Rethinking East Asian languages, vernaculars, and literacies, 1000-1919 / / edited by Benjamin A. Elman.

• Superior document: Sinica Leidensia, Volume 115
• TeilnehmendeR: Elman, Benjamin A., 1946-
• Place / Publishing House: Leiden, Netherlands : : Brill,, 2014.; ©2014
• Year of Publication: 2014
• Edition: 1st ed.
• Language: English
• Series: Sinica Leidensia ; Volume 115.
• Physical Description: 1 online resource (334 p.)
• Notes: Includes index.
• Other title: Preliminary Material --; 1 Introduction: Languages in East and South Asia, 1000–1919 /; 2 The Vernacularization of Buddhist Texts: From the Tangut Empire to Japan /; 3 The Sounds of Our Country: Interpreters, Linguistic Knowledge, and the Politics of Language in Early Chosŏn Korea /; 4 Rebooting the Vernacular in Seventeenth-Century Vietnam /; 5 Mediating the Literary Classics: Commentary and Translation in Premodern Japan /; 6 The Languages of Medical Knowledge in Tokugawa Japan /; 7 The Manchu Script and Information Management: Some Aspects of Qing China’s Great Encounter with Alphabetic Literacy /; 8 Unintended Consequences of Classical Literacies for the Early Modern Chinese Civil Examinations /; 9 Competing “Languages”: “Sound” in the Orthographic Reforms of Early Meiji Japan /; 10 Writing and Speech: Rethinking the Issue of Vernaculars in Early Modern China /; Index /
• Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
• ISBN: 900427927X
• ISSN: 0169-9563
• Hierarchical level: Monograph
• Statement of Responsibility: edited by Benjamin A. Elman.

The authors consider new views of the classical versus vernacular dichotomy that are especially central to the new historiography of China and East Asian languages. Based on recent debates initiated by Sheldon Pollock’s findings for South Asia, we examine alternative frameworks for understanding East Asian languages between 1000 and 1919. Using new sources, making new connections, and re-examining old assumptions, we have asked whether and why East and SE Asian languages (e.g., Chinese, Manchu, Mongolian, Jurchen, Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese) should be analysed in light of a Eurocentric dichotomy of Latin versus vernaculars. This discussion has encouraged us to explore whether European modernity is an appropriate standard at all for East Asia. Individually and collectively, we have sought to establish linkages between societies without making a priori assumptions about the countries’ internal structures or the genealogy of their connections. Contributors include: Benjamin Elman; Peter Kornicki; John Phan; Wei Shang; Haruo Shirane; Mårten Söderblom Saarela; Daniel Trambaiolo; Atsuko Ueda; Sixiang Wang.