The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : : the partial revival of the localisation theory? / / by Reza Eftekhar.

"The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory?" focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden, The Netherlands ;, Boston : : Brill,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Language:English
Series:Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20.
Physical Description:1 online resource.
Notes:Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Universiteit Leiden, 2019).
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id 993583305604498
ctrlnum (CKB)4100000012050662
(nllekb)BRILL9789004469600
(MiAaPQ)EBC6746177
(Au-PeEL)EBL6746177
(OCoLC)1257313325
(EXLCZ)994100000012050662
collection bib_alma
record_format marc
spelling Eftekhar, Reza, 1986- author.
The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? / by Reza Eftekhar.
Leiden, The Netherlands ; Boston : Brill, [2021]
©2021
1 online resource.
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource rdacarrier
Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20
"The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory?" focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic law's essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction issues, and in the light of the broader function of host state law and host state courts in contemporary investment treaty law, the author argues that the dormant "localisation" theory that was raised and defended by developing countries in the 1960s-1970s in the context of foreign investment contract disputes has now been partially revived in the area of investment treaty law. This is a significant milestone in the ongoing discussions on the reform of investment treaty dispute settlement regime"-- Provided by publisher.
Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Universiteit Leiden, 2019).
Introduction -- The role of domestic law in investment treaty arbitrations in general -- Application of domestic law to the legality requirement -- Application of domestic law to questions regarding the existence of rights over property constituting investment -- The localisation theory -- Partial revival of the localisation theory in the field of investment treaty arbitration : the current role of host state law and host state court -- Conclusion.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record.
Investments, Foreign (International law)
90-04-46959-1
Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20.
language English
format eBook
author Eftekhar, Reza, 1986-
spellingShingle Eftekhar, Reza, 1986-
The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
Nijhoff international investment law series ;
Introduction -- The role of domestic law in investment treaty arbitrations in general -- Application of domestic law to the legality requirement -- Application of domestic law to questions regarding the existence of rights over property constituting investment -- The localisation theory -- Partial revival of the localisation theory in the field of investment treaty arbitration : the current role of host state law and host state court -- Conclusion.
author_facet Eftekhar, Reza, 1986-
author_variant r e re
author_role VerfasserIn
author_sort Eftekhar, Reza, 1986-
title The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
title_sub the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
title_full The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? / by Reza Eftekhar.
title_fullStr The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? / by Reza Eftekhar.
title_full_unstemmed The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? / by Reza Eftekhar.
title_auth The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
title_new The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals :
title_sort the role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
series Nijhoff international investment law series ;
series2 Nijhoff international investment law series ;
publisher Brill,
publishDate 2021
physical 1 online resource.
contents Introduction -- The role of domestic law in investment treaty arbitrations in general -- Application of domestic law to the legality requirement -- Application of domestic law to questions regarding the existence of rights over property constituting investment -- The localisation theory -- Partial revival of the localisation theory in the field of investment treaty arbitration : the current role of host state law and host state court -- Conclusion.
isbn 90-04-46960-5
90-04-46959-1
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-subject K - General Law
callnumber-label K3830
callnumber-sort K 43830 E384 42021
illustrated Not Illustrated
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-tens 340 - Law
dewey-ones 346 - Private law
dewey-full 346.092
dewey-sort 3346.092
dewey-raw 346.092
dewey-search 346.092
oclc_num 1257313325
work_keys_str_mv AT eftekharreza theroleofthedomesticlawofthehoststateindeterminingthejurisdictionrationemateriaeofinvestmenttreatytribunalsthepartialrevivalofthelocalisationtheory
AT eftekharreza roleofthedomesticlawofthehoststateindeterminingthejurisdictionrationemateriaeofinvestmenttreatytribunalsthepartialrevivalofthelocalisationtheory
status_str n
ids_txt_mv (CKB)4100000012050662
(OCoLC)1257313325
(nllekb)BRILL9789004469600
(MiAaPQ)EBC6746177
(Au-PeEL)EBL6746177
(EXLCZ)994100000012050662
hierarchy_parent_title Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20
hierarchy_sequence Volume 20.
is_hierarchy_title The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals : the partial revival of the localisation theory? /
container_title Nijhoff international investment law series ; Volume 20
_version_ 1796652896064897025
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03040nam a2200457 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993583305604498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230629222736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d | </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr un uuuua</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220705s2021 ne ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">90-04-46960-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004469600</subfield><subfield code="2">DOI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000012050662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">(OCoLC)1257313325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(nllekb)BRILL9789004469600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC6746177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(Au-PeEL)EBL6746177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1257313325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000012050662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="e">pn</subfield><subfield code="c">MiAaPQ</subfield><subfield code="d">MiAaPQ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">K3830</subfield><subfield code="b">.E384 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW</subfield><subfield code="x">051000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LB</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.092</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eftekhar, Reza,</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The role of the domestic law of the host state in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals :</subfield><subfield code="b">the partial revival of the localisation theory? /</subfield><subfield code="c">by Reza Eftekhar.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden, The Netherlands ;</subfield><subfield code="a">Boston :</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill,</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nijhoff international investment law series ;</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory?" focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic law's essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction issues, and in the light of the broader function of host state law and host state courts in contemporary investment treaty law, the author argues that the dormant "localisation" theory that was raised and defended by developing countries in the 1960s-1970s in the context of foreign investment contract disputes has now been partially revived in the area of investment treaty law. This is a significant milestone in the ongoing discussions on the reform of investment treaty dispute settlement regime"--</subfield><subfield code="c">Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Universiteit Leiden, 2019).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- The role of domestic law in investment treaty arbitrations in general -- Application of domestic law to the legality requirement -- Application of domestic law to questions regarding the existence of rights over property constituting investment -- The localisation theory -- Partial revival of the localisation theory in the field of investment treaty arbitration : the current role of host state law and host state court -- Conclusion.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">90-04-46959-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nijhoff international investment law series ;</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 20.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-07-06 05:38:44 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2021-10-23 21:35:09 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Brill</subfield><subfield code="P">EBA Brill All</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&amp;portfolio_pid=5343577920004498&amp;Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5343577920004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5343577920004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection>