Copernicus in the cultural debates of the Renaissance : : reception, legacy, transformation / / by Pietro Daniel Omodeo.

In Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance , Pietro Daniel Omodeo presents a general overview of the reception of Copernicus’s astronomical proposal from the years immediately preceding the publication of De revolutionibus (1543) to the Roman prohibition of heliocentric hypotheses in 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Superior document:History of Science and Medicine Library. Medieval and Early Modern Science, Volume 45
VerfasserIn:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden, Netherlands : : Brill,, 2014.
©2014
Year of Publication:2014
Language:English
Series:History of science and medicine library. Medieval and early modern science ; Volume 45.
History of science and medicine library. Medieval and early modern science ; Volume 23.
Physical Description:1 online resource (447 p.)
Notes:Description based upon print version of record.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance , Pietro Daniel Omodeo presents a general overview of the reception of Copernicus’s astronomical proposal from the years immediately preceding the publication of De revolutionibus (1543) to the Roman prohibition of heliocentric hypotheses in 1616. Relying on a detailed investigation of early modern sources, the author systematically examines a series of issues ranging from computation to epistemology, natural philosophy, theology and ethics. In addition to offering a pluralistic and interdisciplinary perspective on post-Copernican astronomy, the study goes beyond purely cosmological and geometrical issues and engages in a wide-ranging discussion of how Copernicus’s legacy interacted with European culture and how his image and theories evolved as a result.     
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
ISBN:9004254501
ISSN:1567-8393 ;
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: by Pietro Daniel Omodeo.