discussion
- Risk assessment with the HCR-20V3: An interface for interprofessional collaboration?
- References
- 11 Early Recognition Method: 'Opening Doors' in Risk Management Dialogue Between Mental Health and Prison Services
- Introduction
- Aims
- Multifactorial nature of violence and its development
- The ERM and the Multivoiced Self
- Recognising Deteriorating Behaviours
- Models of ERM-Plans.
- Generations of Risk Assessment
- The Application of the Early Recognition Method [ERM]
- Phases of the Protocol
- The ERM as a Tool for Client Involvement and Shared Decision-Making in Risk Management
- Transfer of ERM-Knowledge Between Forensic and Prison Services
- Preliminary Findings on the Application of ERM Among Prisoners
- Summary and Conclusions
- References
- 12 People in Contact with Criminal Justice Systems Participating in Service Redesign: Vulnerable Citizens or Democratic Partners?
- Introduction
- The Centrality of Voice and Inclusion
- The Contested Concept of Vulnerabilities
- Service Development Interventions and the Dialectic of Agent and Structure
- Critical Ethnography-the Moral Enterprise of Ethnography
- Ways Forward for Including Offenders in Service Redesign
- References
- 13 Avenues of Opportunity: Journeys of Activities Through Third Sector Organisations
- Introduction: Beyond Prisons
- Third Sector Organisations and the Criminal Justice Service
- Social Anthropology and Ethnography
- Context and Place
- Self and Other
- Capturing Insights
- Modes of Analysis
- Insights and Discussion
- Outdoor Opportunities
- Community Opportunities
- Hidden Opportunities
- Social Boundary Crossing Opportunities
- Organisational Learning Opportunities
- Conclusion
- References
- 14 Facilitating Understanding of Ex-Prison Service Users' Needs: The Utility of Q Method as a Means of Representing Service User Voices in Service Development
- Introduction
- Exemplar Study
- Q Method
- Step 1: Concourse Identification
- Step 2: Q Sampling
- Step 3: Q Sort Administration
- Step 4: Analysis and Interpretation
- Illustrative Example of Using the Q Method With Ex-Prisoners as Service Users
- Participants
- Materials and Procedure
- Analysis
- Ethical Considerations
- Findings and Factor Interpretation.
- Factor 1-The Prison Weary Optimist.