Spheres of philosophical inquiry and the historiography of medieval philosophy / / by John Inglis.
Recent writers in the historiography of philosophy have placed into question the paradigms that structure our historical writing. This volume continues this discussion with particular reference to medieval philosophy. Inglis shows that the modern historiography of medieval philosophy had its origins...
Saved in:
Superior document: | Brill's studies in intellectual history, volume 81 |
---|---|
VerfasserIn: | |
Place / Publishing House: | Leiden ;, Boston : : Brill,, 1998. |
Year of Publication: | 1998 |
Language: | English |
Series: | Brill's studies in intellectual history ;
v. 81. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (333 pages) |
Notes: | Some chapters have appeared in journals and earlier versions of some chapters were read at several conferences 1992-1993. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Recent writers in the historiography of philosophy have placed into question the paradigms that structure our historical writing. This volume continues this discussion with particular reference to medieval philosophy. Inglis shows that the modern historiography of medieval philosophy had its origins in certain nineteenth-century German reactions to Kantian idealism. He uncovers the philosophical, political, and theological origins of how we have come to interpret medieval philosophy according to the standard spheres of philosophy. By keeping such historiography in mind and paying attention to the context in which the medieval actually wrote, Inglis raises serious questions concerning the accuracy of the dominant model and proposes an historically sensitive alternative. The genealogy will interest medievalists and intellectual historians, the alternative model will interest historians of medieval philosophy, and theology. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
ISBN: | 9004247351 |
ISSN: | 0920-8607 ; |
Hierarchical level: | Monograph |
Statement of Responsibility: | by John Inglis. |