Table of Contents: New Advances in the History of Archaeology :

New Advances in the History of Archaeology : : Proceedings of the XVIII UISPP World Congress (4-9 June 2018, Paris, France) Volume 16 (Sessions Organised by the History of Archaeology Scientific Commission at the XVIII World UISPP).

New Advances in the History of Archaeology presents the papers from three sessions organised by the History of Archaeology Scientific Commission at the 18th UISPP World Congress (Paris, June 2018). The first session, From stratigraphy to stratigraphic excavation in pre- and protohistoric archaeology...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Superior document:	Proceedings of the UISPP World Congress Series
:	de Beaune, Sophie A.
TeilnehmendeR:	Guidi, Alessandro. Moro Abadía, Oscar.
Place / Publishing House:	Oxford : : Archaeopress,, 2021. ©2021.
Year of Publication:	2021
Edition:	1st ed.
Language:	English
Series:	Proceedings of the UISPP World Congress Series
Physical Description:	ill
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Table of Contents:

Cover
Copyright Page
Contents
List of Figures
Démarche d'historien et de préhistorien ou comment pallier les manques dans l'étude
Figure 1. Carte de localisation des sites paléolithiques incluant les sites mentionnés dans cette étude : n°7 et n° 8 © Notter in Rossoni-Notter et al. 2016.
Figure 3. Première page d'un carnet de note de la grotte du Prince (Barmal del Ponte) tenu par Léonce de Villeneuve 1899-1900. Inédit (©Archives du M.A.P. de Monaco).
Figure 4. Troisième Journal de la grotte du Prince (Barma del Ponte), Coupes, décembre 1897, page 9. Inédit (©Archives du M.A.P.).
Figure 6. Exemple d'étiquetage d'une pièce lithique, pastille bleue à la grotte du Prince, Foyer C.
Figure 7. Lot d'industries lithiques provenant de l'abri Lorenzi (Balzi Rossi, Vintimille, Italie). Photographie datée de 1920. Archives du Musée d'Anthropologie préhistorique de Monaco.
Figure 8. Dessin du dernier biface découvert à la grotte de l'Observatoire (Monaco) en 1919. Archives du Palais Princier de Monaco.
Figure 9. Lot d'industries lithiques provenant de la grotte du Cavillon (Balzi Rossi, Vintimille, Italie) et présenté par foyers au sein d'une vitrine du premier Musée d'Anthropologie préhistorique de Monaco. Photographies datée de 1920 et d'aujourd'hui.
Figure 10. Lot d'industries lithiques provenant du Foyer A de la grotte du Prince (Balzi Rossi, Vintimille, Italie). Photographie datée du 5 décembre 1896. Archives du Palais Princier de Monaco.
Santa Verna in 1911 and 2015: re-examining pioneering stratigraphic excavation methods.
Figure 1. Map of the Central Mediterranean region showing the location of the Maltese Islands and the site of Santa Verna.
Figure 2. Portrait of Thomas Ashby 1874-1931 (BSR copyright).
Figure 4. Santa Verna in 2015.
Figure 5. Sub-adult skeleton exposed at Santa Verna in 1911 (Bradley 1912).
Figure 6. Measured plan, profile and section drawing of Santa Verna, Gozo (Ashby et al. 1913).
Figure 7. Detail illustrating the vertical section through deposits at Santa Verna.
Figure 8. Ashby and Bradley's 1911 sondage re-excavated in 2015.
Figure 9. Structural features at Santa Verna in 1911 (left) and 2015 (right).
Figure 10. Section drawings from the 2015 excavations at Santa Verna. Compare with Figure 7.
Figure 11. Bayesian model for the sequence of radiocarbon dates associated with the Santa Verna 'temple' megalithic building.
The multiple roots of an innovative excavation: G.A. Blanc at the Romanelli Cave
Figure 1. Gian Alberto Blanc (1879-1966), on the right side, illustrates the cave to a group of visitors in the 1930s (Archivio dell'Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria).
Figure 2. Grotta Romanelli view from the sea in 1914 (Archivio dell'Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria).
Figure 3. Numerous and beautiful illustrative plates published in Blanc 1928 demonstrate that the finds were rigorously distinguished by their layer of provenience.
Figure 4. G.A. Blanc carried out microscopic observation to verify the hypothesis of an aeolian origin for the sands found in Romanelli Cave
several microphotographs were published (from Blanc 1928).
Figure 5. Paolo Graziosi (1906-1988), on the right side, at Romanelli cave in the 1930s (Archivio dell'Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria).
Figure 6. ???.
Paul Vouga à La Tène et à Auvernier : la stratigraphie à l'épreuve de la typologie
Figure 1. Position du site de La Tène, dans la baie d'Épagnier, à l'extrémité nord-est du lac de Neuchâtel, près de la rivière Thielle. Aujourd'hui canalisée, celle-ci déverse les eaux du lac de Neuchâtel dans celui de Bienne. Photographie B. Arnold. Inf
Figure 2. Paul Vouga (1880-1940) à l'âge de 25 ans environ. Professeur d'histoire et de français à l'école de Commerce de Neuchâtel, il s'occupe en outre, en dehors de son poste et sans rémunération, de la collection archéologique du Musée historique et d
