Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni
Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Studi e saggi |
---|---|
: | |
Year of Publication: | 2012 |
Language: | Italian |
Series: | Studi e saggi
|
Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (194 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993603833004498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)5860000000047127 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83531 (EXLCZ)995860000000047127 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
CARUSO, SERGIO auth Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni Firenze Firenze University Press 2012 1 electronic resource (194 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Studi e saggi Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the methodological hypotheses, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the weak anthropologies, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the extreme versions, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness. Italian Social & political philosophy bicssc 88-6655-109-0 |
language |
Italian |
format |
eBook |
author |
CARUSO, SERGIO |
spellingShingle |
CARUSO, SERGIO Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni Studi e saggi |
author_facet |
CARUSO, SERGIO |
author_variant |
s c sc |
author_sort |
CARUSO, SERGIO |
title |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_full |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_fullStr |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_full_unstemmed |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_auth |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_new |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
title_sort |
homo oeconomicus. paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
series |
Studi e saggi |
series2 |
Studi e saggi |
publisher |
Firenze University Press |
publishDate |
2012 |
physical |
1 electronic resource (194 p.) |
isbn |
88-6655-109-0 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carusosergio homooeconomicusparadigmacriticherevisioni |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)5860000000047127 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83531 (EXLCZ)995860000000047127 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Studi e saggi |
is_hierarchy_title |
Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
container_title |
Studi e saggi |
_version_ |
1796653250501410817 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01739nam-a2200277z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993603833004498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230221130708.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202206s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)5860000000047127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83531</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)995860000000047127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ita</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CARUSO, SERGIO</subfield><subfield code="4">auth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Firenze</subfield><subfield code="b">Firenze University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (194 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studi e saggi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the methodological hypotheses, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the weak anthropologies, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the extreme versions, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Italian</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Social & political philosophy</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">88-6655-109-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-06-09 12:49:54 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">System</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2022-06-08 16:08:14 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5337670440004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5337670440004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5337670440004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |