Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : : a comparative perspective / / Karolina Kremens.

"This comparative analysis examines the scope of prosecutorial powers at different phases of criminal investigation in four countries: the United States, Italy, Poland, and Germany. In all of these countries, where the majority of cases are decided by forms of adjudication in which judges are o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:New York, New York ;, London : : Routledge,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4.
Physical Description:1 online resource (379 pages).
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993599228404498
ctrlnum (CKB)5590000000442251
(MiAaPQ)EBC6527632
(Au-PeEL)EBL6527632
(OCoLC)1244631111
(EXLCZ)995590000000442251
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Kremens, Karolina, author.
Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective / Karolina Kremens.
1st ed.
New York, New York ; London : Routledge, [2021]
©2021
1 online resource (379 pages).
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4
Description based on print version record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Vanishing Trials -- 1.2 State of the Art On the (almost) Unlimited Powers of the Prosecutor in Criminal Proceedings -- 1.3 Aim of the Study -- 1.4 Scope of the Study -- 1.5 Methodology of the Study -- 1.6 Structure of the Study -- References -- Chapter 2 Prosecution Systems Compared -- 2.1 General Considerations -- 2.2 The Prosecution Service in Germany -- 2.2.1 Sources of Law Governing the German Prosecution Service -- 2.2.2 The Position of the German Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.2.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the German Prosecution Service -- 2.3 The Prosecution System in Poland -- 2.3.1 Sources of Law Governing the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.3.2 The Position of the Polish Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.3.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.4 The Prosecution System in Italy -- 2.4.1 Sources of Law Governing the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.4.2 The Position of the Italian Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.4.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.5 The Prosecution System in the United States of America -- 2.5.1 Sources of Law Governing the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.5.2 The Position of the Us Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.5.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 3 Criminal Investigations Compared -- 3.1 General Considerations.
3.2 Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 3.2.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.2.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.2.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.3 Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 3.3.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.3.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.3.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.4 Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 3.4.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.4.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.4.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.5 Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 3.5.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.5.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.5.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 4 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Initiation of Investigation -- 4.1 General Considerations -- 4.2 Initiating Investigation in Germany -- 4.2.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3 Initiating Investigation in Poland -- 4.3.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4 Initiating Investigation in Italy -- 4.4.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5 Initiating Investigation in the United States of America -- 4.5.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 5 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.1 General Considerations -- 5.2 Conduct of Investigation in Germany -- 5.2.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police.
5.2.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.2.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.2.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of investigation -- 5.2.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3 Conduct of Investigation in Poland -- 5.3.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.3.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.3.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.3.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4 Conduct of Investigation in Italy -- 5.4.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.4.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.4.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.4.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5 Conduct of Investigation in the United States of America -- 5.5.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.5.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.5.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.5.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 6 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Preliminary Charging -- 6.1 General Considerations -- 6.2 Preliminary Charging in Germany -- 6.2.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.2.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3 Preliminary Charging in Poland -- 6.3.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.3.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging.
6.3.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4 Preliminary Charging in Italy -- 6.4.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.4.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5 Preliminary Charging in the United States of America -- 6.5.1 General Considerations Regarding Charging Decisions -- 6.5.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 7 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Imposition of Coercive Measures -- 7.1 General Considerations -- 7.2 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Germany -- 7.2.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.2.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.2.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.3 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Poland -- 7.3.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.3.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.3.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.4 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Italy -- 7.4.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.4.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.4.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.5 Imposition of Coercive Measures in the united States of America -- 7.5.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.5.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.5.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 8 Prosecutor's Powers to discontinue Investigation -- 8.1 General Considerations -- 8.2 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 8.2.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.2.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation.
8.2.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.3 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 8.3.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.3.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.3.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.4 Discontinuation of the Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 8.4.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.4.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.4.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.5 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 8.5.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.5.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.5.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 9 Redefining Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.1 Criminal Investigation Remastered -- 9.2 Prospects For Shaping Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.3 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Index.
