Buddhist apologetics in East Asia : : countering the neo-Confucian critiques in the Hufa lun and the Yusŏk chirŭi non / / by Uri Kaplan.
While the Neo-Confucian critique of Buddhism is fairly well-known, little attention has been given to the Buddhist reactions to this harangue. The fact is, however, that over a dozen apologetic essays have been written by Buddhists in China, Korea, and Japan in response to the Neo-Confucians. Buddhi...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Numen Book Series; volume163 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Leiden Boston : : BRILL,, 2019. |
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English Chinese |
Series: | Numen Book Series;
volume163. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (273 pages). |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Other title: | Front Matter -- Dedication -- Part 1: Introduction -- Part 2: Translations. |
---|---|
Summary: | While the Neo-Confucian critique of Buddhism is fairly well-known, little attention has been given to the Buddhist reactions to this harangue. The fact is, however, that over a dozen apologetic essays have been written by Buddhists in China, Korea, and Japan in response to the Neo-Confucians. Buddhist Apologetics in East Asia offers an introduction to this Buddhist literary genre. It centers on full translations of two dominant apologetic works—the Hufa lun (護法論), written by a Buddhist politician in twelfth-century China, and the Yusŏk chirŭi non (儒釋質疑論), authored by an anonymous monk in fifteenth-century Korea. Put together, these two texts demonstrate the wide variety of polemical strategies and the cross-national intertextuality of East Asian Buddhist apologetics. |
Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 900440788X |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | by Uri Kaplan. |