The neglected goat : : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages / / Lenny Salvagno.

Based on a combination of morphological and biometrical analyses, this book provides a new, objective and transparent methodology to distinguish between sheep and goat post cranial bones in the archaeological record. Additionally, on the basis of the newly proposed approach, it reassesses the role o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Oxford : : Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.,, [2020]
©2020
Year of Publication:2020
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (888 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993669637904498
ctrlnum (CKB)4100000012027307
(MiAaPQ)EBC6728879
(Au-PeEL)EBL6728879
(OCoLC)1276856849
(EXLCZ)994100000012027307
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Salvagno, Lenny, author.
The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages / Lenny Salvagno.
Oxford : Archaeopress Publishing Ltd., [2020]
©2020
1 online resource (888 pages)
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
Based on a combination of morphological and biometrical analyses, this book provides a new, objective and transparent methodology to distinguish between sheep and goat post cranial bones in the archaeological record. Additionally, on the basis of the newly proposed approach, it reassesses the role of the goat in medieval England.
Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction and background -- 1.1 Research questions and book structure -- 1.1.1 Description of the structure of this book -- 1.2 Taxonomy -- 1.3 Methodological background -- 1.3.1 Morphological approach -- 1.3.1.1 Post-cranial bones -- 1.3.1.2 Mandibular teeth -- 1.3.2 Non morphological approaches -- 1.3.3 Biometrical approach -- 1.3.4 Conclusions -- 1.4 The medieval English goat: setting the scene -- 1.4.1 The historical evidence for the medieval goat -- 1.4.2 Zooarchaeological evidence for the medieval goat -- 2 Study of the morphological traits and biometry of the modern material -- 2.1 Methods -- 2.1.1 Introduction -- 2.1.2 Morphological Approach -- 2.1.3 Biometrical approach -- 2.1.4 The Recording Protocol -- 2.2 Materials -- 2.3 Inter-Observer Error and Intra-Observer Error: consistency tests -- 2.3.1 Reliability Tests -- 2.3.2 Inter-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.3 Intra-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.4 Conclusions -- 2.4 Morphological results -- 2.4.1 Reliability of the morphological diagnostic traits -- 2.4.2 Influence of sex -- 2.4.3 Influence of age -- 2.4.4 Conclusions -- 2.5 Biometric results -- 2.5.1 Descriptive Statistics -- 2.5.2 Bivariate plots -- 2.5.3 Allometric shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 2.5.4 Statistical Analyses: Mann Whitney U test and Multivariate Approaches -- 2.5.5 Mann Whitney U-test and Manova -- 2.5.6 Discriminant Analysis -- 2.5.7 Principal Component Analysis -- 2.5.8 Conclusions -- 2.6 Discussion of the study of the modern material: morphological and biometrical approach -- 3 Reevaluation of the role of the goat in medieval England -- 3.1 The archaeological sites -- 3.2 King's Lynn (AD 1050-1800) -- 3.2.1 Introduction -- 3.2.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.2.3 Activities at King's Lynn.
3.2.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.2.5 Reevaluation of King's Lynn sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.2.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.2.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.2.8 DA predictions of the sheep/goat assemblage from King's Lynn -- 3.2.9 Discriminant Analysis on the King's Lynn material in toto -- 3.2.10 Discussion -- 3.2.10.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.2.10.2 The King's Lynn case study -- 3.3 Medieval and Post-medieval Flaxengate (c. late 11th century AD -- late 14th - middle 16th century AD) -- 3.3.1 Introduction -- 3.3.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.3.3 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.3.4 Reevaluation of Flaxengate sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.3.5 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.3.6 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.3.7 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.3.8 Discussion -- 3.3.8.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.3.8.2 The Flaxengate case study -- 3.4 Woolmonger /Kingswell Street, Northampton (c. 1000-1550 AD) -- 3.4.1 Introduction -- 3.4.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.4.3 Trade activities at Northampton -- 3.4.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.4.5 Reevaluation of Woolmonger/ Kingswell Street sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.4.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.4.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.4.8 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.4.9 Discussion -- 3.4.1.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.4.1.2 The Woolmonger/Kingswell Street case study -- 3.5 Discussion of the application of the new methodology on Archaeological assemblages -- 3.6 Reassessment of the role of the goat in medieval English husbandry and economy: a beginning. -- 3.7 Future developments: the way is paved -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- Appendices.
