Positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights : : within and beyond boundaries / / Vladislava Stoyanova.

'Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights' provides novel insight into the elements underlying a state's responsibility to fulfil positive obligations. It is essential reading for academics, legal practitioners, and policymakers working across the diverse fie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Oxford scholarship online
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Oxford : : Oxford University Press,, 2023.
Year of Publication:2023
Edition:First edition.
Language:English
Series:Oxford scholarship online.
Physical Description:1 online resource (319 pages)
Notes:
  • This edition also issued in print: 2023.
  • "This is an open access publication, available online and distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)"--Title page verso.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Preface
  • Contents
  • Table of Cases
  • Introduction
  • 1 Deconstructing Positive Obligations
  • Introduction
  • 1.1 The State as an Institutional Mediator
  • 1.2 Justifications for Positive Obligations
  • 1.3 Plurality of Obligations Owed by the State
  • 1.4 Priority of Rights as Organizational Principles
  • 1.5 Trigger, Scope, Content, and Types of Positive Obligations
  • Conclusion
  • 2 State Knowledge
  • Introduction
  • 2.1 The Role of Fault in State Responsibility
  • 2.2 Triggering and Breach of Positive Obligations under ECHR
  • 2.3 Actual Knowledge versus Putative Knowledge
  • 2.3.1 Different Possible Ways of Assessing Putative Knowledge
  • 2.3.2 State Knowledge Necessarily Implies Normative Assessment
  • 2.4 Assessment of Knowledge
  • 2.5 No Benefit of Hindsight
  • 2.6 Burden of Proof
  • 2.7 The Nature and the Level of Risk
  • 2.7.1 The 'Real and Immediate Risk' Standard
  • 2.7.2 Man-made versus Natural Harms
  • 2.8 Contributory Fault of the Victim
  • Conclusion
  • 3 Causation
  • Introduction
  • 3.1 The Role and the Standard of Causation
  • 3.2 Control and Causation
  • 3.2.1 The Rules on Attribution
  • 3.2.2 The Role of Control and the Extension of the Logic of the Rules on Attribution
  • 3.2.3 Control and Prevention of State-inflicted Harm
  • 3.2.4 Assumption of Control in the Area of Public Services
  • 3.2.5 Source of the Harm and the Related Level of Control
  • 3.2.6 Assumption of Control over the Victim
  • 3.3 Techniques for Avoiding Causation
  • 3.3.1 Domestic Legality
  • 3.3.2 Procedural Protection
  • 3.4 Technique for Limiting Responsibility when Causation is Present
  • Conclusion
  • 4 Reasonableness
  • Introduction
  • 4.1 Intertwinement with Knowledge and Causation
  • 4.1.1 Weak Causation Counterbalanced by the Reasonableness Standard.
  • 4.1.2 Strong Causation Counterbalanced by the Reasonableness Standard
  • 4.1.3 Reasonableness and Immediacy of the Risk
  • 4.1.4 The Importance and the Justifiability of the Analytical Distinctions
  • 4.2 Consideration of Alternative Protective Measures
  • 4.2.1 Levels of Abstraction/Concreteness and the Burden of Proof
  • 4.2.2 Place and Formulation of the Alternative
  • 4.2.3 The Standard of Protectiveness
  • 4.3 Margin of Appreciation
  • 4.3.1 Delineation between Structural Deference and Appreciation of Alternatives
  • 4.3.2 Scrutiny in the Appreciation of Alternatives
  • Conclusion
  • 5 Competing Obligations
  • Introduction
  • 5.1 Specification for Tensions to Become Cognizable
  • 5.2 The Distinction between General Interests and Interests that Form the Basis of Human Rights
  • 5.3 Addressing the Competition
  • 5.3.1 Equal Moral Status
  • 5.3.2 The Relative Importance of the Interests and the Obligations Triggered
  • 5.3.3 Action versus Omission
  • 5.3.4 Determinacy of the Harm and the Affected Individuals
  • 5.4 Accommodation of Obligations
  • Conclusion
  • 6 Procedural Positive Obligation to Investigate
  • Introduction
  • 6.1 Conditions that Trigger the Obligation
  • 6.1.1 Harm Inflicted by State Actors
  • 6.1.2 Harm Inflicted by Non-state Actors
  • 6.1.3 Harm Linked with Arguable Omissions
  • 6.2 Content and Scope of the Obligation
  • 6.2.1 Type of Proceedings
  • 6.2.2 Initiation of the Proceedings
  • 6.2.3 Effectiveness
  • 6.2.4 Cooperation with Other States in Cross-border Contexts
  • Conclusion
  • 7 Substantive Positive Obligations
  • Introduction
  • 7.1 Obligation to Develop Effective Regulatory Frameworks
  • 7.1.1 Diversity of Regulatory Spheres and the Role of Criminal Law
  • 7.1.2 Types of Deficiencies in the Regulatory Framework
  • 7.1.3 Concrete or Abstract Reasonableness Review of the Regulatory Framework.
  • 7.2 Obligation to Develop Effective National Procedures
  • 7.2.1 Not a Self-standing Positive Obligation
  • 7.2.2 The Content of the Obligation
  • 7.3 Obligation to Take Protective Operational Measures
  • 7.3.1 The Test as Originally Developed in Osman v the United Kingdom
  • 7.3.2 Modifications of the Test Regarding the Actors of Harm, the Objects of Harm, and the Immediacy of the Risk
  • 7.3.3 Adjustment of the Test by Adding Risk Assessment as an 'Integral Part'
  • 7.3.4 Adjustment of the Test by Adding Harm-related, Temporal, and Geographical Specifications
  • 7.3.5 Content and Scope of the Obligation-the Operational Measures
  • Conclusion
  • 8 Extraterritorial Positive Obligations
  • Introduction
  • 8.1 Positive Obligations' Normative Preconditions
  • 8.1.1 The Role of the State in Society
  • 8.1.2 Democratic Legitimacy and Territorial Boundedness
  • 8.1.3 Not Contingent Exclusively on Actual Capacity
  • 8.2 Deconstructing Jurisdiction
  • 8.2.1 The Territorial Paradigm
  • 8.2.2 Effective Control over an Area
  • 8.2.3 Physical Power and Control over a Person
  • 8.2.4 Acts of Diplomatic and Consular Agents
  • 8.2.5 Exercise of Public Powers
  • 8.2.6 Extraterritorial Effects
  • 8.2.7 Procedural Link
  • 8.2.8 Conclusion
  • 8.3 Adapting Jurisdiction to the Obligations?
  • 8.3.1 Dividing and Tailoring
  • 8.3.2 Dividing the Tailoring Brought to a Breaking Point
  • 8.3.3 Conclusion
  • 8.4 Deconstructing Extraterritorial Positive Obligations
  • 8.4.1 Legality and Legal Competence
  • 8.4.2 Reasonableness and Balancing of Interests
  • 8.4.3 Causation
  • Conclusion
  • Conclusion
  • Select Bibliography
  • Index.