Robust Argumentation Machines : : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings.
Saved in:
Superior document: | Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; v.14638 |
---|---|
: | |
TeilnehmendeR: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Cham : : Springer,, 2024. ©2024. |
Year of Publication: | 2024 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Series: | Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series
|
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (379 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993687477204498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)33133178400041 (MiAaPQ)EBC31554444 (Au-PeEL)EBL31554444 (EXLCZ)9933133178400041 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Cimiano, Philipp. Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. 1st ed. Cham : Springer, 2024. ©2024. 1 online resource (379 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; v.14638 Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. Intro -- Preface -- Organization -- Contents -- Argument Mining -- Natural Language Hypotheses in Scientific Papers and How to Tame Them -- 1 Introduction: Scientific Hypotheses as Complex Claims -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentation Modeling for Complex Scientific Claims -- 2.2 Knowledge Representation: Modeling Scientific Language with Knowledge Graphs -- 2.3 Hypothesis Representation in Invasion Biology -- 3 Example: The Biotic Resistance Hypothesis -- 4 Towards Formalizing Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.1 A Generic Structure for Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.2 Linking Hypothesis Formulations to Semantic Models -- 4.3 Classifying Relationships Between General and Specific Claims -- 5 Applications of the Framework -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusions and Outlook -- Appendix -- References -- Weakly Supervised Claim Localization in Scientific Abstracts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Scientific Claim Detection -- 2.2 Input Optimization for Model Interpretability -- 3 Datasets -- 3.1 The INAS Dataset -- 3.2 The SciFact Dataset -- 4 Method -- 4.1 Span-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.2 Sentence-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.3 Evidence Injection -- 5 Experiments -- 5.1 Span-Level Claim Localization -- 5.2 Sentence-Level Claim Localization -- 6 Results -- 6.1 Span-Level Evidence Localization -- 6.2 Sentence-Level Evidence Localization -- 7 Conclusion -- A Experimental Details -- References -- Argument Mining of Attack and Support Patterns in Dialogical Conversations with Sequential Pattern Mining -- 1 Mining Interactions in Debates -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Predicting a Conversational Dataset -- 3.1 Corpus Creation -- 3.2 Mining Conversation Chains from Incomplete Graphs -- 3.3 Argument Abstraction by Stance and Aspect Prediction -- 3.4 Sequential Pattern Mining on Predicted Data -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Attack and Support Patterns. 4.2 Pattern Mining Vs. Analyzing Distributions -- 5 Conclusion -- 5.1 Limitations -- 5.2 Future Work -- References -- Cluster-Specific Rule Mining for Argumentation-Based Classification -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 3 Cluster-Specific Rule Mining -- 4 Experimental Analysis -- 5 Limitations -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Debate Analysis and Deliberation -- Automatic Analysis of Political Debates and Manifestos: Successes and Challenges -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fine-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 2.1 Less Annotation Is More: Few-Shot Claim Classification -- 2.2 Improving Claim Classification with Hierarchical Information -- 2.3 Multilingual Claim Processing -- 2.4 Robust Actor Detection and Mapping -- 3 Coarse-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 3.1 Ideological Characterization -- 3.2 Policy-Domain Characterization -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis 5540801En6FigaPrint.eps -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Data Model for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3 Constructing PAKTDDO from debate.org -- 3.1 Arguments from debate.org -- 3.2 Characterizing Arguments for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3.3 Authors and Camps -- 3.4 Implementation and Tools for Building and Using PAKT -- 3.5 Preliminary Evaluation -- 4 Analytics Applied to PAKTDDO -- 5 Case Studies -- 5.1 Should Animal Hunting Be Banned? -- 5.2 Comparison to Other Issues -- 5.3 Argument Level -- 6 Related Work -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- PolArg: Unsupervised Polarity Prediction of Arguments in Real-Time Online Conversations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Foundations -- 2.1 Computational Argumentation -- 2.2 Natural Language Processing -- 2.3 Online Conversation Platforms -- 3 Related Work -- 4 Prompting Strategies -- 4.1 Isolated Prompting -- 4.2 Sequential Prompting -- 4.3 Contextualized Prompting. 4.4 Batched Prompting -- 5 Experimental Evaluation -- 5.1 Experimental Setup -- 5.2 Datasets -- 5.3 Results and Discussion -- 5.4 Qualitative Error Analysis -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- A Prompting Templates -- A.1 Isolated Prompting -- A.2 Sequential Prompting -- A.3 Contextualized Prompting -- A.4 Batched Prompting -- References -- Argument Acquisition, Annotation and Quality Assessment -- Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators? -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Evaluating Argument Quality -- 2.2 LLMs as Annotators -- 3 Experimental Design -- 3.1 Expert Annotation -- 3.2 Novice Annotation -- 3.3 Models -- 3.4 Prompting -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Consistency of Argument Quality Annotations -- 4.2 Agreement Between Humans and LLMs -- 4.3 LLMs as Additional Annotators -- 5 Conclusion -- 6 Limitations -- References -- The Impact of Argument Arrangement on Essay Scoring -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Argument-Annotated Essays Corpus -- 3.2 Feedback Corpus -- 3.3 International Corpus of Learner English -- 4 Experiments -- 4.1 ADU and Sematic Type Classification -- 4.2 Predicting Essay Quality with Flows of Semantic Types -- 4.3 Analysis of Feature Impact -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Finding Argument Fragments on Social Media with Corpus Queries and LLMs -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Argumentative Fragments -- 2.1 An Inventory of Logical Patterns -- 2.2 Nested Patterns -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Corpus and Linguistic Annotation -- 3.2 Manual Annotation of Argument Fragments -- 4 Corpus Queries -- 4.1 Methods -- 4.2 Evaluation and Discussion -- 5 Hierarchical Queries -- 5.1 Methods -- 5.2 Evaluation -- 5.3 Discussion -- 6 Fine-Tuning LLMs -- 6.1 Methods and Evaluation -- 6.2 Discussion: Qualitative Comparison of Approaches -- 7 Limitations -- 8 Conclusion -- References. Computational Models of Argumentation -- Enhancing Abstract Argumentation Solvers with Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics: A Feasibility Study -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Solution Approaches in Abstract Argumentation -- 4 Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics -- 5 Experimental Analysis -- 5.1 Datasets and Setup -- 5.2 Initial Experimental Analysis -- 5.3 Evaluation and Results -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Ranking Transition-Based Medical Recommendations Using Assumption-Based Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 2.1 Abstract Argumentation Frameworks -- 2.2 Ranking-Based Semantics -- 2.3 Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks -- 3 Ranking Assumptions -- 4 Case Study -- 5 Related Work -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Causal Reasoning -- 3.1 Defeasible Causal Reasoning -- 3.2 Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 4 Counterfactual Reasoning -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- From Networks to Narratives: Bayes Nets and the Problems of Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation -- 2.1 The Bayesian Framework -- 2.2 Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) -- 2.3 Explaining BBNs: Important Challenges -- 3 Algorithmic Approaches to Bayesian Argumentation -- 3.1 The Relation Between Argument Diagrams and Bayesian Networks -- 3.2 Introducing Three Extant Algorithms -- 3.3 Evaluating the Algorithms: Example Networks -- 4 Limitation -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Enhancing Argument Generation Using Bayesian Networks -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Question of Independent Arguments -- 2.1 Factor Graphs -- 2.2 Overview of the Factor-Graph-Approach Proposed by J. Sevilla -- 3 Testing and Improving the Factor Graph Algorithm. 3.1 Overview of the BARD Project and ``the Spider'' Problem -- 3.2 Results with the Original Algorithm -- 3.3 Diagnosis and Solution Proposal -- 3.4 Results of the Improved Version -- 4 Limitation and Future Work -- 5 Conclusion -- A Appendix -- References -- ``Do Not Disturb My Circles!'' Identifying the Type of Counterfactual at Hand (Short Paper) -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Introductory Example -- 2 Preliminaries and Related work -- 3 Backtracking in Causal Models -- 3.1 When Backtracking is not Enough -- 3.2 Iterative Backup -- 3.3 Default Logic -- 3.4 Integration of Hyperreals -- 4 Discussion -- References -- Interactive Argumentation, Recommendation and Personalization -- BEA: Building Engaging Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentative Dialog Systems -- 2.2 Reflective Engagement -- 2.3 Conversational User Engagement and Virtual Avatars -- 3 Prototype and Architecture of BEA -- 3.1 System Architecture -- 3.2 User Interface -- 4 Modeling Reflective Engagement -- 5 Evaluation -- 5.1 Study 1 ch17weber2023fostering: Analyzing Focus on Challenger Arguments -- 5.2 Study 2 ch17aicherspsiva: Influence of Avatar Interface -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- References -- Deciphering Personal Argument Styles - A Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Linguistic Properties of Argument Preferences -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Argument Data -- 2.2 Argument Preferences -- 2.3 Visual Analytics for Linguistics -- 3 The CUEPAQ Argument Exploration Pipeline -- 3.1 The CUEPipe Workflow -- 3.2 Generating a Data Set for Exploring Argument Preferences -- 3.3 Learning Preferences via Visual Interactive Labeling -- 3.4 Exploring Personal Preferences -- 4 Study: Propositional Attitudes -- 5 Limitations -- 5.1 The CUEPipe -- 5.2 The Proof-of-concept Study -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Argument Search and Retrieval. Extending the Comparative Argumentative Machine: Multilingualism and Stance Detection. Frank, Anette. Kohlhase, Michael. Stein, Benno. 3-031-63535-3 Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Cimiano, Philipp. |
spellingShingle |
Cimiano, Philipp. Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; Intro -- Preface -- Organization -- Contents -- Argument Mining -- Natural Language Hypotheses in Scientific Papers and How to Tame Them -- 1 Introduction: Scientific Hypotheses as Complex Claims -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentation Modeling for Complex Scientific Claims -- 2.2 Knowledge Representation: Modeling Scientific Language with Knowledge Graphs -- 2.3 Hypothesis Representation in Invasion Biology -- 3 Example: The Biotic Resistance Hypothesis -- 4 Towards Formalizing Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.1 A Generic Structure for Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.2 Linking Hypothesis Formulations to Semantic Models -- 4.3 Classifying Relationships Between General and Specific Claims -- 5 Applications of the Framework -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusions and Outlook -- Appendix -- References -- Weakly Supervised Claim Localization in Scientific Abstracts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Scientific Claim Detection -- 2.2 Input Optimization for Model Interpretability -- 3 Datasets -- 3.1 The INAS Dataset -- 3.2 The SciFact Dataset -- 4 Method -- 4.1 Span-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.2 Sentence-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.3 Evidence Injection -- 5 Experiments -- 5.1 Span-Level Claim Localization -- 5.2 Sentence-Level Claim Localization -- 6 Results -- 6.1 Span-Level Evidence Localization -- 6.2 Sentence-Level Evidence Localization -- 7 Conclusion -- A Experimental Details -- References -- Argument Mining of Attack and Support Patterns in Dialogical Conversations with Sequential Pattern Mining -- 1 Mining Interactions in Debates -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Predicting a Conversational Dataset -- 3.1 Corpus Creation -- 3.2 Mining Conversation Chains from Incomplete Graphs -- 3.3 Argument Abstraction by Stance and Aspect Prediction -- 3.4 Sequential Pattern Mining on Predicted Data -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Attack and Support Patterns. 4.2 Pattern Mining Vs. Analyzing Distributions -- 5 Conclusion -- 5.1 Limitations -- 5.2 Future Work -- References -- Cluster-Specific Rule Mining for Argumentation-Based Classification -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 3 Cluster-Specific Rule Mining -- 4 Experimental Analysis -- 5 Limitations -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Debate Analysis and Deliberation -- Automatic Analysis of Political Debates and Manifestos: Successes and Challenges -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fine-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 2.1 Less Annotation Is More: Few-Shot Claim Classification -- 2.2 Improving Claim Classification with Hierarchical Information -- 2.3 Multilingual Claim Processing -- 2.4 Robust Actor Detection and Mapping -- 3 Coarse-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 3.1 Ideological Characterization -- 3.2 Policy-Domain Characterization -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis 5540801En6FigaPrint.eps -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Data Model for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3 Constructing PAKTDDO from debate.org -- 3.1 Arguments from debate.org -- 3.2 Characterizing Arguments for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3.3 Authors and Camps -- 3.4 Implementation and Tools for Building and Using PAKT -- 3.5 Preliminary Evaluation -- 4 Analytics Applied to PAKTDDO -- 5 Case Studies -- 5.1 Should Animal Hunting Be Banned? -- 5.2 Comparison to Other Issues -- 5.3 Argument Level -- 6 Related Work -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- PolArg: Unsupervised Polarity Prediction of Arguments in Real-Time Online Conversations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Foundations -- 2.1 Computational Argumentation -- 2.2 Natural Language Processing -- 2.3 Online Conversation Platforms -- 3 Related Work -- 4 Prompting Strategies -- 4.1 Isolated Prompting -- 4.2 Sequential Prompting -- 4.3 Contextualized Prompting. 4.4 Batched Prompting -- 5 Experimental Evaluation -- 5.1 Experimental Setup -- 5.2 Datasets -- 5.3 Results and Discussion -- 5.4 Qualitative Error Analysis -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- A Prompting Templates -- A.1 Isolated Prompting -- A.2 Sequential Prompting -- A.3 Contextualized Prompting -- A.4 Batched Prompting -- References -- Argument Acquisition, Annotation and Quality Assessment -- Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators? -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Evaluating Argument Quality -- 2.2 LLMs as Annotators -- 3 Experimental Design -- 3.1 Expert Annotation -- 3.2 Novice Annotation -- 3.3 Models -- 3.4 Prompting -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Consistency of Argument Quality Annotations -- 4.2 Agreement Between Humans and LLMs -- 4.3 LLMs as Additional Annotators -- 5 Conclusion -- 6 Limitations -- References -- The Impact of Argument Arrangement on Essay Scoring -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Argument-Annotated Essays Corpus -- 3.2 Feedback Corpus -- 3.3 International Corpus of Learner English -- 4 Experiments -- 4.1 ADU and Sematic Type Classification -- 4.2 Predicting Essay Quality with Flows of Semantic Types -- 4.3 Analysis of Feature Impact -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Finding Argument Fragments on Social Media with Corpus Queries and LLMs -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Argumentative Fragments -- 2.1 An Inventory of Logical Patterns -- 2.2 Nested Patterns -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Corpus and Linguistic Annotation -- 3.2 Manual Annotation of Argument Fragments -- 4 Corpus Queries -- 4.1 Methods -- 4.2 Evaluation and Discussion -- 5 Hierarchical Queries -- 5.1 Methods -- 5.2 Evaluation -- 5.3 Discussion -- 6 Fine-Tuning LLMs -- 6.1 Methods and Evaluation -- 6.2 Discussion: Qualitative Comparison of Approaches -- 7 Limitations -- 8 Conclusion -- References. Computational Models of Argumentation -- Enhancing Abstract Argumentation Solvers with Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics: A Feasibility Study -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Solution Approaches in Abstract Argumentation -- 4 Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics -- 5 Experimental Analysis -- 5.1 Datasets and Setup -- 5.2 Initial Experimental Analysis -- 5.3 Evaluation and Results -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Ranking Transition-Based Medical Recommendations Using Assumption-Based Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 2.1 Abstract Argumentation Frameworks -- 2.2 Ranking-Based Semantics -- 2.3 Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks -- 3 Ranking Assumptions -- 4 Case Study -- 5 Related Work -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Causal Reasoning -- 3.1 Defeasible Causal Reasoning -- 3.2 Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 4 Counterfactual Reasoning -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- From Networks to Narratives: Bayes Nets and the Problems of Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation -- 2.1 The Bayesian Framework -- 2.2 Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) -- 2.3 Explaining BBNs: Important Challenges -- 3 Algorithmic Approaches to Bayesian Argumentation -- 3.1 The Relation Between Argument Diagrams and Bayesian Networks -- 3.2 Introducing Three Extant Algorithms -- 3.3 Evaluating the Algorithms: Example Networks -- 4 Limitation -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Enhancing Argument Generation Using Bayesian Networks -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Question of Independent Arguments -- 2.1 Factor Graphs -- 2.2 Overview of the Factor-Graph-Approach Proposed by J. Sevilla -- 3 Testing and Improving the Factor Graph Algorithm. 3.1 Overview of the BARD Project and ``the Spider'' Problem -- 3.2 Results with the Original Algorithm -- 3.3 Diagnosis and Solution Proposal -- 3.4 Results of the Improved Version -- 4 Limitation and Future Work -- 5 Conclusion -- A Appendix -- References -- ``Do Not Disturb My Circles!'' Identifying the Type of Counterfactual at Hand (Short Paper) -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Introductory Example -- 2 Preliminaries and Related work -- 3 Backtracking in Causal Models -- 3.1 When Backtracking is not Enough -- 3.2 Iterative Backup -- 3.3 Default Logic -- 3.4 Integration of Hyperreals -- 4 Discussion -- References -- Interactive Argumentation, Recommendation and Personalization -- BEA: Building Engaging Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentative Dialog Systems -- 2.2 Reflective Engagement -- 2.3 Conversational User Engagement and Virtual Avatars -- 3 Prototype and Architecture of BEA -- 3.1 System Architecture -- 3.2 User Interface -- 4 Modeling Reflective Engagement -- 5 Evaluation -- 5.1 Study 1 ch17weber2023fostering: Analyzing Focus on Challenger Arguments -- 5.2 Study 2 ch17aicherspsiva: Influence of Avatar Interface -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- References -- Deciphering Personal Argument Styles - A Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Linguistic Properties of Argument Preferences -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Argument Data -- 2.2 Argument Preferences -- 2.3 Visual Analytics for Linguistics -- 3 The CUEPAQ Argument Exploration Pipeline -- 3.1 The CUEPipe Workflow -- 3.2 Generating a Data Set for Exploring Argument Preferences -- 3.3 Learning Preferences via Visual Interactive Labeling -- 3.4 Exploring Personal Preferences -- 4 Study: Propositional Attitudes -- 5 Limitations -- 5.1 The CUEPipe -- 5.2 The Proof-of-concept Study -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Argument Search and Retrieval. Extending the Comparative Argumentative Machine: Multilingualism and Stance Detection. |
author_facet |
Cimiano, Philipp. Frank, Anette. Kohlhase, Michael. Stein, Benno. |
author_variant |
p c pc |
author2 |
Frank, Anette. Kohlhase, Michael. Stein, Benno. |
author2_variant |
a f af m k mk b s bs |
author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR TeilnehmendeR TeilnehmendeR |
author_sort |
Cimiano, Philipp. |
title |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_sub |
First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_full |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_fullStr |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_auth |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
title_new |
Robust Argumentation Machines : |
title_sort |
robust argumentation machines : first international conference, ratio 2024, bielefeld, germany, june 5-7, 2024, proceedings. |
series |
Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; |
series2 |
Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; |
publisher |
Springer, |
publishDate |
2024 |
physical |
1 online resource (379 pages) |
edition |
1st ed. |
contents |
