Capital, Market and the State : : reconciling free movement of capital with public Interest objectives / / Ilektra Antonaki.

This book explores how the EU free movement of capital provisions can be interpreted in order to allow certain forms of State participation in the market for the purposes of protecting public interest objectives in the context of privatisations and golden shares. Drawing from the international contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law ; 20
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden;, Boston : : Brill | Nijhoff,, 2022.
Year of Publication:2022
Language:English
French
Series:Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law ; 20.
Physical Description:1 online resource.
Notes:Based on author's thesis (doctoral - Universiteit Leiden, 2019) issued under title: Privatisations and golden shares : bridging the gap between the State and the market in the area of free movement of capital in the EU.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • i Bridging the Gap between the State and the Market in the Context of Capital Liberalisation
  • ii Academic and Societal Relevance
  • iii Structure of the Book
  • 1   Capital Liberalisation at the International and the European Level
  • i Capital Liberalisation at the International Level
  • A  The Theoretical Controversy about Capital Liberalisation
  • B  The International Legal Framework Governing Capital Liberalisation
  • ii Capital Liberalisation at the European Level
  • A  A Historical Overview
  • 1 Treaty of Rome: The Early Tentative Steps
  • 2 The Council Directives
  • 3 The Maastricht Treaty
  • B  The Current Legal Framework
  • 1 The Scope of Article 63 tfeu
  • a) Territorial Scope
  • b) Material Scope
  • i) Difference between Capital Movements and Payments
  • ii) Definition of Capital Movements
  • c) Relationship with the Other Freedoms
  • 2 Direct Effect of Article 63 tfeu
  • 3 Restrictions
  • 4 Derogations
  • a) Treaty-based Derogations
  • i) Article 65 tfeu
  • ii) Derogations Applicable only to Capital Movements to/from Third Countries
  • b) Overriding Reasons in the Public Interest
  • 5 Proportionality
  • 2   Free Movement of Capital and Privatisations
  • i The Theoretical Underpinnings of Privatisation
  • A  Definition of Privatisation
  • B  The Theoretical Controversy about Privatisation
  • ii Privatisation and EU law
  • A  The Politico-economic Context
  • B  The Legal Framework: The Principle of Neutrality under Article 345 tfeu
  • 1 The 'Maximalist Shield' Interpretation
  • 2 The 'Reductionist Shield' Interpretation
  • 3 The 'Sword' Interpretation
  • 4 Assessment of the Three Interpretations
  • 3   Free Movement of Capital and Golden Shares
  • i Understanding the Theoretical Controversy Surrounding Golden Shares
  • A  Definition of Golden Shares
  • B  Golden Shares as Control Enhancing Mechanisms
  • C  The Principle of Proportionality between Ownership and Control
  • D  Varieties of Capitalism: Liberal Market Economies v Coordinated Market Economies
  • E  Corporate Governance and EU Law
  • F  The Takeover Directive and the Golden Shares Case Law
  • ii Legal Issues Arising from the Golden Shares Case Law
  • A  The Horizontal Application of Article 63 tfeu in the Golden Shares Case Law
  • 1 The Concept of 'Horizontality' in Constitutional Law
  • 2 Horizontal Effect in EU Law
  • a) Defrenne: Horizontal Effect of Equal Pay
  • b) Walrave & Koch and Bosman: Horizontal Effect of Free Movement of Workers - Federation Exercising Regulatory Powers
  • c) Angonese: Horizontal Effect of Free Movement of Workers - Discriminatory Private Conduct
  • d) Viking and Laval: Horizontal Effect of Freedom of Establishment and Services - Trade Unions
  • e) Dansk Supermarked, Van de Haar and Fra.bo: Horizontal Effect of Free Movement of Goods
  • f) ams and Egenberger: Horizontal Effect of the Charter
  • 3 Horizontal Effect of Article 63 tfeu
  • a) The Case Law Regarding the Horizontal Effect of Article 63 tfeu
  • b) Scholarly Opinions on the Horizontal Effect of Article 63 tfeu
  • c) Granting horizontal effect to Article 63 tfeu
  • B  Public Interest Objectives as Justification Grounds in the Golden Shares Case Law
  • 1 The Objective of Safeguarding Energy Supplies in the Event of a Crisis as Covered by Public Security under Article 65 (1) (b) tfeu
  • 2 The Objective of Ensuring Availability of the Telecommunications Network in the Event of a Crisis as Covered by Public Security under Article 65 (1) (b) tfeu
  • 3 The Objective of Guaranteeing a Service of General Interest as an Overriding Reason in the Public Interest
  • 4 Article 106 (2) tfeu
  • 5 Protection of Workers and of Minority Shareholders
  • 6 Economic Rule
  • C  Proportionality in the Golden Shares Case Law
  • D  The Definition of 'Capital Restrictions' in the Golden Shares Case Law
  • 1 The Concept of 'Restrictions' in the Free Movement of Goods
  • a) The Pre-Keck Case Law on meeqr s
  • b) The Keck Ruling and the Introduction of the Concept of 'Selling Arrangements'
  • c) The Post-Keck 'Market Access' Test
  • 2 The Application of Keck in the Other Freedoms (Workers, Services and Establishment)
  • 3 'Selling Arrangements' in the Golden Shares Case Law
  • 4 In Search of a Refined Test for 'Capital Restrictions'
  • Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Index.