Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures / / edited by Gregor Noll.

Today, a majority of asylum cases are arguably decided on the basis of evidentiary assessment rather than issues of material law. Although the EU-wide Common European Asylum System purports to harmonise domestic practices at a minimum level, it fails to offer remedies for this crucial issue, which p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library ; 16
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden; , Boston : : Brill | Nijhoff,, 2005.
Year of Publication:2005
Edition:1st ed.
Language:English
Series:The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library ; 16.
Physical Description:1 online resource (248 p.)
Notes:Description based upon print version of record.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04783nam a22006731i 4500
001 993583698004498
005 20240410130259.0
006 m o d
007 cr -n---------
008 210731s2005 ne ob 001 0 eng d
010 |z  2005050081 
020 |a 1-280-86702-7 
020 |a 9786610867028 
020 |a 1-4294-2718-3 
020 |a 90-474-0619-2 
020 |a 1-4337-0421-8 
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789047406198  |2 DOI 
035 |a (CKB)1000000000334952 
035 |a (EBL)280723 
035 |a (OCoLC)476024400 
035 |a (SSID)ssj0000229265 
035 |a (PQKBManifestationID)11190392 
035 |a (PQKBTitleCode)TC0000229265 
035 |a (PQKBWorkID)10167903 
035 |a (PQKB)11143013 
035 |a (MiAaPQ)EBC280723 
035 |a (Au-PeEL)EBL280723 
035 |a (CaPaEBR)ebr10171578 
035 |a (CaONFJC)MIL86702 
035 |a (OCoLC)191950106 
035 |a (nllekb)BRILL9789047406198 
035 |a (EXLCZ)991000000000334952 
040 |a NL-LeKB  |c NL-LeKB  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
050 4 |a K3268.3 
072 7 |a LAW  |x 051000  |2 bisacsh 
072 7 |a LBBR  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a POL  |x 035010  |2 bisacsh 
082 0 4 |a 342.08/3  |2 23 
245 0 0 |a Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures /  |c edited by Gregor Noll. 
250 |a 1st ed. 
264 1 |a Leiden;   |a Boston :  |b Brill | Nijhoff,  |c 2005. 
300 |a 1 online resource (248 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt 
337 |a computer  |b c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr 
490 1 |a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library ;  |v 16 
500 |a Description based upon print version of record. 
546 |a English 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS -- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: REMAPPING EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT IN ASYLUM PROCEDURES Gregor Noll -- A - DISCOURSES, PROCEDURES AND CONCEPTS -- CHAPTER 2 COMPETING PATTERNS FOR EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENTS Henrik Zahle -- CHAPTER 3 EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT AND NON-REFOULEMENT: INSIGHTS FROM CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Aleksandra Popovic -- B - LESSONS LEARNT ON THE BASIS OF DOMESTIC EXPERIENCESM -- CHAPTER 4 THE BORDERLINE BETWEEN QUESTIONS OF FACT AND QUESTIONS OF LAW Jens Vedsted-Hansen -- CHAPTER 5 STEREOTYPING AND ACCELERATION - GENDER, PROCEDURAL ACCELERATION AND MARGINALISED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE DUTCH ASYLUM SYSTEM Thomas Spijkerboer -- CHAPTER 6 ON BEING HEARD IN ASYLUM CASES - EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT THROUGH ASYLUM INTERVIEWS Nienke Doornbos -- CHAPTER 7 EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFICULTIES -- Jane Herlihy -- C - THE GUIDING POTENTIAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW -- CHAPTER 8 EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT UNDER THE REFUGEE CONVENTION: RISK, PAIN AND THE INTERSUBJECTIVITY OF FEAR Gregor Noll -- CHAPTER 9 EXCLUSION AND EVIDENTIARY ASSESSMENT Geoff Gilbert -- CHAPTER 10 CREDIBILITY IN CHANGING CONTEXTS: INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION Rosemary Byrne -- D - EPILOGUE -- CHAPTER 11 SALVATION BY THE GRACE OF STATE? EXPLAINING CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT IN THE ASYLUM PROCEDURE Gregor Noll -- INDEX; BIBLIOGRAPHY (SELECT) -- TABLE OF CASES -- AUTHORS' BIOGRAPHIES. 
520 |a Today, a majority of asylum cases are arguably decided on the basis of evidentiary assessment rather than issues of material law. Although the EU-wide Common European Asylum System purports to harmonise domestic practices at a minimum level, it fails to offer remedies for this crucial issue, which poses challenges for practitioners and academics alike. Without a coherent approach to evidentiary assessment, asylum law will remain fragmented and open to discretionary excess. Up to now, academic research has not addressed issues of proof and credibility in the asylum procedure to an extent reflecting its practical importance. This edited volume attempts to fill the void. Academic experts on the theory of evidence, international criminal law, human rights law, refugee law, sociology of law and psychology have contributed chapters exploring both empirical and normative dimensions of evidentiary assessment. Drawing on the results of a 12-month research project within the framework of the Refugee Research Programme and of three interdisciplinary expert conferences held at the Danish Centre for Human Rights, Copenhagen, the Institute for International Integration Studies, Dublin, and the Faculty of Law, Lund, this volume sets new parameters for an informed debate on evidence in asylum cases. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 0 |a Administrative courts. 
650 0 |a Asylum, Right of. 
650 0 |a Evidence (Law) 
776 |z 90-04-14065-4 
700 1 |a Noll, Gregor,  |e editor. 
830 0 |a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library ;  |v 16. 
906 |a BOOK 
ADM |b 2024-04-12 05:39:32 Europe/Vienna  |f system  |c marc21  |a 2012-02-26 02:26:57 Europe/Vienna  |g false 
AVE |i Brill  |P EBA Brill All  |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343693700004498&Force_direct=true  |Z 5343693700004498  |b Available  |8 5343693700004498