Methods of resolving conflicts between treaties / / Seyed-Ali Sadat-Akhavi.
Despite the theoretical and practical importance of the question of conflict between treaties, little has been written on the subject. This monograph fills this gap by providing a detailed analysis of the main issues. The book is divided into three parts. The first deals with the definition of confl...
Saved in:
VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Leiden ;, Boston : : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,, [2003] |
Year of Publication: | 2003 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies ;
3. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Dedication
- Table of Contents
- INTRODUCTION
- PART ONE PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS
- CHAPTER ONE THE CONCEPT OF 'CONFLICT'
- I. Definition of Conflict
- II. Causes of Conflict
- 1. The Same Act Is Subject to Different Types of Norms
- 2. One Norm Requires an Act, While the Other Norm Requires or Permits a 'Contrary' Act
- 3. One Norm Prohibits a 'Necessary Precondition' of Another Norm
- 4. One Norm Prohibits a 'Necessary Consequence' of Another Norm
- III. Types of Conflict
- 1. 'Partial' and 'Total' Conflicts
- 2. 'Bipartite' and 'Multipartite' Conflicts
- 3. 'Supervening' and 'Constant' Conflicts
- IV. Schematic Representation of Conflicting Norms
- 1. Constituent Elements of the Diagrams
- 2. Diagrams Representing Conflicting Norms
- A. Identical subjects
- B. One subject is more general
- C. Overlapping Subjects
- D. Disjoint Subjects
- V. Summary
- CHAPTER TWO ASCERTAINING THE EXISTENCE OF CONFLICT: REAL AND FALSE CONFLICTS
- I. Interpretation of Norms
- 1. Interpretation as a Means of Ascertaining the Existence of a Conflict
- 2. Some Problems of the Interpretation of Norms
- A. Norms Having an Implied' Meaning
- B. The Meaning of the Term 'Right'
- II. Reconciliation of Norms
- 1. The Concept of 'Reconciliation'
- 2. Some Instances of Reconcilable Norms
- A. Concurrent Permissive Norms Can Never Conflict
- B. Two Norms May Have 'Canceling' Effect without Being Conflicting
- C. One Norm May Relate to the 'Manner' in Which the Other Norm Must Be Performed
- III. Summary
- PART TWO RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR RESOLVING CONFLICTS
- CHAPTER THREE CONVENTIONAL LAW
- I. The System of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
- 1. One Treaty Affects the 'Existence' of the Other Treaty
- A. Termination of the Earlier Treaty.
- B. One Treaty Invalidates the Other Treaty
- 2. Both Treaties Are in Force
- A. Amendment of Treaties
- B. Modification of Treaties
- C. Successive Treaties Relating to the Same Subject-Matter
- (i) The Pre-Eminence of the Charter of the United Nations
- (ii) Conflict-Resolving Clauses
- (iii) Rules for Resolving Conflicts
- (a) The Later Treaty Includes All the Parties to the Earlier Treaty
- (b) The Later Treaty Does Not Include All the Parties to the Earlier Treaty
- (c) The Question of the Validity of the Later Treaty
- (iv) The Critiques of the Vienna Convention
- (a) It Does Not Address the Question of Conflicting Obligations towards Different States
- (b) Problem of Determining the 'Later' Treaty
- (c) It Does Not Take Account of the Position of Regional Treaties
- (d) It Does Not Take Account of Treaties Containing Obligations erga omnes
- (e) The Ambiguity of the Term Treaty' in the Context of Article 30
- II. Specific Treaty Clauses Aiming at Resolving Conflicts
- 1. Definition of Conflict-Resolving Clauses
- 2. Types of Conflict-Resolving Clauses
- A. Clauses Giving Priority to the Treaty in Which They Are Incorporated
- (i) Priority over Existing Treaties
- (ii) Priority over Future Treaties
- (iii) Priority over Both Existing and Future Treaties
- B. Clauses Giving Priority to Other Treaties
- (i) Priority of Existing Treaties
- (ii) Priority of Future Treaties
- (iii) Priority of Both Existing and Future Treaties
- 3. The Problem of Concurrence between Conflict-Resolving Clauses
- CHAPTER FOUR CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW
- I. State Practice as Reflected in Decisions of National Courts and Governmental Documents
- 1. Priority of the Later Treaty over the Earlier One
- 2. Priority of the Special Treaty over the General One
- 3. The Hierarchy between Norms.
