Authenticating criteria in Jesus research and beyond : : an interdisciplinary methodology / / Kevin B. Burr.
"Are the criteria of authenticity of Jesus research idiosyncratic to New Testament studies, vehicles of subjectivity, and fundamentally flawed vestiges of form criticism as some claim today? If so, why do opponents of the criteria-approach still use them? Or, are the criteria the tools of gener...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Biblical Interpretation Series ; 219 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Leiden : : BRILL,, 2023. |
Year of Publication: | 2023 |
Edition: | 1st ed. |
Language: | English |
Series: | Biblical interpretation series ;
219. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xi, 250 pages). |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
LEADER | 01943nam a2200337 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 993628768904498 | ||
005 | 20240126111709.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
008 | 240126s2023 ne ob 000 0 eng d | ||
020 | |a 90-04-54902-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/9789004549029 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (CKB)5850000000447004 | ||
035 | |a (NjHacI)995850000000447004 | ||
035 | |a (MiAaPQ)EBC31219162 | ||
035 | |a (Au-PeEL)EBL31219162 | ||
035 | |a (EXLCZ)995850000000447004 | ||
040 | |a NjHacI |b eng |e rda |c NjHacl | ||
050 | 4 | |a BS2351.E47 |b .B877 2023 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 220.6092 |2 23 |
100 | 1 | |a Burr, Kevin B., |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Authenticating criteria in Jesus research and beyond : |b an interdisciplinary methodology / |c Kevin B. Burr. |
250 | |a 1st ed. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Leiden : |b BRILL, |c 2023. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 250 pages). | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Biblical Interpretation Series ; |v 219 | |
588 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. | ||
520 | |a "Are the criteria of authenticity of Jesus research idiosyncratic to New Testament studies, vehicles of subjectivity, and fundamentally flawed vestiges of form criticism as some claim today? If so, why do opponents of the criteria-approach still use them? Or, are the criteria the tools of general historiography as others assert? If true, none have adequately demonstrated where and how principles such as multiple attestation, general and historical coherence, dissimilarity and embarrassment feature in general historiographic method-until now. This study analyzes the methods of general historians and Jesus researchers (who favor or oppose the criteria) and demonstrates that, regardless of sub-discipline, authenticating criteria are inherent to the practice of historiography"-- |c Provided by publisher. | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliography. | ||
505 | 0 | |a 1. Decades of discussion on authenticating criteria in historical Jesus research -- 2. Authenticating criteria in general historical method -- 3. Historical Jesus scholars' use of authenticating criteria : a test case on Jesus's trial(s) -- 4. The use of authenticating criteria among modern historians of Greco-Roman antiquity : a test case on Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon -- 5. Interdisciplinary application of authenticating criteria and further implications. | |
650 | 0 | |a New Testament scholars. | |
600 | 0 | 0 | |a Jesus Christ |x Historicity. |
600 | 0 | 6 | |a Jésus-Christ |x Historicité. |
776 | |z 90-04-54901-3 | ||
830 | 0 | |a Biblical interpretation series ; |v 219. | |
906 | |a BOOK | ||
ADM | |b 2024-06-29 03:11:05 Europe/Vienna |f system |c marc21 |a 2023-10-29 07:25:14 Europe/Vienna |g false | ||
AVE | |i Brill |P EBA Brill All |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5350545740004498&Force_direct=true |Z 5350545740004498 |b Available |8 5350545740004498 |