The position of Roman slaves : : social realities and legal differences / / edited by Martin Schermaier.

Slaves were property of their dominus, objects rather than persons, without rights: These are some components of our basic knowledge about Roman slavery. But Roman slavery was more diverse than we might assume from the standard wording about servile legal status. Numerous inscriptions as well as lit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Dependency and slavery studies, Volume 6
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Berlin ;, Boston : : De Gruyter,, [2023]
Year of Publication:2023
Language:English
Series:Dependency and slavery studies ; Volume 6.
Physical Description:1 online resource (vi, 310 pages).
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 02396nam a2200325 i 4500
001 993610569604498
005 20230811124251.0
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 230811s2023 gw ob 001 0 eng d
035 |a (CKB)5580000000553587 
035 |a (NjHacI)995580000000553587 
035 |a (EXLCZ)995580000000553587 
040 |a NjHacI  |b eng  |e rda  |c NjHacl 
043 |a ff-----  |a e------  |a aw----- 
050 4 |a HT863  |b .P675 2023 
082 0 4 |a 306.362  |2 23 
245 0 4 |a The position of Roman slaves :  |b social realities and legal differences /  |c edited by Martin Schermaier. 
264 1 |a Berlin ;  |a Boston :  |b De Gruyter,  |c [2023] 
300 |a 1 online resource (vi, 310 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Dependency and slavery studies,  |x 2701-1127 ;  |v Volume 6 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
520 |a Slaves were property of their dominus, objects rather than persons, without rights: These are some components of our basic knowledge about Roman slavery. But Roman slavery was more diverse than we might assume from the standard wording about servile legal status. Numerous inscriptions as well as literary and legal sources reveal clear differences in the social structure of Roman slavery. There were numerous groups and professions who shared the status of being unfree while inhabiting very different worlds.00The papers in this volume pose the question of whether and how legal texts reflected such social differences within the Roman servile community. Did the legal system reinscribe social differences, and if so, in what shape? Were exceptions created only in individual cases, or did the legal system generate privileges for particular groups of slaves? Did it reinforce and even promote social differentiation? All papers probe neuralgic points that are apt to challenge the homogeneous image of Roman slave law. They show that this law was a good deal more colourful than historical research has so far assumed. The authors? primary concern is to make this legal diversity accessible to historical scholarship. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 269-296) and index. 
650 0 |a Enslaved persons  |z Rome  |x Social conditions. 
776 |z 3-11-098722-8 
700 1 |a Schermaier, Martin Josef,  |e editor. 
830 0 |a Dependency and slavery studies ;  |v Volume 6. 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2023-08-18 03:31:45 Europe/Vienna  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2023-07-01 21:33:43 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5346850210004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5346850210004498  |b Available  |8 5346850210004498