Judicial rhapsodies : : rhetoric and fundamental rights in the Supreme Court / / Doug Coulson

All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Sup...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
VerfasserIn:
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:[Amherst, MA] : : Amherst College Press,, 2023.
©2023
Year of Publication:2023
Language:English
Physical Description:1 online resource (viii, 276 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Supreme Court justices have used to justify fundamental rights decisions. Doug Coulson demonstrates that such "judicial rhapsodies" are not an aberration but a central feature of judicial discourse. First examining the classical origins of divisions between law and rhetoric, Coulson tracks what he calls an epideictic register--highly affective forms of expression that utilize hyperbole, amplification, and vocabularies of praise--through a surprising number of landmark Supreme Court opinions. Judicial Rhapsodies recovers and revalues these instances as significant to establishing and maintaining shared perspectives that form the basis for common experience and cooperation.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references (pages 239 -256) and index.
ISBN:9781943208470
Access:Open access.
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: Doug Coulson