Competing fundamentalisms and Egyptian women's family rights : : international law and the reform of Shari'a-derived legislation / / by Jasmine Moussa.

The debate surrounding women’s family rights under Sharī’a -derived law has long been held captive to the competing fundamentalisms of universalism and cultural relativism. These two conflicting perspectives fail to promote practical tools through which such laws can be reformed, without prejudice t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Brill's Arab and Islamic laws series
:
Year of Publication:2011
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:Brill's Arab and Islamic laws series.
Physical Description:1 online resource (320 p.)
Notes:Description based upon print version of record.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Preliminary Material / J. Moussa
  • Introduction / J. Moussa
  • 1. The Human Rights Of Women In A Specific Cultural Context / J. Moussa
  • 2. The Sources Of International Women’s Rights Law And International Enforcement Mechanisms / J. Moussa
  • 3. The Prohibition Of Discrimination Under CEDAW And The Role Of The CEDAW Committee / J. Moussa
  • 4. Shari’A-Based Reservations: The Law And Politics Of Invalidity / J. Moussa
  • 5. Shari’A Law And The Development Of Egypt’s Personal Status Legislation / J. Moussa
  • 6. Gender (In)equality And The Shari’a In Egypt’s Constitution: The Role Of The Supreme Constitutional Court / J. Moussa
  • 7. Marriage, Divorce And Inheritance: Unequal Power Structures And Women’s Equality Rights / J. Moussa
  • 8. The Positive Prospects For Personal Status Law Reform: Two Steps Forward / J. Moussa
  • 9. Domestic Enforcement Of Women’s Human Rights / J. Moussa
  • Conclusion / J. Moussa
  • Select Bibliography / J. Moussa
  • Index / J. Moussa.