Appendix I: The importance of the goat in the human past -- 1.1 The domestication of the goat: background, dynamics, place and time -- 1.2 The wild progenitor of the domestic goat -- 1.3 Differences and similarities with the sheep -- Appendix II: Bland and Altman plots as integration of the ICC (Inter-Observer Error) -- Appendix III: Descriptive statistics for the moden sheep and goat material -- Appendix IV: Assumptions for Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) -- Appendix V: PCA, a Brief Glossary -- Appendix VI: DA: how to use it to predict new archaeological cases.
Description based on print version record.
Animal remains (Archaeology) England Identification Methodology.
Goats England History To 1500.
Domesday book.
language English
format eBook
author Salvagno, Lenny,
spellingShingle Salvagno, Lenny,
The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /
Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction and background -- 1.1 Research questions and book structure -- 1.1.1 Description of the structure of this book -- 1.2 Taxonomy -- 1.3 Methodological background -- 1.3.1 Morphological approach -- 1.3.1.1 Post-cranial bones -- 1.3.1.2 Mandibular teeth -- 1.3.2 Non morphological approaches -- 1.3.3 Biometrical approach -- 1.3.4 Conclusions -- 1.4 The medieval English goat: setting the scene -- 1.4.1 The historical evidence for the medieval goat -- 1.4.2 Zooarchaeological evidence for the medieval goat -- 2 Study of the morphological traits and biometry of the modern material -- 2.1 Methods -- 2.1.1 Introduction -- 2.1.2 Morphological Approach -- 2.1.3 Biometrical approach -- 2.1.4 The Recording Protocol -- 2.2 Materials -- 2.3 Inter-Observer Error and Intra-Observer Error: consistency tests -- 2.3.1 Reliability Tests -- 2.3.2 Inter-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.3 Intra-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.4 Conclusions -- 2.4 Morphological results -- 2.4.1 Reliability of the morphological diagnostic traits -- 2.4.2 Influence of sex -- 2.4.3 Influence of age -- 2.4.4 Conclusions -- 2.5 Biometric results -- 2.5.1 Descriptive Statistics -- 2.5.2 Bivariate plots -- 2.5.3 Allometric shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 2.5.4 Statistical Analyses: Mann Whitney U test and Multivariate Approaches -- 2.5.5 Mann Whitney U-test and Manova -- 2.5.6 Discriminant Analysis -- 2.5.7 Principal Component Analysis -- 2.5.8 Conclusions -- 2.6 Discussion of the study of the modern material: morphological and biometrical approach -- 3 Reevaluation of the role of the goat in medieval England -- 3.1 The archaeological sites -- 3.2 King's Lynn (AD 1050-1800) -- 3.2.1 Introduction -- 3.2.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.2.3 Activities at King's Lynn.
3.2.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.2.5 Reevaluation of King's Lynn sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.2.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.2.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.2.8 DA predictions of the sheep/goat assemblage from King's Lynn -- 3.2.9 Discriminant Analysis on the King's Lynn material in toto -- 3.2.10 Discussion -- 3.2.10.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.2.10.2 The King's Lynn case study -- 3.3 Medieval and Post-medieval Flaxengate (c. late 11th century AD -- late 14th - middle 16th century AD) -- 3.3.1 Introduction -- 3.3.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.3.3 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.3.4 Reevaluation of Flaxengate sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.3.5 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.3.6 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.3.7 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.3.8 Discussion -- 3.3.8.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.3.8.2 The Flaxengate case study -- 3.4 Woolmonger /Kingswell Street, Northampton (c. 1000-1550 AD) -- 3.4.1 Introduction -- 3.4.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.4.3 Trade activities at Northampton -- 3.4.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.4.5 Reevaluation of Woolmonger/ Kingswell Street sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.4.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.4.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.4.8 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.4.9 Discussion -- 3.4.1.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.4.1.2 The Woolmonger/Kingswell Street case study -- 3.5 Discussion of the application of the new methodology on Archaeological assemblages -- 3.6 Reassessment of the role of the goat in medieval English husbandry and economy: a beginning. -- 3.7 Future developments: the way is paved -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- Appendices.