Intro -- Preface -- Organization -- Contents -- Argument Mining -- Natural Language Hypotheses in Scientific Papers and How to Tame Them -- 1 Introduction: Scientific Hypotheses as Complex Claims -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentation Modeling for Complex Scientific Claims -- 2.2 Knowledge Representation: Modeling Scientific Language with Knowledge Graphs -- 2.3 Hypothesis Representation in Invasion Biology -- 3 Example: The Biotic Resistance Hypothesis -- 4 Towards Formalizing Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.1 A Generic Structure for Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.2 Linking Hypothesis Formulations to Semantic Models -- 4.3 Classifying Relationships Between General and Specific Claims -- 5 Applications of the Framework -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusions and Outlook -- Appendix -- References -- Weakly Supervised Claim Localization in Scientific Abstracts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Scientific Claim Detection -- 2.2 Input Optimization for Model Interpretability -- 3 Datasets -- 3.1 The INAS Dataset -- 3.2 The SciFact Dataset -- 4 Method -- 4.1 Span-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.2 Sentence-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.3 Evidence Injection -- 5 Experiments -- 5.1 Span-Level Claim Localization -- 5.2 Sentence-Level Claim Localization -- 6 Results -- 6.1 Span-Level Evidence Localization -- 6.2 Sentence-Level Evidence Localization -- 7 Conclusion -- A Experimental Details -- References -- Argument Mining of Attack and Support Patterns in Dialogical Conversations with Sequential Pattern Mining -- 1 Mining Interactions in Debates -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Predicting a Conversational Dataset -- 3.1 Corpus Creation -- 3.2 Mining Conversation Chains from Incomplete Graphs -- 3.3 Argument Abstraction by Stance and Aspect Prediction -- 3.4 Sequential Pattern Mining on Predicted Data -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Attack and Support Patterns. 4.2 Pattern Mining Vs. Analyzing Distributions -- 5 Conclusion -- 5.1 Limitations -- 5.2 Future Work -- References -- Cluster-Specific Rule Mining for Argumentation-Based Classification -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 3 Cluster-Specific Rule Mining -- 4 Experimental Analysis -- 5 Limitations -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Debate Analysis and Deliberation -- Automatic Analysis of Political Debates and Manifestos: Successes and Challenges -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fine-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 2.1 Less Annotation Is More: Few-Shot Claim Classification -- 2.2 Improving Claim Classification with Hierarchical Information -- 2.3 Multilingual Claim Processing -- 2.4 Robust Actor Detection and Mapping -- 3 Coarse-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 3.1 Ideological Characterization -- 3.2 Policy-Domain Characterization -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis 5540801En6FigaPrint.eps -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Data Model for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3 Constructing PAKTDDO from debate.org -- 3.1 Arguments from debate.org -- 3.2 Characterizing Arguments for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3.3 Authors and Camps -- 3.4 Implementation and Tools for Building and Using PAKT -- 3.5 Preliminary Evaluation -- 4 Analytics Applied to PAKTDDO -- 5 Case Studies -- 5.1 Should Animal Hunting Be Banned? -- 5.2 Comparison to Other Issues -- 5.3 Argument Level -- 6 Related Work -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- PolArg: Unsupervised Polarity Prediction of Arguments in Real-Time Online Conversations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Foundations -- 2.1 Computational Argumentation -- 2.2 Natural Language Processing -- 2.3 Online Conversation Platforms -- 3 Related Work -- 4 Prompting Strategies -- 4.1 Isolated Prompting -- 4.2 Sequential Prompting -- 4.3 Contextualized Prompting. 4.4 Batched Prompting -- 5 Experimental Evaluation -- 5.1 Experimental Setup -- 5.2 Datasets -- 5.3 Results and Discussion -- 5.4 Qualitative Error Analysis -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- A Prompting Templates -- A.1 Isolated Prompting -- A.2 Sequential Prompting -- A.3 Contextualized Prompting -- A.4 Batched Prompting -- References -- Argument Acquisition, Annotation and Quality Assessment -- Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators? -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Evaluating Argument Quality -- 2.2 LLMs as Annotators -- 3 Experimental Design -- 3.1 Expert Annotation -- 3.2 Novice Annotation -- 3.3 Models -- 3.4 Prompting -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Consistency of Argument Quality Annotations -- 4.2 Agreement Between Humans and LLMs -- 4.3 LLMs as Additional Annotators -- 5 Conclusion -- 6 Limitations -- References -- The Impact of Argument Arrangement on Essay Scoring -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Argument-Annotated Essays Corpus -- 3.2 Feedback Corpus -- 3.3 International Corpus of Learner English -- 4 Experiments -- 4.1 ADU and Sematic Type Classification -- 4.2 Predicting Essay Quality with Flows of Semantic Types -- 4.3 Analysis of Feature Impact -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Finding Argument Fragments on Social Media with Corpus Queries and LLMs -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Argumentative Fragments -- 2.1 An Inventory of Logical Patterns -- 2.2 Nested Patterns -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Corpus and Linguistic Annotation -- 3.2 Manual Annotation of Argument Fragments -- 4 Corpus Queries -- 4.1 Methods -- 4.2 Evaluation and Discussion -- 5 Hierarchical Queries -- 5.1 Methods -- 5.2 Evaluation -- 5.3 Discussion -- 6 Fine-Tuning LLMs -- 6.1 Methods and Evaluation -- 6.2 Discussion: Qualitative Comparison of Approaches -- 7 Limitations -- 8 Conclusion -- References. Computational Models of Argumentation -- Enhancing Abstract Argumentation Solvers with Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics: A Feasibility Study -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Solution Approaches in Abstract Argumentation -- 4 Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics -- 5 Experimental Analysis -- 5.1 Datasets and Setup -- 5.2 Initial Experimental Analysis -- 5.3 Evaluation and Results -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Ranking Transition-Based Medical Recommendations Using Assumption-Based Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 2.1 Abstract Argumentation Frameworks -- 2.2 Ranking-Based Semantics -- 2.3 Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks -- 3 Ranking Assumptions -- 4 Case Study -- 5 Related Work -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Causal Reasoning -- 3.1 Defeasible Causal Reasoning -- 3.2 Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 4 Counterfactual Reasoning -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- From Networks to Narratives: Bayes Nets and the Problems of Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation -- 2.1 The Bayesian Framework -- 2.2 Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) -- 2.3 Explaining BBNs: Important Challenges -- 3 Algorithmic Approaches to Bayesian Argumentation -- 3.1 The Relation Between Argument Diagrams and Bayesian Networks -- 3.2 Introducing Three Extant Algorithms -- 3.3 Evaluating the Algorithms: Example Networks -- 4 Limitation -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Enhancing Argument Generation Using Bayesian Networks -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Question of Independent Arguments -- 2.1 Factor Graphs -- 2.2 Overview of the Factor-Graph-Approach Proposed by J. Sevilla -- 3 Testing and Improving the Factor Graph Algorithm. 3.1 Overview of the BARD Project and ``the Spider'' Problem -- 3.2 Results with the Original Algorithm -- 3.3 Diagnosis and Solution Proposal -- 3.4 Results of the Improved Version -- 4 Limitation and Future Work -- 5 Conclusion -- A Appendix -- References -- ``Do Not Disturb My Circles!'' Identifying the Type of Counterfactual at Hand (Short Paper) -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Introductory Example -- 2 Preliminaries and Related work -- 3 Backtracking in Causal Models -- 3.1 When Backtracking is not Enough -- 3.2 Iterative Backup -- 3.3 Default Logic -- 3.4 Integration of Hyperreals -- 4 Discussion -- References -- Interactive Argumentation, Recommendation and Personalization -- BEA: Building Engaging Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentative Dialog Systems -- 2.2 Reflective Engagement -- 2.3 Conversational User Engagement and Virtual Avatars -- 3 Prototype and Architecture of BEA -- 3.1 System Architecture -- 3.2 User Interface -- 4 Modeling Reflective Engagement -- 5 Evaluation -- 5.1 Study 1 ch17weber2023fostering: Analyzing Focus on Challenger Arguments -- 5.2 Study 2 ch17aicherspsiva: Influence of Avatar Interface -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- References -- Deciphering Personal Argument Styles - A Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Linguistic Properties of Argument Preferences -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Argument Data -- 2.2 Argument Preferences -- 2.3 Visual Analytics for Linguistics -- 3 The CUEPAQ Argument Exploration Pipeline -- 3.1 The CUEPipe Workflow -- 3.2 Generating a Data Set for Exploring Argument Preferences -- 3.3 Learning Preferences via Visual Interactive Labeling -- 3.4 Exploring Personal Preferences -- 4 Study: Propositional Attitudes -- 5 Limitations -- 5.1 The CUEPipe -- 5.2 The Proof-of-concept Study -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Argument Search and Retrieval. Extending the Comparative Argumentative Machine: Multilingualism and Stance Detection. |
isbn |
3-031-63536-1 3-031-63535-3 |
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
callnumber-subject |
Q - General Science |
callnumber-label |
Q334-342 |
callnumber-sort |
Q 3334 3342 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cimianophilipp robustargumentationmachinesfirstinternationalconferenceratio2024bielefeldgermanyjune572024proceedings AT frankanette robustargumentationmachinesfirstinternationalconferenceratio2024bielefeldgermanyjune572024proceedings AT kohlhasemichael robustargumentationmachinesfirstinternationalconferenceratio2024bielefeldgermanyjune572024proceedings AT steinbenno robustargumentationmachinesfirstinternationalconferenceratio2024bielefeldgermanyjune572024proceedings |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)33133178400041 (MiAaPQ)EBC31554444 (Au-PeEL)EBL31554444 (EXLCZ)9933133178400041 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; v.14638 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Robust Argumentation Machines : First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings. |
container_title |
Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ; v.14638 |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField noLinkedField noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1809671915320639488 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>11207nam a22004813i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993687477204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240729084506.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240729s2024 xx o ||||0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-031-63536-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)33133178400041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC31554444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL31554444</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)9933133178400041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Q334-342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cimiano, Philipp.