The Making of Constitutional Democracy: : Creation and application of law : a neglected distinction / / Paolo Sandro.

"This book investigates the conceptual structure of the distinction between creation and application of law, ranging widely across philosophy of law and philosophy of language, and incorporating a substantial discussion of the historical and philosophical foundations of administrative law. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Law and Practical Reason
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:[Place of publication not identified], : HART Publishing,, 2017.
[London, England] : : Bloomsbury Publishing,, 2021
Year of Publication:2017
Edition:First edition.
Language:English
Series:Law and Practical Reason
Physical Description:1 online resource (331 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Acknowledgements
  • Contents
  • Introduction
  • I. Aims and structure of the work
  • 1. Law, Power, and Political Authority. On the Scope and Limitations of the Work
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Brief Methodological Remarks
  • III. The Province of the problem Determined: What is Law?
  • IV. Politics, Political Power, Political Authority
  • V. From Powers to Power. The Familiar Tale of the Ineluctability of the State
  • VI. The Conditions of Existence of Political Authority: insights from the theory of normative orders
  • 2. The Dependence of Constitutional Democracy on the Distinction between Creation and Application of Law
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The Contested Relationship between Law and Politics
  • III. Law as lex and as ius: the duality that makes constitutionalism possible
  • IV. From constitutions to constitutionalism: narrowing the focus of constitutional theory
  • V. The (proverbial) tension between democracy and constitutionalism
  • VI. Modern constitutionalism as 'legal otherness'
  • VII. The two-fold justificatory dependence of constitutional democracy on the idea of application of law
  • 3. A Critical Evaluation of Moderate Legal Realism
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Realism vs formalism
  • III. Let us be realist about adjudication. What do judges eat for breakfast?
  • IV. Realism and realisms in law: meta-theory
  • V. The lowest common denominator of legal realism
  • VI. The two axes of rule-scepticism
  • VII. The unbearable lightness of moderate scepticism
  • VIII. On the normativity of law, and on the digestion of judges
  • 4. Towards a Unified Account of Discretion in Law
  • I. Introduction
  • II. HLA Hart and the concept of discretion. Back to the future?
  • III. Dworkin and the (normative) no-strong-discretion thesis
  • IV. Discretion as a pervasive feature of Kelsen's Stufenbaulehre.
  • V. Discretion as balancing in Klatt (and Alexy)
  • VI. The history of discretion in the administrative domain
  • VII. Administrative discretion in Germany
  • VIII. Discretion in the French-Italian administrative tradition
  • IX. The concept of discretion in English administrative law
  • X. Towards a unified account of discretion in law
  • XI. Conclusion
  • 5. Law and Language and as Language. An Alternative Picture of a Multifaceted Relationship
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The communicative model of law. A two-way affair?
  • III. Beyond 'what is said'. Speech-act theory and the rise of pragmatics in legal interpretation
  • IV. First objection: law as language, law and language(s)
  • V. Second objection: speech-act vs text-act theory
  • VI. Legal texts as 'autonomous' text-acts
  • VII. An alternative theory of legal meaning: semantic minimalism
  • VIII. Prolegomena to a theory of legal interpretation
  • IX. Conclusion
  • 6. Creation and Application of Law. An Analytical Distinction
  • I. Introduction
  • II. The two extremes: rejecting vs assuming the distinction
  • III. Kelsen on the relativity of the distinction between creation and application of law
  • IV. Creation of law: of the typicality of legal rules
  • V. The principle of legality as a (semantic) meta-norm on law-creation and law-application
  • VI. Unpacking the idea of 'application of law'
  • VII. The potential asymmetry between norm-following and norm-application
  • VIII. On the (different) normativity of power-conferring norms
  • IX. Can only officials apply the law?
  • X. Form and substance. Towards an analytical account of law-application
  • XI. Conclusion
  • XII. PS One final objection: interpretation, interpretation, interpretation!
  • 7. The Separation of Powers. A Meta-theoretical Reassessment
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Genealogical issues. When was the separation of powers 'invented'?.
  • III. A twofold meta-theoretical ambiguity plaguing the discussion
  • IV. The justificatory debate. Monism vs pluralism
  • V. Critical approaches
  • VI. The separation of powers as a formal theory and as a normative doctrine. On the advantages of maintaining a strict distinction
  • VII. Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Index.