Appendix I: The importance of the goat in the human past -- 1.1 The domestication of the goat: background, dynamics, place and time -- 1.2 The wild progenitor of the domestic goat -- 1.3 Differences and similarities with the sheep -- Appendix II: Bland and Altman plots as integration of the ICC (Inter-Observer Error) -- Appendix III: Descriptive statistics for the moden sheep and goat material -- Appendix IV: Assumptions for Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) -- Appendix V: PCA, a Brief Glossary -- Appendix VI: DA: how to use it to predict new archaeological cases.
author_facet Salvagno, Lenny,
author_variant l s ls
author_role VerfasserIn
author_sort Salvagno, Lenny,
title The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /
title_sub a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /
title_full The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages / Lenny Salvagno.
title_fullStr The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages / Lenny Salvagno.
title_full_unstemmed The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages / Lenny Salvagno.
title_auth The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /
title_new The neglected goat :
title_sort the neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the english middle ages /
publisher Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.,
publishDate 2020
physical 1 online resource (888 pages)
contents Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction and background -- 1.1 Research questions and book structure -- 1.1.1 Description of the structure of this book -- 1.2 Taxonomy -- 1.3 Methodological background -- 1.3.1 Morphological approach -- 1.3.1.1 Post-cranial bones -- 1.3.1.2 Mandibular teeth -- 1.3.2 Non morphological approaches -- 1.3.3 Biometrical approach -- 1.3.4 Conclusions -- 1.4 The medieval English goat: setting the scene -- 1.4.1 The historical evidence for the medieval goat -- 1.4.2 Zooarchaeological evidence for the medieval goat -- 2 Study of the morphological traits and biometry of the modern material -- 2.1 Methods -- 2.1.1 Introduction -- 2.1.2 Morphological Approach -- 2.1.3 Biometrical approach -- 2.1.4 The Recording Protocol -- 2.2 Materials -- 2.3 Inter-Observer Error and Intra-Observer Error: consistency tests -- 2.3.1 Reliability Tests -- 2.3.2 Inter-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.3 Intra-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.4 Conclusions -- 2.4 Morphological results -- 2.4.1 Reliability of the morphological diagnostic traits -- 2.4.2 Influence of sex -- 2.4.3 Influence of age -- 2.4.4 Conclusions -- 2.5 Biometric results -- 2.5.1 Descriptive Statistics -- 2.5.2 Bivariate plots -- 2.5.3 Allometric shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 2.5.4 Statistical Analyses: Mann Whitney U test and Multivariate Approaches -- 2.5.5 Mann Whitney U-test and Manova -- 2.5.6 Discriminant Analysis -- 2.5.7 Principal Component Analysis -- 2.5.8 Conclusions -- 2.6 Discussion of the study of the modern material: morphological and biometrical approach -- 3 Reevaluation of the role of the goat in medieval England -- 3.1 The archaeological sites -- 3.2 King's Lynn (AD 1050-1800) -- 3.2.1 Introduction -- 3.2.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.2.3 Activities at King's Lynn.