"This comparative analysis examines the scope of prosecutorial powers at different phases of criminal investigation in four countries: the United States, Italy, Poland, and Germany. In all of these countries, where the majority of cases are decided by forms of adjudication in which judges are often called to just confirm agreements achieved between parties, the criminal investigation has become a central point of the criminal process. It is important to make a conscience determination regarding who shall be in charge of this stage of the process. Prosecutors have gained tremendous powers to influence the outcome of the criminal cases, including powers once reserved only for judges. The book attempts to answer the question of whether in the system in which the role of the trial is diminishing, and where the significance of criminal investigation is constantly growing, should the powers of the prosecutor at the early stage of the process be enhanced. Using a problem-oriented approach that begins with the identification of a problem and then looks for potential common solutions, the book provides a parallel analysis of each country along five possible spheres of prosecutorial engagement: commencing criminal investigation, conducting criminal investigation, undertaking the initial charging decision, imposing coercive measures and discontinuing criminal investigation. Using the competing models of the adversarial versus inquisitorial approach as a framework, the focus is on the prosecutor as a crucial figure of criminal process and investigation to various degrees in different systems. The insights of this comparative treatment are relevant to students and academics in criminal justice, criminology, law, and public policy, as well as policymakers, government officials, and others interested in legal reform"-- Provided by publisher.
Public prosecutors United States.
0-367-86294-8
Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4.
language English
format eBook
author Kremens, Karolina,
spellingShingle Kremens, Karolina,
Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective /
Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ;
Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Vanishing Trials -- 1.2 State of the Art On the (almost) Unlimited Powers of the Prosecutor in Criminal Proceedings -- 1.3 Aim of the Study -- 1.4 Scope of the Study -- 1.5 Methodology of the Study -- 1.6 Structure of the Study -- References -- Chapter 2 Prosecution Systems Compared -- 2.1 General Considerations -- 2.2 The Prosecution Service in Germany -- 2.2.1 Sources of Law Governing the German Prosecution Service -- 2.2.2 The Position of the German Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.2.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the German Prosecution Service -- 2.3 The Prosecution System in Poland -- 2.3.1 Sources of Law Governing the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.3.2 The Position of the Polish Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.3.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.4 The Prosecution System in Italy -- 2.4.1 Sources of Law Governing the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.4.2 The Position of the Italian Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.4.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.5 The Prosecution System in the United States of America -- 2.5.1 Sources of Law Governing the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.5.2 The Position of the Us Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.5.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 3 Criminal Investigations Compared -- 3.1 General Considerations.
3.2 Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 3.2.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.2.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.2.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.3 Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 3.3.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.3.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.3.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.4 Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 3.4.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.4.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.4.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.5 Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 3.5.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.5.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.5.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 4 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Initiation of Investigation -- 4.1 General Considerations -- 4.2 Initiating Investigation in Germany -- 4.2.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3 Initiating Investigation in Poland -- 4.3.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4 Initiating Investigation in Italy -- 4.4.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5 Initiating Investigation in the United States of America -- 4.5.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 5 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.1 General Considerations -- 5.2 Conduct of Investigation in Germany -- 5.2.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police.
5.2.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.2.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.2.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of investigation -- 5.2.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3 Conduct of Investigation in Poland -- 5.3.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.3.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.3.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.3.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4 Conduct of Investigation in Italy -- 5.4.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.4.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.4.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.4.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5 Conduct of Investigation in the United States of America -- 5.5.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.5.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.5.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.5.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 6 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Preliminary Charging -- 6.1 General Considerations -- 6.2 Preliminary Charging in Germany -- 6.2.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.2.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3 Preliminary Charging in Poland -- 6.3.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.3.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging.
6.3.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4 Preliminary Charging in Italy -- 6.4.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.4.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5 Preliminary Charging in the United States of America -- 6.5.1 General Considerations Regarding Charging Decisions -- 6.5.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 7 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Imposition of Coercive Measures -- 7.1 General Considerations -- 7.2 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Germany -- 7.2.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.2.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.2.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.3 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Poland -- 7.3.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.3.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.3.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.4 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Italy -- 7.4.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.4.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.4.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.5 Imposition of Coercive Measures in the united States of America -- 7.5.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.5.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.5.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 8 Prosecutor's Powers to discontinue Investigation -- 8.1 General Considerations -- 8.2 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 8.2.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.2.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation.
8.2.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.3 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 8.3.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.3.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.3.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.4 Discontinuation of the Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 8.4.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.4.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.4.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.5 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 8.5.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.5.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.5.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 9 Redefining Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.1 Criminal Investigation Remastered -- 9.2 Prospects For Shaping Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.3 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Index.
author_facet Kremens, Karolina,
author_variant k k kk
author_role VerfasserIn
author_sort Kremens, Karolina,
title Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective /
title_sub a comparative perspective /
title_full Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective / Karolina Kremens.
title_fullStr Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective / Karolina Kremens.
title_full_unstemmed Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective / Karolina Kremens.
title_auth Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective /
title_new Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation :
title_sort powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective /
series Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ;
series2 Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ;
publisher Routledge,
publishDate 2021
physical 1 online resource (379 pages).
edition 1st ed.
contents Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Vanishing Trials -- 1.2 State of the Art On the (almost) Unlimited Powers of the Prosecutor in Criminal Proceedings -- 1.3 Aim of the Study -- 1.4 Scope of the Study -- 1.5 Methodology of the Study -- 1.6 Structure of the Study -- References -- Chapter 2 Prosecution Systems Compared -- 2.1 General Considerations -- 2.2 The Prosecution Service in Germany -- 2.2.1 Sources of Law Governing the German Prosecution Service -- 2.2.2 The Position of the German Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.2.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the German Prosecution Service -- 2.3 The Prosecution System in Poland -- 2.3.1 Sources of Law Governing the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.3.2 The Position of the Polish Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.3.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.4 The Prosecution System in Italy -- 2.4.1 Sources of Law Governing the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.4.2 The Position of the Italian Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.4.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.5 The Prosecution System in the United States of America -- 2.5.1 Sources of Law Governing the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.5.2 The Position of the Us Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.5.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 3 Criminal Investigations Compared -- 3.1 General Considerations.
3.2 Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 3.2.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.2.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.2.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.3 Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 3.3.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.3.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.3.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.4 Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 3.4.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.4.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.4.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.5 Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 3.5.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.5.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.5.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 4 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Initiation of Investigation -- 4.1 General Considerations -- 4.2 Initiating Investigation in Germany -- 4.2.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3 Initiating Investigation in Poland -- 4.3.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4 Initiating Investigation in Italy -- 4.4.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5 Initiating Investigation in the United States of America -- 4.5.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 5 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.1 General Considerations -- 5.2 Conduct of Investigation in Germany -- 5.2.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police.
5.2.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.2.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.2.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of investigation -- 5.2.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3 Conduct of Investigation in Poland -- 5.3.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.3.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.3.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.3.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4 Conduct of Investigation in Italy -- 5.4.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.4.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.4.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.4.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5 Conduct of Investigation in the United States of America -- 5.5.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.5.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.5.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.5.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 6 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Preliminary Charging -- 6.1 General Considerations -- 6.2 Preliminary Charging in Germany -- 6.2.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.2.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3 Preliminary Charging in Poland -- 6.3.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.3.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging.
6.3.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4 Preliminary Charging in Italy -- 6.4.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.4.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5 Preliminary Charging in the United States of America -- 6.5.1 General Considerations Regarding Charging Decisions -- 6.5.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 7 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Imposition of Coercive Measures -- 7.1 General Considerations -- 7.2 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Germany -- 7.2.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.2.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.2.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.3 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Poland -- 7.3.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.3.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.3.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.4 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Italy -- 7.4.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.4.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.4.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.5 Imposition of Coercive Measures in the united States of America -- 7.5.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.5.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.5.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 8 Prosecutor's Powers to discontinue Investigation -- 8.1 General Considerations -- 8.2 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 8.2.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.2.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation.
8.2.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.3 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 8.3.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.3.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.3.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.4 Discontinuation of the Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 8.4.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.4.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.4.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.5 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 8.5.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.5.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.5.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 9 Redefining Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.1 Criminal Investigation Remastered -- 9.2 Prospects For Shaping Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.3 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Index.
isbn 1-00-301824-6
1-000-29108-1
1-003-01824-6
0-367-86294-8
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-subject KF - United States
callnumber-label KF9640
callnumber-sort KF 49640 K746 42021
geographic_facet United States.
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 340 - Law
dewey-ones 345 - Criminal law
dewey-full 345.7301
345.401262
dewey-sort 3345.7301
dewey-raw 345.7301
345.401262
dewey-search 345.7301
345.401262
oclc_num 1244631111
work_keys_str_mv AT kremenskarolina powersoftheprosecutorincriminalinvestigationacomparativeperspective
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)5590000000442251
(MiAaPQ)EBC6527632
(Au-PeEL)EBL6527632
(OCoLC)1244631111
(EXLCZ)995590000000442251
carrierType_str_mv cr
hierarchy_parent_title Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4
hierarchy_sequence 4.
is_hierarchy_title Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation : a comparative perspective /
container_title Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ; 4
_version_ 1804802316899975168
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>11823nam a2200505 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993599228404498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240513180912.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr#cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">211014s2021 nyu ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1-00-301824-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1-000-29108-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1-003-01824-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)5590000000442251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC6527632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL6527632</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1244631111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)995590000000442251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">n-us---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KF9640</subfield><subfield code="b">.K746 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.7301</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.401262</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kremens, Karolina,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Powers of the prosecutor in criminal investigation :</subfield><subfield code="b">a comparative perspective /</subfield><subfield code="c">Karolina Kremens.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, New York ;</subfield><subfield code="a">London :</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (379 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Vanishing Trials -- 1.2 State of the Art On the (almost) Unlimited Powers of the Prosecutor in Criminal Proceedings -- 1.3 Aim of the Study -- 1.4 Scope of the Study -- 1.5 Methodology of the Study -- 1.6 Structure of the Study -- References -- Chapter 2 Prosecution Systems Compared -- 2.1 General Considerations -- 2.2 The Prosecution Service in Germany -- 2.2.1 Sources of Law Governing the German Prosecution Service -- 2.2.2 The Position of the German Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.2.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the German Prosecution Service -- 2.3 The Prosecution System in Poland -- 2.3.1 Sources of Law Governing the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.3.2 The Position of the Polish Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.3.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Polish Prosecution Service -- 2.4 The Prosecution System in Italy -- 2.4.1 Sources of Law Governing the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.4.2 The Position of the Italian Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.4.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Italian Prosecution Service -- 2.5 The Prosecution System in the United States of America -- 2.5.1 Sources of Law Governing the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.5.2 The Position of the Us Prosecution Service in Relation to the Judiciary and Executive -- 2.5.3 The Internal Independence of the Prosecutor Within the Structure of the Us Prosecution Service -- 2.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 3 Criminal Investigations Compared -- 3.1 General Considerations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.2 Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 3.2.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.2.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.2.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.3 Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 3.3.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.3.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.3.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.4 Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 3.4.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.4.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.4.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.5 Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 3.5.1 The Notion and Outline of Criminal Investigation -- 3.5.2 Prosecutorial Discretion -- 3.5.3 Prosecutorial Objectivity -- 3.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 4 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Initiation of Investigation -- 4.1 General Considerations -- 4.2 Initiating Investigation in Germany -- 4.2.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.2.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3 Initiating Investigation in Poland -- 4.3.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.3.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4 Initiating Investigation in Italy -- 4.4.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.4.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5 Initiating Investigation in the United States of America -- 4.5.1 Threshold For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.2 Procedure For Initiating Investigation -- 4.5.3 Authority Responsible For Initiating Investigation -- 4.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 5 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.1 General Considerations -- 5.2 Conduct of Investigation in Germany -- 5.2.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5.2.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.2.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.2.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of investigation -- 5.2.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3 Conduct of Investigation in Poland -- 5.3.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.3.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.3.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.3.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.3.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4 Conduct of Investigation in Italy -- 5.4.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.4.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.4.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.4.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.4.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5 Conduct of Investigation in the United States of America -- 5.5.1 The Relationship Between Prosecutor and Police -- 5.5.2 The Prosecutor's Supervisory Authority Over Investigation -- 5.5.3 The Investigative Authority of the Prosecutor -- 5.5.4 The Role of the Parties in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.5.5 The Judicial Involvement in the Conduct of Investigation -- 5.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 6 Powers of the Prosecutor Over the Preliminary Charging -- 6.1 General Considerations -- 6.2 Preliminary Charging in Germany -- 6.2.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.2.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.2.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3 Preliminary Charging in Poland -- 6.3.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.3.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6.3.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.3.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4 Preliminary Charging in Italy -- 6.4.1 General Considerations Concerning Charging Decisions -- 6.4.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.4.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5 Preliminary Charging in the United States of America -- 6.5.1 General Considerations Regarding Charging Decisions -- 6.5.2 Threshold For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.3 Procedure For Preliminary Charging -- 6.5.4 Authority Responsible For Preliminary Charging -- 6.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 7 Powers of the Prosecutor Over Imposition of Coercive Measures -- 7.1 General Considerations -- 7.2 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Germany -- 7.2.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.2.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.2.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.3 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Poland -- 7.3.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.3.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.3.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.4 Imposition of Coercive Measures in Italy -- 7.4.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.4.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.4.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.5 Imposition of Coercive Measures in the united States of America -- 7.5.1 General Considerations On Search and Arrest -- 7.5.2 Procedure For Imposing Coercive Measures -- 7.5.3 Authority to Impose Coercive Measures -- 7.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 8 Prosecutor's Powers to discontinue Investigation -- 8.1 General Considerations -- 8.2 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Germany -- 8.2.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.2.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8.2.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.3 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in Poland -- 8.3.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.3.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.3.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.4 Discontinuation of the Criminal Investigation in Italy -- 8.4.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.4.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.4.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.5 Discontinuation of Criminal Investigation in the United States of America -- 8.5.1 Threshold to Discontinue the Investigation -- 8.5.2 Procedure For Discontinuation of Investigation -- 8.5.3 Authority For Discontinuing Investigations -- 8.6 Summary -- References -- Chapter 9 Redefining Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.1 Criminal Investigation Remastered -- 9.2 Prospects For Shaping Prosecutorial Powers During Criminal Investigation -- 9.3 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This comparative analysis examines the scope of prosecutorial powers at different phases of criminal investigation in four countries: the United States, Italy, Poland, and Germany. In all of these countries, where the majority of cases are decided by forms of adjudication in which judges are often called to just confirm agreements achieved between parties, the criminal investigation has become a central point of the criminal process. It is important to make a conscience determination regarding who shall be in charge of this stage of the process. Prosecutors have gained tremendous powers to influence the outcome of the criminal cases, including powers once reserved only for judges. The book attempts to answer the question of whether in the system in which the role of the trial is diminishing, and where the significance of criminal investigation is constantly growing, should the powers of the prosecutor at the early stage of the process be enhanced. Using a problem-oriented approach that begins with the identification of a problem and then looks for potential common solutions, the book provides a parallel analysis of each country along five possible spheres of prosecutorial engagement: commencing criminal investigation, conducting criminal investigation, undertaking the initial charging decision, imposing coercive measures and discontinuing criminal investigation. Using the competing models of the adversarial versus inquisitorial approach as a framework, the focus is on the prosecutor as a crucial figure of criminal process and investigation to various degrees in different systems. The insights of this comparative treatment are relevant to students and academics in criminal justice, criminology, law, and public policy, as well as policymakers, government officials, and others interested in legal reform"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Public prosecutors</subfield><subfield code="z">United States.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0-367-86294-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Directions and developments in criminal justice and law ;</subfield><subfield code="v">4.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ebook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2024-07-17 06:27:32 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="d">00</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2021-04-03 23:05:43 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5345646470004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5345646470004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5345646470004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>