The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case.
In 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed any...
Saved in:
VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | [S.l.] : : Brill Academic Pub,, 2016. |
Year of Publication: | 2016 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Brill Research Perspectives.
|
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (vi, 91 pages) :; illustrations |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993582530204498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)3710000001009196 (MiAaPQ)EBC5597592 (OCoLC)962553010 (nllekb)BRILL9789004339453 (EXLCZ)993710000001009196 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Serdy, Andrew, author. The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. [S.l.] : Brill Academic Pub, 2016. 1 online resource (vi, 91 pages) : illustrations text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Brill research perspectives Includes bibliographical references. In 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed anyway because of international courts’ reluctance to consider scientific matters, the dispute's underlying cause being the parties' scientific disagreements regarding both the tuna stock itself and the nature and risks of the experiment. In 2014, however, the ICJ decided in Australia's favour the case against Japan's scientific whaling, based on flaws in the design of that experiment. Reviewing the tuna experiment's evolving design, the propositions it was to (dis)prove and the use Japan intended for that proof, Andrew Serdy suggests that similar factors were at play in both disputes and that a similar outcome of the tuna case, though not inevitable, would have been amply justified. Law of the sea. Marine resources Japan. Marine resources Australia. Australia. Japan. 90-04-33944-2 Serdy, Andrew. Brill Research Perspectives. |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author |
Serdy, Andrew, |
spellingShingle |
Serdy, Andrew, The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. Brill research perspectives |
author_facet |
Serdy, Andrew, |
author_variant |
a s as |
author_role |
VerfasserIn |
author_sort |
Serdy, Andrew, |
title |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_sub |
Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_full |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_fullStr |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_auth |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
title_new |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : |
title_sort |
the other australia / japan living marine resources dispute : inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case. |
series |
Brill research perspectives |
series2 |
Brill research perspectives |
publisher |
Brill Academic Pub, |
publishDate |
2016 |
physical |
1 online resource (vi, 91 pages) : illustrations |
isbn |
90-04-33945-0 90-04-33944-2 |
callnumber-first |
K - Law |
callnumber-label |
KZA1145 |
callnumber-sort |
KZA 41145 O84 42016 |
geographic |
Australia. Japan. |
geographic_facet |
Japan. Australia. |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
dewey-ones |
343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
dewey-full |
343.07692 |
dewey-sort |
3343.07692 |
dewey-raw |
343.07692 |
dewey-search |
343.07692 |
oclc_num |
962553010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT serdyandrew theotheraustraliajapanlivingmarineresourcesdisputeinferencesonthemeritsofthesouthernbluefintunaarbitrationinlightofthewhalingcase AT serdyandrew otheraustraliajapanlivingmarineresourcesdisputeinferencesonthemeritsofthesouthernbluefintunaarbitrationinlightofthewhalingcase |
status_str |
c |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)3710000001009196 (MiAaPQ)EBC5597592 (OCoLC)962553010 (nllekb)BRILL9789004339453 (EXLCZ)993710000001009196 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute : Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case. |
_version_ |
1796652834836447232 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02493cam a2200457Ii 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993582530204498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230808201254.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161114s2016 xx o 000 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">90-04-33945-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004339453</subfield><subfield code="2">DOI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)3710000001009196</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5597592</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)962553010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(nllekb)BRILL9789004339453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)993710000001009196</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="c">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">a-ja---</subfield><subfield code="a">e-au---</subfield><subfield code="a">u-nz---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KZA1145</subfield><subfield code="b">.O84 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LBBK</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW066000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.07692</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serdy, Andrew,</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute :</subfield><subfield code="b">Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[S.l.] :</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill Academic Pub,</subfield><subfield code="c">2016.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (vi, 91 pages) :</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brill research perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed anyway because of international courts’ reluctance to consider scientific matters, the dispute's underlying cause being the parties' scientific disagreements regarding both the tuna stock itself and the nature and risks of the experiment. In 2014, however, the ICJ decided in Australia's favour the case against Japan's scientific whaling, based on flaws in the design of that experiment. Reviewing the tuna experiment's evolving design, the propositions it was to (dis)prove and the use Japan intended for that proof, Andrew Serdy suggests that similar factors were at play in both disputes and that a similar outcome of the tuna case, though not inevitable, would have been amply justified.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law of the sea.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marine resources</subfield><subfield code="z">Japan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Marine resources</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Australia.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Japan.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">90-04-33944-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="720" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serdy, Andrew.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Brill Research Perspectives.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-08-10 04:44:21 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2017-01-15 09:15:08 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Brill</subfield><subfield code="P">EBA Brill All</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343336010004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5343336010004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5343336010004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |