The Rome statute as evidence of customary international law / / Yudan Tan.

In The Rome Statute as Evidence of Customary International Law , Yudan Tan offers a detailed analysis of topical issues concerning the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as evidence of customary international law. The 1998 Rome Statute has generated a great deal of scholarly interest....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:International Criminal Law Series ; 16
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden, Netherlands ;, Boston, Massachusetts : : Brill,, [2021]
©2021
Year of Publication:2021
Language:English
Series:International Criminal Law Series ; 16.
Physical Description:1 online resource.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Table of Legislation
  • Table of Cases
  • United Nations Documents
  • 1 Introduction
  • 1.1 The Role of Customary International Law in the International Criminal Court
  • 1.2 Aim, Questions and Scope of This Book
  • 1.3 Method and Terms of This Book
  • 1.4 Structure of This Book
  • 1.5 Merits and Limits of This Book
  • 2 Methodological Framework of This Book
  • 2.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 2.2 Interpreting Provisions of the Rome Statute
  • 2.3 Method: The Two-Element Approach to Identifying Customary Rules
  • 2.4 Terms: Treaty Was or Is of a 'Declaratory' Nature of Custom
  • 2.5 Preconditions for This Study
  • 2.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 3 War Crimes in Non-international Armed Conflict
  •  Article 8 of the Rome Statute and Custom
  • 3.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 3.2 Provisions on War Crimes in Non-international Armed Conflict in the Rome Statute
  • 3.3 War Crimes in Armed Conflict
  • 3.4 War Crimes in Non-international Armed Conflict: Were Articles 8(2)(c) and (e) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 3.5 Further Recognition of War Crimes in Non-international Armed Conflict: Are Articles 8(2)(c) and (e) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 3.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 4 Crimes against Humanity
  •  Article 7 of the Rome Statute and Custom
  • 4.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 4.2 Provisions on Crimes against Humanity in the Rome Statute
  • 4.3 Crimes against Humanity as International Crimes under Customary Law
  • 4.4 No Nexus with an Armed Conflict: Was and Is Article 7(1) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 4.5 The Policy Element: Was and Is Article 7(2)(a) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 4.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 5 The Crime of Aggression
  •  Articles 8bis and 25(3bis) of the Rome Statute and Custom
  • 5.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 5.2 The Crime of Aggression in International Law
  • 5.3 Provisions on the Crime of Aggression in the Rome Statute
  • 5.4 The Leadership Element for the Crime of Aggression: Were Articles 8 bis and 25(3 bis ) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 5.5 The Leadership Element for the Crime of Aggression: Are Articles 8 bis and 25(3 bis ) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 5.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 6 Indirect Co-perpetration
  •  Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute and Custom
  • 6.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 6.2 The Attribution of Liability to Individuals at the Leadership Level
  • 6.3 Is Indirect Co-perpetration Encompassed in Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute?
  • 6.4 Non-acceptance of Indirect Co-Perpetration in Post-World War ii Trials
  • 6.5 Indirect Co-perpetration: Is Article 25(3)(a) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 6.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 7 An Exception to Personal Immunity for International Crimes
  •  Article 27(2) of the Rome Statute and Custom
  • 7.1 Introductory Remarks
  • 7.2 Immunity under International Law
  • 7.3 Personal Immunity: Article 27(2) of the Rome Statute
  • 7.4 Non-availability of Personal Immunity for International Crimes: Was Article 27(2) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 7.5 Non-availability of Personal Immunity for Committing International Crimes: Is Article 27(2) Declaratory of Custom?
  • 7.6 Concluding Remarks
  • 8 Conclusions
  • 8.1 Synthesis
  • 8.2 Discussions and Concluding Remarks
  • Bibliography
  • Index.