3.2.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.2.5 Reevaluation of King's Lynn sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.2.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.2.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.2.8 DA predictions of the sheep/goat assemblage from King's Lynn -- 3.2.9 Discriminant Analysis on the King's Lynn material in toto -- 3.2.10 Discussion -- 3.2.10.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.2.10.2 The King's Lynn case study -- 3.3 Medieval and Post-medieval Flaxengate (c. late 11th century AD -- late 14th - middle 16th century AD) -- 3.3.1 Introduction -- 3.3.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.3.3 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.3.4 Reevaluation of Flaxengate sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.3.5 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.3.6 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.3.7 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.3.8 Discussion -- 3.3.8.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.3.8.2 The Flaxengate case study -- 3.4 Woolmonger /Kingswell Street, Northampton (c. 1000-1550 AD) -- 3.4.1 Introduction -- 3.4.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.4.3 Trade activities at Northampton -- 3.4.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.4.5 Reevaluation of Woolmonger/ Kingswell Street sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.4.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.4.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.4.8 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.4.9 Discussion -- 3.4.1.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.4.1.2 The Woolmonger/Kingswell Street case study -- 3.5 Discussion of the application of the new methodology on Archaeological assemblages -- 3.6 Reassessment of the role of the goat in medieval English husbandry and economy: a beginning. -- 3.7 Future developments: the way is paved -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- Appendices.
Appendix I: The importance of the goat in the human past -- 1.1 The domestication of the goat: background, dynamics, place and time -- 1.2 The wild progenitor of the domestic goat -- 1.3 Differences and similarities with the sheep -- Appendix II: Bland and Altman plots as integration of the ICC (Inter-Observer Error) -- Appendix III: Descriptive statistics for the moden sheep and goat material -- Appendix IV: Assumptions for Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) -- Appendix V: PCA, a Brief Glossary -- Appendix VI: DA: how to use it to predict new archaeological cases.
isbn 1-78969-630-5
callnumber-first D - World History
callnumber-subject DA - Great Britain
callnumber-label DA190
callnumber-sort DA 3190 D7 S258 42020
geographic_facet England
era_facet To 1500.
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 330 - Economics
dewey-ones 330 - Economics
dewey-full 330.942021
dewey-sort 3330.942021
dewey-raw 330.942021
dewey-search 330.942021
oclc_num 1276856849
work_keys_str_mv AT salvagnolenny theneglectedgoatanewmethodtoassesstheroleofthegoatintheenglishmiddleages
AT salvagnolenny neglectedgoatanewmethodtoassesstheroleofthegoatintheenglishmiddleages
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)4100000012027307
(MiAaPQ)EBC6728879
(Au-PeEL)EBL6728879
(OCoLC)1276856849
(EXLCZ)994100000012027307
carrierType_str_mv cr
is_hierarchy_title The neglected goat : a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /
_version_ 1799743976036630528
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05896nam a2200397 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993669637904498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230914233934.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr#cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220601s2020 enk o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1-78969-630-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000012027307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC6728879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL6728879</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1276856849</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000012027307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">e-uk-en</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">DA190.D7</subfield><subfield code="b">.S258 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330.942021</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salvagno, Lenny,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The neglected goat :</subfield><subfield code="b">a new method to assess the role of the goat in the English Middle Ages /</subfield><subfield code="c">Lenny Salvagno.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford :</subfield><subfield code="b">Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (888 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on a combination of morphological and biometrical analyses, this book provides a new, objective and transparent methodology to distinguish between sheep and goat post cranial bones in the archaeological record. Additionally, on the basis of the newly proposed approach, it reassesses the role of the goat in medieval England.