Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / / Alexandra Ellen Hansen.
This thesis aims to shed light on the ECtHR's fact-assessment procedures, and it suggests that principles of scientific method can be applied to analyse and critique the ECtHR's practice in this regard. The contribution of this doctoral thesis is that it provides an analytical framework of...
Saved in:
| VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Place / Publishing House: | Baden-Baden : : Nomos,, 2022. |
| Year of Publication: | 2022 |
| Language: | German |
| Physical Description: | 1 Online Ressource |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
993682216404498 |
|---|---|
| ctrlnum |
(CKB)5860000000057230 (NjHacI)995860000000057230 (EXLCZ)995860000000057230 |
| collection |
bib_alma |
| record_format |
marc |
| spelling |
Hansen, Alexandra Ellen, author. Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / Alexandra Ellen Hansen. Baden-Baden : Nomos, 2022. 1 Online Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Open Access Unrestricted online access star Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (Nomos, viewed July 16, 2023). This thesis aims to shed light on the ECtHR's fact-assessment procedures, and it suggests that principles of scientific method can be applied to analyse and critique the ECtHR's practice in this regard. The contribution of this doctoral thesis is that it provides an analytical framework of reflection to detect flaws in the ECtHR's factual analyses, thus offering a new scientific perspective on the ECtHR's case law. Human rights. 3-8487-8985-X |
| language |
German |
| format |
eBook |
| author |
Hansen, Alexandra Ellen, |
| spellingShingle |
Hansen, Alexandra Ellen, Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / |
| author_facet |
Hansen, Alexandra Ellen, |
| author_variant |
a e h ae aeh |
| author_role |
VerfasserIn |
| author_sort |
Hansen, Alexandra Ellen, |
| title |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / |
| title_sub |
how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / |
| title_full |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / Alexandra Ellen Hansen. |
| title_fullStr |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / Alexandra Ellen Hansen. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / Alexandra Ellen Hansen. |
| title_auth |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / |
| title_new |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : |
| title_sort |
facts before the european court of human rights : how does the european court of human rights (ecthr) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ecthr in its case-law? / |
| publisher |
Nomos, |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| physical |
1 Online Ressource |
| isbn |
3-7489-3322-3 3-8487-8985-X |
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
| callnumber-label |
K3240 |
| callnumber-sort |
K 43240 H367 42022 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| dewey-ones |
341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-full |
341.48 |
| dewey-sort |
3341.48 |
| dewey-raw |
341.48 |
| dewey-search |
341.48 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT hansenalexandraellen factsbeforetheeuropeancourtofhumanrightshowdoestheeuropeancourtofhumanrightsecthrcontendwithfactsandhowcanprinciplesofscientificmethodbeusedtocritiquethefactualanalysesbytheecthrinitscaselaw |
| status_str |
n |
| ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)5860000000057230 (NjHacI)995860000000057230 (EXLCZ)995860000000057230 |
| carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
| is_hierarchy_title |
Facts before the European Court of Human Rights : how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? / |
| _version_ |
1805334571034607616 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01601nam a2200301 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993682216404498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230716204551.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230716s2022 gw o 000 0 ger d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3-7489-3322-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)5860000000057230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(NjHacI)995860000000057230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)995860000000057230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NjHacI</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">NjHacl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3240</subfield><subfield code="b">.H367 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">341.48</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hansen, Alexandra Ellen,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Facts before the European Court of Human Rights :</subfield><subfield code="b">how does the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) contend with facts, and how can principles of scientific method be used to critique the factual analyses by the ECtHR in its case-law? /</subfield><subfield code="c">Alexandra Ellen Hansen.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden :</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos,</subfield><subfield code="c">2022.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Open Access</subfield><subfield code="f">Unrestricted online access</subfield><subfield code="2">star</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (Nomos, viewed July 16, 2023).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This thesis aims to shed light on the ECtHR's fact-assessment procedures, and it suggests that principles of scientific method can be applied to analyse and critique the ECtHR's practice in this regard. The contribution of this doctoral thesis is that it provides an analytical framework of reflection to detect flaws in the ECtHR's factual analyses, thus offering a new scientific perspective on the ECtHR's case law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human rights.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-8487-8985-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-07-23 03:04:42 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">System</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2022-07-14 08:50:39 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5356873770004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5356873770004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5356873770004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |