Myth and the limits of reason / / Phillip Stambovsky.

Traditionally understood as pre-critical, even pre-rational, mythical thought has in fact played a critical role in post-Enlightenment intellectual history. Modernists in philosophy and literature have used the depictive rationality of myth to disclose, in self-reflective ways, the limits of discurs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Value inquiry book series ; Volume 39
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Amsterdam ;, Atlanta, Georgia : : Rodopi,, [1996]
©1996
Year of Publication:1996
Language:English
Series:Value inquiry book series ; Volume 39.
Physical Description:1 online resource (146 pages)
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • ONE Mythopoeia and Rationality
  • TWO Mythopoeia and Meaning: Emergence of the Rationalist Standpoint and the Socratic Alternative
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The Mythos/Logos Split
  • 3 The Emergence of the Rationalist Tradition: Xenophanes
  • 4 Plato's Phaedrus and the Socratic Alternative to Polarizing Mythos and Logos
  • THREE The Legacy of Mythos/Logos Polarization in Contemporary Rationalist Myth Theory
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Malinowski: Dissociation of Intellectual and Functional Aspects of Myth
  • 3 Lévi-Strauss: Limits of Linguistic Logos as Applied to Myth
  • 4 Cassirer: Myth as a Stage on Thought's Way
  • 5 Ricoeur: Myth as an Ahistorical Starting Point for Modern Thought
  • 6 Blumenberg: Myth as an Accomplishment of Logos
  • FOUR Beyond the Mythos/Logos Split: Mythopoeia as Depictive Rationality
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Derivative Mythopoeia in Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling
  • 3 Transformative Mythopoeia in Unamuno's Life of Don Quixote
  • 4 Nonce Mythopoeia: An Instance in Henry James's The Golden Bowl
  • 5 Critical Mythopoeia in Margaret Atwood's Giving Birth
  • 6 Conclusion.