The Functional Transformation of Courts : Taiwan and Korea in Comparison

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Global East Asia ; v.3
:
TeilnehmendeR:
Year of Publication:2015
Edition:1st ed.
Language:German
Series:Global East Asia
Physical Description:1 online resource (302 p.)
Notes:Description based upon print version of record.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Intro
  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • Table of Contents
  • Jiunn-rong Yeh: 1 Introduction
  • Body
  • Courts in Asian new democracies: Taiwan and South Korea
  • Structure of the book
  • Overview of book chapters
  • Conclusion: similarity, difference and challenge
  • References
  • Part I: Courts in Constitutional and Administrative Adjudications
  • Jiunn-rong Yeh: 2 Court-ordered Apology: The Function of Courts in the Construction of Society, Culture and the Law
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Court-ordered apology cases in Taiwan and South Korea
  • 2.1 Taiwan's case
  • 2.2 Korean case
  • 2.3 Judgment and reasoning in comparison
  • 2.3.1 Freedom of speech vs. freedom of conscience
  • 2.3.2 Rights conflicts vs. state-imposed restriction
  • 2.3.3 Necessary remedy vs. improper measure
  • 3 Legal debates on court-ordered apology
  • 3.1 The subject of review
  • 3.2 Rights and restriction
  • 3.3 Necessary and proper
  • 4 Cultural perspective on court-ordered apology
  • 4.1 Apology in the West
  • 4.2 The culture of "face" in Asia
  • 4.2.1 Apology as guilt/right and as relational reputation
  • 4.2.2 The function of apology and its requirements
  • 5 The role of courts and judicial strategy
  • 5.1 A court of reconciliation: Taiwan model
  • 5.2 A court of modernization: Korea model
  • 6 Conclusion
  • References
  • Jong-ik Chon: 3 The Effect of Constitutional Adjudication on the Judicial Branch: The Relationship between the Constitutional Court and the Ordinary Court
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Background
  • 2.1 History of constitutional adjudication
  • 2.2 The Constitutional Court in the 1988 Constitution
  • 3 Impact of constitutional adjudication on the ordinary courts
  • 3.1 Constitutional issues in ordinary court decisions
  • 3.2 Scope of appeals to the Supreme Court
  • 4 Conflicts between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court
  • 4.1 Subject of conflicts.
  • 4.2 Rules Implementing the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act case
  • 4.3 Constitutional Review of the Supreme Court Decision case
  • 4.4 Supplementary Provision of a Repealed Act on the Regulation on Tax Reduction and Exemption Case
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • Wen-Chen Chang: 4 The Evolution of Administrative Adjudication in Taiwan: A Model of Judicial Cooperation
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Creation and evolution
  • 2.1 The establishment of administrative adjudication
  • 2.2 The comprehensive revision since the late 1990s
  • 3 Judges and appointment
  • 3.1 Qualifications of judges
  • 3.2 Appointments of judges
  • 3.3 The number of judges
  • 4 Jurisdiction and performance
  • 4.1 Jurisdictional conflict
  • 4.2 Standing to sue
  • 4.3 Performance
  • 5 Expansion: the model of judicial cooperation
  • 5.1 Expansion by administrative courts
  • 5.2 Expansion by the Constitutional Court
  • 6 Conclusion
  • References
  • Seong-Wook Heo: 5 The Judicial Review Criteria in Korean Administrative Litigation: The Proportionality Principle in Korean Administrative Law and Democratic Accountability
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The proportionality principle in Korean administrative adjudication
  • 2.1 Background
  • 2.2 The contents of the proportionality principle
  • 2.2.1 Principle of suitability (Grundsatz der Geeignetheit)
  • 2.2.2 Principle of necessity (Grundsatz der Erforderlichkeit)
  • 2.2.3 Principle of proportionality (Grundsatz der Angemessenheit)
  • 2.3 The effect of the violation of the principle of proportionality
  • 3 The example of judicial review of administrative action through the proportionality principle in Korea
  • 3.1 Supreme Court March 8, 1994 Decision [Case I]
  • 3.2 Supreme Court November 23, 2006 Decision [Case II]
  • 3.3 Supreme Court August 24, 2001 Decision [Case III].
  • 4 Is there any consistent and logical criterion for deciding whether a certain administrative measure is proportional?
  • 5 The proportionality principle and the Chevron deference principle
  • 6 The proportionality principle and democratic accountability
  • 7 Conclusion
  • References
  • Part II: Courts in Civil and Commercial Adjudications
  • Chung-jau Wu: 6 The Law-making Function of the Court and the Necessity for a Second Amendment for Taiwanese Law of Contracts: An Observation from Leading Cases
  • 1 Introduction: a unanimous orientation of the codification or amendment of civil law in East Asia
  • 2 Rethinking the necessity for a second amendment of the Taiwanese Law of Obligations
  • 2.1 An overall re-examination on the rules of limitations
  • 2.2 Reviewing the law of irregularities of performance
  • 2.2.1 A general outline
  • 2.2.2 Performance impossible: subjective or objective?
  • 2.2.3 Performance impossible or performance non-conforming?
  • 2.2.4 How the provisions of non-conforming performance and warranty are applied collaboratively
  • 3 Conclusion: analysis and development of the Taiwanese Law of Obligations
  • 3.1 The achievement of judge-law-making function by the court
  • 3.2 The constraints of judge-law-making and the necessity for an amendment
  • 3.3 A chance for the unification of East-Asian contract law
  • References
  • Jinsu Yune: 7 Judicial Activism and the Constitutional Reasoning of the Korean Supreme Court in the Field of Civil Law
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Actual lawmaking by the court
  • 2.1 The protection of transsexuals' human rights
  • 2.2 Termination of life-sustaining treatment
  • 3 Constitutional review of customary law
  • 3.1 The customary prescription for the inheritance restitution right
  • 3.2 The female membership of the Jongjung
  • 3.3 The host or hostess of the ancestor worship ritual.
  • 4 Horizontal effect of human rights in the private sphere
  • 4.1 The liability of an internet service provider for defamation
  • 4.2 Mandatory religious education in private schools
  • 4.3 The disclosure of private information about attorneys
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • Ching-Ping Shao: 8 Beyond Uncertainty: Lower Courts' Defiance in Insider Trading Cases
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Insider trading law and enforcement in Taiwan
  • 3 Insider trading cases in Taiwanese courts
  • 4 Beyond uncertainty: two examples of the lower courts' defiance
  • 4.1 Comparison of the insider trading law before and after 2010
  • 4.2 Controversy of "possession" versus "use"
  • 5 Exploring the lower courts' defiance
  • 6 Restoring the authority of the Supreme Court
  • 7 Concluding remarks
  • References
  • Hyeok-Joon Rho: 9 Enforcement against Wrongdoing Directors: The Role of the Courts in Korea
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Statutory arrangement: civil and criminal sanction
  • 2.1 Civil sanction: director's liability under the Korean Commercial Code and the Capital Market Act
  • 2.1.1 Causes of action
  • 2.1.2 Special procedures for civil enforcement: derivative action and class action
  • 2.2 Criminal sanction: director's liability under the Korean Criminal Code and special criminal statute
  • 3 Jurisprudence by the Korean civil courts
  • 3.1 Director's misconduct and business judgment
  • 3.2 The limitation on damages
  • 3.3 Facilitative interpretation of procedural requirement
  • 4 Jurisprudence by the Korean criminal courts
  • 4.1 Criminal courts' broad interpretations on some vague terms
  • 4.2 Business judgment rule in criminal cases?
  • 4.3 Criminal charge on LBO transaction
  • 5 More complex enforcement: directors in corporate groups
  • 5.1 Civil enforcement
  • 5.2 Criminal enforcement
  • 6 Towards balanced enforcement in Korea.
  • 6.1 The criminalization of corporate law and its limits
  • 6.2 The role of courts in corporate governance
  • References
  • Part III: Changing Courts with Civil and Criminal Procedural Reforms
  • Kuan-Ling Shen: 10 The Role of the Courts in Civil Disputes in Taiwan
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Courts and civil procedure
  • 2.1 From direct adoption of foreign systems to localized reform
  • 2.2 Important characteristics of Taiwan's civil procedural law
  • 2.3 From party autonomy to court coordination
  • 2.3.1 The purpose of the civil procedure
  • 2.3.2 Increasing importance of the court's responsibility to elucidate to avoid surprise verdicts
  • 2.4 From protection of individual interests to protection of group interests
  • 3 Court-connected mediation
  • 4 Conclusion
  • References
  • Kang-Jin Baik: 11 Civil Disputes in Korea and the New Role of the Court
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Features of the Korean civil procedure
  • 2.1 Brief history of the Korean civil procedure
  • 2.2 Guiding principles of civil procedure in Korea
  • 3 Unique features of Korean society and new challenges for the court
  • 4 Electronic litigation system as an access route for the court
  • 5 Court Mediation Center as a hub for dispute resolution
  • 6 A whole new model: active involvement of judges in the process
  • 6.1 Emergence of a new model
  • 6.2 Transition of oral proceeding
  • 6.3 Problem of active elucidation
  • 7 Observation
  • 8 Conclusion
  • References
  • Rong-Geng Li: 12 From an Inquisitorial to Adversarial System: The Recent Development in Criminal Justice of Taiwan
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The adversarial system and the inquisitorial system
  • 3 The court's duty to investigate before 2002
  • 4 The court's duty of investigation of crimes after 2002
  • 5 The examination of witness
  • 6 The order of trial proceedings
  • 7 Plea bargaining
  • 7.1 The practice before 2004.
  • 7.2 Applicable offenses.