Justice and food security in a changing climate : : EurSafe 2021, Fribourg, Switzerland, 24-26 June 2021 / / edited by Hanna Schübel, Ivo Wallimann-Helmer.

The UN's Sustainable Development Goals saw the global community agree to end hunger and malnutrition in all its forms by 2030. However, the number of chronically undernourished people is increasing continuously. Ongoing climate change and the action needed to adapt to it are very likely to aggr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Wageningen, Netherlands : : Wageningen Academic Publishers,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (438 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Table of contents
  • Acknowledgments
  • Reviewers
  • Agriculture and ethical imperatives in a changing climate
  • K. Millar
  • Introduction: Justice and food security in a changing climate
  • I. Wallimann-Helmer and H. Schübel
  • Section 1. Keynote papers: the climate change challenge to food security
  • 1. Food justice, food security, and climate engineering
  • T. Kortetmäki
  • 2. Adapting agriculture to a changing climate: a social justice perspective
  • C. Timmermann
  • 3. The climate emergency: elements of a repair of the future
  • A. Kallhoff
  • 4. Networked climate sovereignties: linking agroecology, food sovereignty, and climate justice
  • G.A. Aistara
  • Section 2. Climate mitigation, geoengineering, and food security
  • 5. Vegetable farming, climate change, and food security in the Arctic
  • D.L. Friedrich1,2
  • 6. A Lockean approach to justice for food security under global climate change
  • A. Inoue
  • 7. Animals and climate change
  • C.E. Blattner1* and E. Meijer2
  • 8. Food security and the moral differences between climate mitigation and geoengineering: the case of biofuels and BECCS
  • H. Schübel* and I. Wallimann-Helmer
  • 9. Ecofeminism, afforestation &amp
  • La Via Campesina
  • E. Woodhouse
  • Section 3. Adapting agriculture to sustain food security
  • 10. Who owns the taste of coffee - examining implications of biobased means of production in food
  • Z.H. Robaey1* and C. Timmermann2
  • 11. Food security and cultural identity in agricultural adaptation - a trade-off?
  • T. Carrillo* and I. Wallimann-Helmer
  • 12. Inclusive biobased value chains: building on local capabilities
  • L. Asveld1*, Z.H. Robaey2 and S. Francke3
  • 13. The loss of food sovereignty in synthetic meat transition: a critique from eco-republican justice
  • C. Moyano Fernández
  • 14. Climate adaptation limits and the right to food security.
  • I. Wallimann-Helmer1*, L.M. Bouwer2, C. Huggel3, S. Juhola4, R. Mechler5 and V. Muccione3
  • 15. How to techno-fix climate change problems in winemaking - and legitimately get away with it
  • R. Nydal
  • 16. Policy and institutional responses to climate change and food security in Bangladesh
  • M.H.I. Khan and M. Das Gupta*
  • 17. A water culture perspective for food security
  • S. Meisch1,2* and S. Bremer1
  • 18. Agricultural resilience and wine production: a value analysis
  • G. De Grandis
  • 19. Producing food in a fragile food system - a case study on Isle of Skye, Scotland
  • A. Bruce1*, D.M. Bruce2, I. Fletcher1 and C. Lamprinopoulou1
  • 20. Interpreting 'ethics' in IPCC AR5: insights for agricultural adaptation to climate change
  • A. Voisard
  • 21. Implications for animal welfare of food system changes towards circular agriculture
  • F.L.B. Meijboom1,2, J. Staman1*, R. Pothoven1 and I.J.M. de Boer1,3
  • 22. Developing principles and criteria for just transition in food systems: a transdisciplinary endeavour
  • T. Tribaldos1* and T. Kortetmäki2
  • 23. Eco-anthropological tools to improve food self-sufficiency through the use of wild edible plants
  • L. Benoit1*, É. Olmedo2 and B. Chen3
  • 24. Is a thriving food sovereignty-based global future plausible?
  • Y. Saghai
  • 25. Exploring alternative food futures through critical design
  • T. Antonsen1,2* and J.M. McGowan1,3
  • Section 4. Animal ethics, veterinary ethics, and food security
  • 26. The political turn of the animal ethical discourse - the need for a virtue ethical approach
  • E. van den Brandeler
  • 27. Kantian animal ethics: it's necessity, aims and disturbance
  • S. Camenzind
  • 28. Relating morally to farmed salmon - fellow creatures and biomass
  • H.M. Sandvik* and B.K. Myskja
  • 29. Respect and intrinsic value - Kantian reconstructions of key terms in Norway's Animal Welfare Act.
  • M.F. Trøite and B.K. Myskja*
  • 30. Don't push away your emotions - Cora Diamond and animal ethics
  • A. Aigner
  • 31. Meat provocation - can animal ethics actually rest on rational arguments?
  • M. Huth1* and M.E. Hodec2,3
  • 32. The ethics and mindedness of insects
  • M.S. van Loon* and B. Bovenkerk
  • 33. What if we lack a licence to kill - thinking out-of-the-box in our relationship with liminal rodents
  • M.A.A.M. van Gerwen1*, J. Nieuwland1,2 and F.L.B. Meijboom1,2,3
  • 34. Viennese hamsters and the interspecies politics of urban space
  • B. Kristensen
  • 35. Four models of the veterinarian - owner relationship
  • M. Huth
  • 36. Shifting from 'cure' to 'care' - theoretical considerations of small animal hospice and palliative care
  • S. Springer1* and S. Axiak Flammer2
  • 37. Veterinarians as protectors of animals - caring and killing in the narratives of vet students
  • M.J. Bubeck
  • 38. Killing in plural? On animal life assessments by veterinarians and the role of euthanasia
  • E. Deelen* and F.L.B. Meijboom
  • 39. Small animals, big decisions: potential of moral case deliberation for a small animal hospital on the basis of an observational study
  • M. Long1*, S. Springer1, I.A. Burgener2 and H. Grimm1
  • 40. To heal, to advise, to criticise? A German farm veterinarians and their self-perception
  • C. Dürnberger
  • 41. Vetsplaining - dealing with uncertainty as inescapable part of veterinary practice
  • J. Karg* and H. Grimm
  • 42. Intensive animal agriculture, land-use and biological conservation: converging demands of justice
  • A. Wienhues1* and S. Hirth2
  • 43. Whose interest matters when regulating animal welfare? A Swedish case study
  • F. Lundmark Hedman1*, C. Berg1 and M. Stéen2
  • 44. Citizen views on welfare and rights of farmed animals in food production
  • M. Niva1* and J. Mäkelä2.
  • 45. What should we breed cattle for - engaging publics in a Democs card game
  • D.M. Bruce1* and A. Bruce2
  • 46. Public engagement in biotechnology innovation - the need for research and the role of ethics
  • S.G. Carson1*, B.K. Myskja1 and A.I. Myhr2
  • 47. Openness: terroir and the value of the natural
  • L. Ursin
  • 48. Animal business: an exploration of corporate responsibility towards animals
  • M.R.E. Janssens
  • 49. Visions of gene technology
  • S. Kjeldaas* and T. Antonsen
  • 50. Hornless cattle - is gene editing the best solution?
  • P. Sandøe1,2*, S. Borchersen3, W. Dean1, P. Hyttel2, L.P. Sørensen3 and C. Palmer4
  • 51. Genome edited salmon: fish welfare as part of sustainability criteria
  • T. Blix* and A.I. Myhr
  • 52. An agent-centred approach to innovation for 21st century challenges of agriculture
  • Z.H. Robaey1 and P. Sandin2
  • 53. Vegan food system and biodiversity: an ethical analysis
  • M. Oksanen1* and T. Kortetmäki2
  • Section 5. Methodology and further challenges to environmental ethics
  • 54. Food security and symbolic legislation in Switzerland: a false sense of security?
  • C.E. Blattner1* and O. Ammann2
  • 55. Rights for rivers
  • M. Hansche1 and S. Meisch1,2*
  • 56. More than life-sustaining resources - on the integrity argument for natural resources
  • S.I. Espinosa Flor
  • 57. The ethical sustainability matrix: a practical tool for assessment of GMOs including genome-edited organisms
  • T. Dassler* and A.I. Myhr
  • 58. 'What is wrong with the EAT Lancet report?'
  • M. Kaiser
  • 59. Empirical ethics is not a magic bullet for applied ethicists
  • R.B. Mikkelsen1*, P. Sandøe1,2 and M. Gjerris2
  • 60. Coating moral misconduct - the motivational function of shame in ethical debates
  • K. Dieck* and H. Grimm
  • 61. Normativity in applied ethics teaching: not to have, nice to have, or need to have?.
  • C. Gamborg* and M. Gjerris
  • Section 6. Covid-19: new directions for ethics and food security?
  • 62. Chat with your vet! Covid 19 and veterinary tele-medicine
  • K.L. Weich
  • 63. Epidemics and food security: the duties of local and international communities
  • A.K. Martin
  • 64. The ethics of intensive agriculture: lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic
  • O. Torpman* and H. Röcklinsberg
  • 65. Food insecurity, deepened poverty and ethics after Covid-19
  • A. Inza-Bartolomé1* and L. Escajedo San-Epifanio2
  • 66. The eclipse of sharing within food ethics: unearthing blind spots during the Covid-19 pandemic
  • R. Anthony
  • Author index.