NATO rules of engagement : : on ROE, self-defence and the use of force during armed conflict / / Camilla Guldahl Cooper.

In NATO Rules of Engagement, Camilla Guldahl Cooper offers clarity on a topic prone to confusion and misunderstanding. NATO rules of engagement (ROE) are of considerable political, strategic and operational importance, yet many of its concepts lack clarity. The resulting ambiguity may be detrimental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:International humanitarian law series ; Volume 57
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden ;, Boston : : Brill Nijhoff,, [2020]
©2020
Year of Publication:2020
Language:English
Series:International humanitarian law series ; Volume 57.
Physical Description:1 online resource (498 pages)
Notes:Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Universitetet i Oslo, 2018).
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgements
  • List of Abbreviations
  • 1 Introduction
  •  1.1 Background and Purpose
  •  1.2 nato Rules of Engagement
  •  1.3 Scope
  •  1.4 Sources and Methodology
  •  1.5 The Structure of the Book
  • Part 1  / The Point of Departure: nato Rules of Engagement
  • 2 Rules of Engagement: Introduction, Development and Use
  •  2.1 Introduction
  •  2.2 Analysing roe : Definition, Scope and Form, and Legal Status
  •  2.3 The History of Mission-Specific Rules of Engagement
  •  2.4 roe Development
  •  2.5 roe as a Tool for Command and Control
  •  2.6 Conclusions
  • 3 ‘Use of force’ Categories in nato roe Doctrine
  •  3.1 Introduction
  •  3.2 The Use of Force in Self-Defence
  •  3.3 The Use of Force in Response to an Attack or Imminent Attack by Opposing Forces
  •  3.4 The Use of Force to Accomplish Designated Tasks
  •  3.5 Attack in Response to Hostile Act and Hostile Intent as Defined by Nato
  •  3.6 Attack on Forces ‘declared hostile’
  • Part 2 / “Otherwise Lawful Use of Force”: the Law Regulating the Use of Force during Armed Conflict
  • 4 Introduction: the Search for a Legal Basis
  •  4.1 The Lotus Principle, Human Rights, and the Relevance of the Relationship between the / jus ad bellum and / jus in bello
  •  4.2 The Right to Life and Prohibition on Arbitrary Deprivation of Life
  •  4.3 The Relationship between the / jus ad bellum and the / jus in bello : Related in Fact, but Not in Law
  •  4.4 When Does What Apply? On / lex specialis
  •  4.5 Conclusion: Two Main Legal Bases for the Use of Force
  • 5 The Law of Armed Conflict
  •  5.1 Introduction
  •  5.2 Who Is a Lawful Target
  •  5.3 What Does It Entail to Be a Lawful Target
  •  5.4 Identification of Lawful Targets: Precautions in Attack and the Issue of Doubt
  •  5.5 Carrying Out Attacks
  • 6 Self-Defence
  •  6.1 Introduction
  •  6.2 State Self-Defence
  •  6.3 Personal Self-Defence
  •  6.4 Conclusion Part 3 / Operational ‘use of force’ Categories and their Corresponding Legal Bases: What May Legally Be Authorised?
  • 7 Introduction to Part 3
  • 8 The Use of Force in Self-Defence during Armed Conflict: a Legal Analysis of the Various Concepts of Self-Defence
  •  8.1 Overview
  •  8.2 The Use of Force in Personal Self-Defence by Military Forces during Armed Conflict
  •  8.3 Operational Concepts of Self-Defence
  •  8.4 Conclusions on the Relevance of Self-Defence as a Legal Basis for Use of Force during Armed Conflict Operations
  • 9 The Use of Force by nato Forces in Response to Attacks or Imminent Attacks by Opposing Forces
  • 10 When May Force be Used to Accomplish Designated Tasks?
  • 11 nato Hostile Intent and Hostile Act roe: Applicable Law and Its Consequences
  •  11.1 ‘hostile act’ and ‘hostile intent’ as Operationalisation of dph
  •  11.2 nato Hostile Act and Hostile Intent roe and Customary Law
  •  11.3 Conclusions on the Relationship between the nato Hostile Act and Hostile Intent roe and dph
  •  11.4 ‘Attack’
  • 12 The Use of Force in an Attack on Forces ‘declared hostile’ and Applicable Law
  •  12.1 Forces ‘declared hostile’
  •  12.2 ‘attack’ and The Role of Targeting Procedures
  • Part 4 / Conclusions and Proposals
  • 13 Conclusions and Proposals
  •  13.1 nato roe and the Legal Basis for the Use of Force
  •  13.2 The Need for a Holistic and Uniform Approach to roe
  •  13.3 The Relationship between Self-Defence, loac and roe
  • Bibliography
  • Index.