Judicial dialogue on human rights : : the practice of international criminal tribunals / / edited by Paolo Lobba, Triestino Mariniello.

Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights offers a critical legal perspective on the manner in which international criminal tribunals select, (re-)interpret and apply the principles and standards formulated by the European Court of Human Rights. A part of the book is devoted to testing the assumption that t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
TeilnehmendeR:
Place / Publishing House:Leiden ;, Boston : : Brill,, 2017.
Year of Publication:2017
Language:English
Series:International Studies in Human Rights 120.
Physical Description:1 online resource (321 pages) :; illustrations.
Notes:Includes index.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Other title:Front Matter --
The Grammar of the Judicial Dialogue between International Criminal Tribunals and the European Court: Introductory Remarks /
Cross-fertilisation under the Looking Glass: Transjudicial Grammar and Reception of Strasbourg Jurisprudence by International Criminal Tribunals /
‘Directory Authority’: Fertilising International Criminal Tribunals’ Human Rights Standards with European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law /
Judicial Dialogue in Light of Comparative Criminal Law and Justice /
Article 21 (3) of the ICC Statute: Identifying and Applying ‘Internationally Recognized Human Rights’ /
Article 21(3) of the ICC Statute and ‘Internationally Recognized Human Rights’ as a Source of Mandatory Judicial Dialogue /
Beyond Anecdotal Reference: A Quantitative Assessment of ICTY References to the Jurisprudence of the ECtHR /
The Nulla Poena sine Lege Principle: A Symptomatic Sign of Interactions between Strasbourg and The Hague /
Critical Remarks on the Accessibility/Foreseeability Standard as Applied in International Criminal Justice /
The Judicial Dialogue between the ECtHR and the ad hoc Tribunals on the Right to Rehabilitation of Offenders /
Judicial Dialogue and the Definition of Torture: The Importation of ICTs from European Jurisprudence /
Confronting the Divergent Notions of Torture and Other Ill-Treatment under the Rome Statute through the Lens of Cumulative Conviction /
Absent Witnesses and the Right to Confrontation: The Influence of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on International Criminal Law /
The Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Misapplication of the European Court of Human Rights Case Law on Hearsay Evidence and Corroboration: The Taylor Appeal Judgment and the Al Khawaja and Tahery Case /
The Interaction between the International Criminal Court and the European Court of Human Rights—The Right to the Truth for Victims of Serious Violations of Human Rights: The Importation of a New Right? /
Self- or Cross-fertilisation? Referencing ECtHR Jurisprudence to Justify Victim Participation at the ICC /
Index of Subjects.
Summary:Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights offers a critical legal perspective on the manner in which international criminal tribunals select, (re-)interpret and apply the principles and standards formulated by the European Court of Human Rights. A part of the book is devoted to testing the assumption that the current practice of cross-referencing, though widespread, is incoherent in method and erratic in substance. Notable illustrations analysed in the book include the nullum crimen principle, prohibition of torture, hearsay evidence and victims’ rights. Another section of the book seeks to devise a methodologically sound ‘grammar’ of judicial dialogue, focussing on how and when human rights concepts may be transferred into the context of international criminal justice.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:9004313753
Hierarchical level:Monograph
Statement of Responsibility: edited by Paolo Lobba, Triestino Mariniello.