Challenges to conventional opinions on Qumran and Enoch issues / by Paul Heger.
Some literary expressions in the Dead Sea Scrolls led scholars to allege that their authors professed a dualistic and deterministic worldview of Zoroastrian origin and that the omission of Moses and Sinai from the Enoch writings evinces that a segment in Jewish society marginalized the Torah, adopti...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Studies on the texts of the desert of Judah, v. 100 |
|---|---|
| : | |
| Year of Publication: | 2012 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Studies on the texts of the desert of Judah ;
v. 100. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (429 p.) |
| Notes: | Description based upon print version of record. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Preliminary Material
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Rabbinic and Qumran Interpretation Systems
- 3.The Attribution ofModern Concepts to Authors and Readers of Ancient Texts
- 4. Enoch: Complementary or Alternative toMosaic Torah?
- 5. Jubilees and theMosaic Torah
- 6. Another Look at Dualism in QumranWritings
- 7. Against aTheory of Dual Determinism in 1QS and 1QHa
- 8. Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index of Citations
- Index of Subjects.