- 4. Priority of the 'Principal' Treaty over the Treaty 'Implementing' It
- 5. Denunciation of Existing Treaties as Means of Avoiding Conflict
- 6. Priority of the 'More Favorable Provision' in the Field of the Protection of Human Rights
- 7. The Principle of 'Legislative Intent'
- 8. The Principle of 'Maximum Effectiveness'
- II. Treaty Practice of States
- 1. Conflict between Universal Treaties
- A. Universal Treaties Having the Same Scope
- (i) Priority of the Later Treaty
- (ii) Priority of the Earlier Treaty
- B. The Scope of One Treaty Is Special
- (i) The Special Treaty Is Later in Time
- (ii) The General Treaty Is Later in Time
- C. Universal Treaties Which Are Partially Overlapping in Scope
- (i) Priority of Earlier Treaties
- (ii) Priority of the Later Treaty
- 2. Conflict between Universal and Closed Treaties
- A. A Universal Treaty Follows a Closed Treaty
- (i) Priority of Earlier Closed Treaties
- (ii) Priority of the Universal Treaty
- B. Closed Treaties Which Are Later in Time: The Problem of inter se Agreements
- C. Priority of the 'More Favorable' Treaty
- (i) Protection of Human Rights
- (ii) Protection of the Environment
- (iii) Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
- (iv) Protection of Cultural Property
- D. Priority of the 'More Effective' Treaty
- (i) Treaties on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
- (ii) Treaties on Dispute Settlement
- (iii) Treaties on Judicial Cooperation
- 3. Conflict between Closed Treaties
- A. Conflict between Regional Treaties
- (i) Regional Treaties Having the Same Scope
- (ii) The Scope of One Treaty Is Special
- (iii) Regional Treaties Whose Scopes Partially Overlap
- B. Conflict between Regional and Bilateral /Sub-Regional Treaties
- (i) The Regional Treaty Is Later in Time.
- (ii) Subsequent Bilateral / Sub-Regional Treaties: The Problem of inter se Agreements
- (iii) Priority of the 'More Effective' Treaty
- 4. Concluding Remarks Concerning Treaty Practice of States
- CHAPTER FIVE OTHER SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
- I. General Principles of Law
- II. Decisions of International Tribunals
- 1. The Oscar Chinn Case
- 2. European Commission of the Danube Case
- 3. The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions Case
- 4. The Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria Case
- PART THREE THE PROCESS OF RESOLVING CONFLICTS
- CHAPTER SIX DIFFERENT STAGES OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
- I. Ascertaining the Existence of a Conflict
- II. Searching for Applicable Conventional Rules
- III. Ascertaining the Intention of the Parties Not Specified in the Treaty
- 1. Intention Expressed in the Course of travaux préparatoires
- 2. Intention Expressed after the Adoption of the Treaty
- IV. Resolving Conflicts in the Absence of Any Indications on the Intention of the Parties
- V. Conclusions
- CHAPTER SEVEN SPECIAL RULES ADVANCED FOR RESOLVING CONFLICTS BETWEEN CERTAIN TYPES OF TREATIES
- I. The Principle of the 'More Favorable' Provision in the Field of Human Rights
- 1. The Scope of the Principle
- 2. Exceptions to the Principle
- A. Discrimination
- B. Interests of the Society
- 3. The Effect of an Express Provision Limiting or Not Recognizing a Specific Right Guaranteed under a Prior Instrument
- 4. The Impact of the Multiplicity of Control Organs
- 5. Implications of the Principle for States
- II. The Principle of Cumulative Application of Instruments on Dispute Settlement
- 1. Concurrent Instruments Relating to the Jurisdiction of the Same Body
- 2. Concurrent Instruments Relating to the Jurisdiction of Different Bodies.
- A. The Existence of a Clause Regulating the Relationship between the Procedure Established by One Instrument and Other Procedures
- B. The Absence of a Treaty Clause Regulating the Relationship between Concurrent Procedures for Dispute Settlement
- III. The Principle of 'Maximum Effectiveness' in the Field of Private Law
- IV. The Principle of the Priority of Treaties Relating to 'Special Matters'
- CONCLUSIONS
- BIBLIOGRAPHY.