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Robust Argumentation Machines :</subfield><subfield code="b">First International Conference, RATIO 2024, Bielefeld, Germany, June 5-7, 2024, Proceedings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham :</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer,</subfield><subfield code="c">2024.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2024.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (379 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series ;</subfield><subfield code="v">v.14638</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Preface -- Organization -- Contents -- Argument Mining -- Natural Language Hypotheses in Scientific Papers and How to Tame Them -- 1 Introduction: Scientific Hypotheses as Complex Claims -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentation Modeling for Complex Scientific Claims -- 2.2 Knowledge Representation: Modeling Scientific Language with Knowledge Graphs -- 2.3 Hypothesis Representation in Invasion Biology -- 3 Example: The Biotic Resistance Hypothesis -- 4 Towards Formalizing Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.1 A Generic Structure for Scientific Hypotheses -- 4.2 Linking Hypothesis Formulations to Semantic Models -- 4.3 Classifying Relationships Between General and Specific Claims -- 5 Applications of the Framework -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusions and Outlook -- Appendix -- References -- Weakly Supervised Claim Localization in Scientific Abstracts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Scientific Claim Detection -- 2.2 Input Optimization for Model Interpretability -- 3 Datasets -- 3.1 The INAS Dataset -- 3.2 The SciFact Dataset -- 4 Method -- 4.1 Span-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.2 Sentence-Level Claim Evidence Localization -- 4.3 Evidence Injection -- 5 Experiments -- 5.1 Span-Level Claim Localization -- 5.2 Sentence-Level Claim Localization -- 6 Results -- 6.1 Span-Level Evidence Localization -- 6.2 Sentence-Level Evidence Localization -- 7 Conclusion -- A Experimental Details -- References -- Argument Mining of Attack and Support Patterns in Dialogical Conversations with Sequential Pattern Mining -- 1 Mining Interactions in Debates -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Predicting a Conversational Dataset -- 3.1 Corpus Creation -- 3.2 Mining Conversation Chains from Incomplete Graphs -- 3.3 Argument Abstraction by Stance and Aspect Prediction -- 3.4 Sequential Pattern Mining on Predicted Data -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Attack and Support Patterns.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.2 Pattern Mining Vs. Analyzing Distributions -- 5 Conclusion -- 5.1 Limitations -- 5.2 Future Work -- References -- Cluster-Specific Rule Mining for Argumentation-Based Classification -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 3 Cluster-Specific Rule Mining -- 4 Experimental Analysis -- 5 Limitations -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Debate Analysis and Deliberation -- Automatic Analysis of Political Debates and Manifestos: Successes and Challenges -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fine-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 2.1 Less Annotation Is More: Few-Shot Claim Classification -- 2.2 Improving Claim Classification with Hierarchical Information -- 2.3 Multilingual Claim Processing -- 2.4 Robust Actor Detection and Mapping -- 3 Coarse-Grained Analysis of Political Discourse -- 3.1 Ideological Characterization -- 3.2 Policy-Domain Characterization -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis 5540801En6FigaPrint.eps -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Data Model for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3 Constructing PAKTDDO from debate.org -- 3.1 Arguments from debate.org -- 3.2 Characterizing Arguments for Perspectivized Argumentation -- 3.3 Authors and Camps -- 3.4 Implementation and Tools for Building and Using PAKT -- 3.5 Preliminary Evaluation -- 4 Analytics Applied to PAKTDDO -- 5 Case Studies -- 5.1 Should Animal Hunting Be Banned? -- 5.2 Comparison to Other Issues -- 5.3 Argument Level -- 6 Related Work -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- PolArg: Unsupervised Polarity Prediction of Arguments in Real-Time Online Conversations -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Foundations -- 2.1 Computational Argumentation -- 2.2 Natural Language Processing -- 2.3 Online Conversation Platforms -- 3 Related Work -- 4 Prompting Strategies -- 4.1 Isolated Prompting -- 4.2 Sequential Prompting -- 4.3 Contextualized Prompting.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.4 Batched Prompting -- 5 Experimental Evaluation -- 5.1 Experimental Setup -- 5.2 Datasets -- 5.3 Results and Discussion -- 5.4 Qualitative Error Analysis -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- A Prompting Templates -- A.1 Isolated Prompting -- A.2 Sequential Prompting -- A.3 Contextualized Prompting -- A.4 Batched Prompting -- References -- Argument Acquisition, Annotation and Quality Assessment -- Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators? -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Evaluating Argument Quality -- 2.2 LLMs as Annotators -- 3 Experimental Design -- 3.1 Expert Annotation -- 3.2 Novice Annotation -- 3.3 Models -- 3.4 Prompting -- 4 Results -- 4.1 Consistency of Argument Quality Annotations -- 4.2 Agreement Between Humans and LLMs -- 4.3 LLMs as Additional Annotators -- 5 Conclusion -- 6 Limitations -- References -- The Impact of Argument Arrangement on Essay Scoring -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Argument-Annotated Essays Corpus -- 3.2 Feedback Corpus -- 3.3 International Corpus of Learner English -- 4 Experiments -- 4.1 ADU and Sematic Type Classification -- 4.2 Predicting Essay Quality with Flows of Semantic Types -- 4.3 Analysis of Feature Impact -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Finding Argument Fragments on Social Media with Corpus Queries and LLMs -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Argumentative Fragments -- 2.1 An Inventory of Logical Patterns -- 2.2 Nested Patterns -- 3 Data -- 3.1 Corpus and Linguistic Annotation -- 3.2 Manual Annotation of Argument Fragments -- 4 Corpus Queries -- 4.1 Methods -- 4.2 Evaluation and Discussion -- 5 Hierarchical Queries -- 5.1 Methods -- 5.2 Evaluation -- 5.3 Discussion -- 6 Fine-Tuning LLMs -- 6.1 Methods and Evaluation -- 6.2 Discussion: Qualitative Comparison of Approaches -- 7 Limitations -- 8 Conclusion -- References.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computational Models of Argumentation -- Enhancing Abstract Argumentation Solvers with Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics: A Feasibility Study -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Solution Approaches in Abstract Argumentation -- 4 Machine Learning-Guided Heuristics -- 5 Experimental Analysis -- 5.1 Datasets and Setup -- 5.2 Initial Experimental Analysis -- 5.3 Evaluation and Results -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Ranking Transition-Based Medical Recommendations Using Assumption-Based Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 2.1 Abstract Argumentation Frameworks -- 2.2 Ranking-Based Semantics -- 2.3 Assumption-Based Argumentation Frameworks -- 3 Ranking Assumptions -- 4 Case Study -- 5 Related Work -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- Argumentation-Based Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Preliminaries -- 3 Causal Reasoning -- 3.1 Defeasible Causal Reasoning -- 3.2 Probabilistic Causal Reasoning -- 4 Counterfactual Reasoning -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion -- References -- From Networks to Narratives: Bayes Nets and the Problems of Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Bayesian Approach to Argumentation -- 2.1 The Bayesian Framework -- 2.2 Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) -- 2.3 Explaining BBNs: Important Challenges -- 3 Algorithmic Approaches to Bayesian Argumentation -- 3.1 The Relation Between Argument Diagrams and Bayesian Networks -- 3.2 Introducing Three Extant Algorithms -- 3.3 Evaluating the Algorithms: Example Networks -- 4 Limitation -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Enhancing Argument Generation Using Bayesian Networks -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Question of Independent Arguments -- 2.1 Factor Graphs -- 2.2 Overview of the Factor-Graph-Approach Proposed by J. Sevilla -- 3 Testing and Improving the Factor Graph Algorithm.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.1 Overview of the BARD Project and ``the Spider'' Problem -- 3.2 Results with the Original Algorithm -- 3.3 Diagnosis and Solution Proposal -- 3.4 Results of the Improved Version -- 4 Limitation and Future Work -- 5 Conclusion -- A Appendix -- References -- ``Do Not Disturb My Circles!'' Identifying the Type of Counterfactual at Hand (Short Paper) -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Introductory Example -- 2 Preliminaries and Related work -- 3 Backtracking in Causal Models -- 3.1 When Backtracking is not Enough -- 3.2 Iterative Backup -- 3.3 Default Logic -- 3.4 Integration of Hyperreals -- 4 Discussion -- References -- Interactive Argumentation, Recommendation and Personalization -- BEA: Building Engaging Argumentation -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Related Work -- 2.1 Argumentative Dialog Systems -- 2.2 Reflective Engagement -- 2.3 Conversational User Engagement and Virtual Avatars -- 3 Prototype and Architecture of BEA -- 3.1 System Architecture -- 3.2 User Interface -- 4 Modeling Reflective Engagement -- 5 Evaluation -- 5.1 Study 1 ch17weber2023fostering: Analyzing Focus on Challenger Arguments -- 5.2 Study 2 ch17aicherspsiva: Influence of Avatar Interface -- 6 Limitations -- 7 Conclusion and Future Work -- References -- Deciphering Personal Argument Styles - A Comprehensive Approach to Analyzing Linguistic Properties of Argument Preferences -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Background -- 2.1 Argument Data -- 2.2 Argument Preferences -- 2.3 Visual Analytics for Linguistics -- 3 The CUEPAQ Argument Exploration Pipeline -- 3.1 The CUEPipe Workflow -- 3.2 Generating a Data Set for Exploring Argument Preferences -- 3.3 Learning Preferences via Visual Interactive Labeling -- 3.4 Exploring Personal Preferences -- 4 Study: Propositional Attitudes -- 5 Limitations -- 5.1 The CUEPipe -- 5.2 The Proof-of-concept Study -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Argument Search and Retrieval.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Extending the Comparative Argumentative Machine: Multilingualism and Stance Detection.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frank, Anette.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kohlhase, Michael.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stein, Benno.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-031-63535-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-09-09 00:20:14 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">System</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2024-07-23 19:32:07 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5357522970004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5357522970004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5357522970004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |