Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning /

Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning / / edited by Hans Kamp, Barbara Partee.

Does context and context-dependence belong to the research agenda of semantics - and, specifically, of formal semantics? Not so long ago many linguists and philosophers would probably have given a negative answer to the question. However, recent developments in formal semantics have indicated that a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface ; 11
TeilnehmendeR:
Kamp, Hans,
Partee, Barbara Hall,
Place / Publishing House:Bingley, England : : Emerald Publishing,, [2004]
©2004
Year of Publication:2004
Language:English
Series:Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface ; 11.
Physical Description:1 online resource.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • I. Papers
  • Empty-domain Effects for Presuppositional and Non-presuppositional Determiners, D. Abush, M. Rooth
  • From Discourse Macro-Structure to Micro-Structure and Back Again: Discourse Semantics and the Focus/Background Distinction, N. Asher
  • Fixing the Reference Situations: German Temporal Conjunctions, R. Bauerle
  • Accommodating Topics, D. Beaver
  • On Context and Identity, P. Dekker
  • Are Context Change Potentials Functions?, T. Fernando
  • A Minimal Theory of Adverbial Quantification, Kai von Fintel
  • Focus and the Boundaries of the Language System, E. Hajičova
  • Focus and/or Context: A Second Look at Second Occurrence Expressions, M. Krifka
  • Topic, Focus, and Some Aspects of the Semantics of Discourse, P. Kubon
  • Why not Kim Basinger? On the Art des Gegebenseins of a Contextually Given Set, A. Merin
  • Order-Independence and Underspecification, R. Muskens
  • Dynamic Semantics with Choice Functions, J. Peregrin, K. von Heusinger
  • Topics and the Conceptual Interface, T. Reinhart
  • Presuppositions of Existence and of Uniqueness, and Allegation, P. Sgall
  • Tertiumne Datur? Possessive Pronouns and the Bipartition of the Lexicon, T.E. Zimmermann
  • II. Comments
  • Comments on Tim Fernando: Mathematical Treatments of Contexts, N. Asher
  • Comments on Manfred Krifka: Can Pragmatic Accounts Explain Pseudo-Secondary Effects of Focus?, N. Asher
  • Comments on Asher and Krifka: Acoustic Correlates of Second Occurrence Focus: Toward and Experimental Investigation, C. Bartels
  • Comments on Beavers and von Fintels Theories of Presuppostition Accommodation, S. Berman
  • Comments on Zimmermann: Tertium Evitari Non Potest: On Ede Zimmermanns Bipartition of the Lexicon, M. Bierwisch
  • Cases, Adverbs, Situations and Events, P. Dekker
  • Comments on Beaver: Presupposition Accomodation and Quantifier Domains, Kai von Fintel
  • Comments on Reinhart: The Syntactic Roots of Discourse Cohesion, Kai von Fintel
  • Comments on von Fintel, E Hajičova
  • Remarks on Focus Sensitive Particles (to Krifkas and von Fintels Papers), E. Hajičova, Petr Sgall
  • Remarks on DRT and TFA, E. Hajičova, P. Sgall
  • Comments on Kaplans Demonstratives and Zimmermanns Tertiumne Datur? Possessive Pronouns and the Bipartition of the Lexicon, H. Kamp, A. Robetadeutcher
  • Comments on Dekker, J. Peregrin
  • Comments on Krifka, J. Peregrin
  • A Comment on Reinhard Muskens Paper: Order Independence and Underspecification, M. Pinkal
  • Comments on Krifkas Paper, M. Rooth
  • Topichood and the Stage/Individual Distinction, H. de Swart
  • Negation: Scope and Anaphora, H. de Swart
  • Topic, Focus, and Presupposition, H. de Swart
  • Remarks on the Epistemic Role of Discourse Referents, T.E. Zimmermann
  • III. Authors Replies
  • Minimal Replies to: Dekker, Hajičova & Sgall, Berman and De Swart, K. von Fintel
  • Replies to: Rooth, Bartels, Asher and Peregrin, M. Krifka
  • Replies to: Bierwisch, Kamp & Robetadeutscher and Muskens, T.E. Zimmermann.

Similar Items