Figure 3. En 11 ans, les fouilles officielles de La Tène ont touché une surface de 170 mètres de long, par 25 à 40 de largeur et jusqu'à plus de 4 mètres de profondeur. Commencées en aval du pont Desor, elles vident progressivement l'intégralité du comble
Figure 4. Les fouilles progressent par tranchées perpendiculaires au chenal comblé de l'ancienne Thielle, mettant en évidence de spectaculaires coupes. La Tène, 28.09.1911. Archives du Laténium.
Figure 5. Du relevé de détail au simple profil, les coupes stratigraphiques du site de La Tène ont été inégalement documentées durant les fouilles officielles. Archives du Laténium. Infographie OPAN/J. Spielmann.
Figure 6. Le plan du site que donne Vouga dans sa monographie reflète sa conception du site, où tout est contemporain. (Vouga 1923).
Figure 7. Paul Vouga et la stratigraphie néolithique d'Auvernier/La Saunerie, le 20 sept. 1919. Photographie Samuel Perret, Archives du Laténium.
Pioneers of archaeological stratigraphical techniques
Figure 1. Giorgio Buchner (1914-2005).
Figure 2. Vivara island, in red point the Buchner's trenches.
Figure 3. Luigi Bernabò Brea (1910-1999).
Figure 4. Salvatore Maria Puglisi (1912-1985).
Figure 5. Grotta delle Felci, Buchner's documentation of section South of principal trench IIPU excavation (1941).
Figure 6. Grotta delle Felci_IIPU Multidisciplinary Research Team: Luigi Cardini (1898-1971), first at right and then Buchner, Blanc and Settepassi.
Figure 7. Papesca
obsidian tools found by Buchner (1949).
Figure 8. Alfred Rittmann (1893-1980).
Figure 9. Buchner at Punta Milazzese settlement (Panarea) and A&amp
B huts (from Mastelloni 2020, p. 184, fig. 2).
Figure 10. Poliochni, Lemnos. A stratigraphical section in the Room 819, Bernabò Brea excavation 1936 (Archive of the Italian Archaeological School at Athens).
Figure 11. Poliochni, Lemnos. Stratigraphical section of Room 864 by Bernabò Brea 1952 (after Bernabò Brea 1964).
Figure 12. Arene Candide, excavations 1940-42, main NE stratigraphic section (courtesy Istituto Italiano di Paleontologia Umana [ISIPU]).
Figure 13. Arene Candide, field sketch of the upper part of the same section by Bernabò Brea (courtesy ISIPU).
Figure 14. A. Arene Candide, 1970 campaign
stratigraphic sketch by Cardini B. Stratigraphic sketch of 1968 Grotta Giovanna C excavations (from Pianese 1968-69).
Figure 16. Arene Candide, sketch plan of part of the Epigravettian graveyard by L. Cardini (courtesy ISIPU).
Figure 17. Arene Candide, photograph of grave VIII by L. Cardini (courtesy ISIPU).
Figure 18. Grotta Corrugi, Pachino (Sr), plan and stratigraphical section by Bernabò Brea 1945 (after Bernabò Brea 1949).
Figure 19. Lipari, Acropolis, stratigraphical section in the Insula IV (after Bernabò Brea and Cavalier 1980).
Figure 20. Lipari, Acropolis, stratigraphical section in the area oh Ausonian hut Alpha II (after Bernabò Brea and Cavalier 1980).
Figure 21. Scheme with the two 'parallel' lives of the two scholars.
Figure 22. Paolo Orsi (1859-1935).
Abstraction in Archaeological Stratigraphy: a Pyrenean Lineage of Innovation
Figure 1. Map of the archaeological sites and municipalities mentioned in the text.
Figure 2. The method used to record the position of objects by (Caso Andrade and Marquina, 1938: p. 269).
Figure 4. Graphic representation of the Cartesian grid used during the excavation of the Tute de Carrelore site by Laplace. The dots show the location of the objects uncovered (Laplace-Jauretche 1949: 228).
Figure 5. Illustration of two methods to record the location of an object during an excavation: above the surface level with reference to the plan Om
below the surface, with reference to the plan of the nm triangle (Laplace 1971, p. 228).
Figure 7. Annual cumulative sum of Laplace-Jauretche and Méroc 1954a, and Laplace 1971, citations (data: Google Scholar).
Figure 8. An 'analytical formula' representing the stratigraphy of the Cueva de Arrillor. The sign [] represents the stratigraphic structure, = the superposition of structures, {} the inclusion of structures, _ the structure in the case of composed expres
Primitif, précurseur, contemporain
Figure 1. Typologie des approches modernes de l'art paléolithique.
Compelling image-worlds
Figure 1. Selection of lithic imagery from the French subsample. (1) Diagram of idealized technological relationships including débitage modes, blank shapes, tool types and object frequencies (Bazile and Boccaccio 2008: fig. 26)
(2) artefact drawing with
Figure 2. Selection of lithic imagery from the Anglophone subsample. (1) Artefact photographs of specific point types with added contour lines and scar outlines (Blinkhorn et al. 2015: fig. 6)
(2) graph conveying the results of a discriminant function an.
Figure 3. Comparison of absolute frequency values of image sub-types recorded in the French and Anglophone sample. For an explanation of sub-type IDs, refer to Appendix 2.

New Advances in the History of Archaeology : : Proceedings of the XVIII UISPP World Congress (4-9 June 2018, Paris, France) Volume 16 (Sessions Organised by the History of Archaeology Scientific Commission at the XVIII World UISPP).

Similar Items