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction and background -- 1.1 Research questions and book structure -- 1.1.1 Description of the structure of this book -- 1.2 Taxonomy -- 1.3 Methodological background -- 1.3.1 Morphological approach -- 1.3.1.1 Post-cranial bones -- 1.3.1.2 Mandibular teeth -- 1.3.2 Non morphological approaches -- 1.3.3 Biometrical approach -- 1.3.4 Conclusions -- 1.4 The medieval English goat: setting the scene -- 1.4.1 The historical evidence for the medieval goat -- 1.4.2 Zooarchaeological evidence for the medieval goat -- 2 Study of the morphological traits and biometry of the modern material -- 2.1 Methods -- 2.1.1 Introduction -- 2.1.2 Morphological Approach -- 2.1.3 Biometrical approach -- 2.1.4 The Recording Protocol -- 2.2 Materials -- 2.3 Inter-Observer Error and Intra-Observer Error: consistency tests -- 2.3.1 Reliability Tests -- 2.3.2 Inter-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.3 Intra-Observer Error: Inter Correlation Coefficient -- 2.3.4 Conclusions -- 2.4 Morphological results -- 2.4.1 Reliability of the morphological diagnostic traits -- 2.4.2 Influence of sex -- 2.4.3 Influence of age -- 2.4.4 Conclusions -- 2.5 Biometric results -- 2.5.1 Descriptive Statistics -- 2.5.2 Bivariate plots -- 2.5.3 Allometric shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 2.5.4 Statistical Analyses: Mann Whitney U test and Multivariate Approaches -- 2.5.5 Mann Whitney U-test and Manova -- 2.5.6 Discriminant Analysis -- 2.5.7 Principal Component Analysis -- 2.5.8 Conclusions -- 2.6 Discussion of the study of the modern material: morphological and biometrical approach -- 3 Reevaluation of the role of the goat in medieval England -- 3.1 The archaeological sites -- 3.2 King's Lynn (AD 1050-1800) -- 3.2.1 Introduction -- 3.2.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.2.3 Activities at King's Lynn.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.2.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.2.5 Reevaluation of King's Lynn sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.2.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.2.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.2.8 DA predictions of the sheep/goat assemblage from King's Lynn -- 3.2.9 Discriminant Analysis on the King's Lynn material in toto -- 3.2.10 Discussion -- 3.2.10.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.2.10.2 The King's Lynn case study -- 3.3 Medieval and Post-medieval Flaxengate (c. late 11th century AD -- late 14th - middle 16th century AD) -- 3.3.1 Introduction -- 3.3.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.3.3 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.3.4 Reevaluation of Flaxengate sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.3.5 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.3.6 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.3.7 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.3.8 Discussion -- 3.3.8.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.3.8.2 The Flaxengate case study -- 3.4 Woolmonger /Kingswell Street, Northampton (c. 1000-1550 AD) -- 3.4.1 Introduction -- 3.4.2 Archaeological Investigations -- 3.4.3 Trade activities at Northampton -- 3.4.4 What does the zooarchaeological evidence say? -- 3.4.5 Reevaluation of Woolmonger/ Kingswell Street sheep/goat bone material: methodology -- 3.4.6 Morphological Approach: Results -- 3.4.7 Shape analysis as expressed by Biometrical Indices -- 3.4.8 Discriminant Analysis -- 3.4.9 Discussion -- 3.4.1.1 An assessment of the new methodology -- 3.4.1.2 The Woolmonger/Kingswell Street case study -- 3.5 Discussion of the application of the new methodology on Archaeological assemblages -- 3.6 Reassessment of the role of the goat in medieval English husbandry and economy: a beginning. -- 3.7 Future developments: the way is paved -- 4 Conclusions -- References -- Appendices.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Appendix I: The importance of the goat in the human past -- 1.1 The domestication of the goat: background, dynamics, place and time -- 1.2 The wild progenitor of the domestic goat -- 1.3 Differences and similarities with the sheep -- Appendix II: Bland and Altman plots as integration of the ICC (Inter-Observer Error) -- Appendix III: Descriptive statistics for the moden sheep and goat material -- Appendix IV: Assumptions for Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) -- Appendix V: PCA, a Brief Glossary -- Appendix VI: DA: how to use it to predict new archaeological cases.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Animal remains (Archaeology)</subfield><subfield code="z">England</subfield><subfield code="x">Identification</subfield><subfield code="x">Methodology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Goats</subfield><subfield code="z">England</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">To 1500.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Domesday book.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-05-22 09:02:37 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">System</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2021-10-02 22:09:52 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Archaeopress</subfield><subfield code="P">Archaeopress complete</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5355433560004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5355433560004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5355433560004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>