Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice.
This review examines the literature on procedural justice and the fair trial over the past two decades in the People’s Republic of China. Part 1 gives a wide-angle view of the key political events and developments that have shaped the experience of procedural justice and the fair trial in contempora...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Governance and public policy in China |
|---|---|
| VerfasserIn: | |
| : | |
| TeilnehmendeR: | |
| Place / Publishing House: | Leiden, , Boston: : Brill, , 2018. |
| Year of Publication: | 2018 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Brill Research Perspectives.
|
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (92 pages). |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
993582020704498 |
|---|---|
| ctrlnum |
(CKB)4100000006372144 (MiAaPQ)EBC5555040 (nllekb)BRILL9789004386389 (EXLCZ)994100000006372144 |
| collection |
bib_alma |
| record_format |
marc |
| spelling |
Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018. 1 online resource (92 pages). text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Governance and public policy in China Brill research perspectives This review examines the literature on procedural justice and the fair trial over the past two decades in the People’s Republic of China. Part 1 gives a wide-angle view of the key political events and developments that have shaped the experience of procedural justice and the fair trial in contemporary China. It provides a storyline that explains the political environment in which these concepts have developed over time. Part 2 examines how scholars understand the legal structures of the criminal process in relation to China’s political culture. Part 3 presents scholarly views on three enduring problems relating to the fair trial: a presumption of innocence, interrogational torture, and the role of lawyers in the criminal trial process. Procedural justice is a particularly pertinent issue today in China, because Xi Jinping’s yifa zhiguo 依法治国 (governing the nation in accordance with the law) governance platform seeks to embed a greater appreciation for procedural justice in criminal justice decision-making, to correct a politico-legal tradition overwhelmingly focused on substantive justice. Overall, the literature reviewed in this article points to the serious limitations in overcoming the politico-legal barriers to justice reforms that remain intact in the system, despite nearly four decades of constant reform. Front Matter -- Copyright page -- Author Biographies -- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. Criminal procedure China. Criminal justice, Administration of China. Fair trial China. 90-04-38637-8 Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- author. Brill Research Perspectives. |
| language |
English |
| format |
eBook |
| author |
Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- |
| spellingShingle |
Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. Governance and public policy in China Brill research perspectives Front Matter -- Copyright page -- Author Biographies -- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| author_facet |
Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- |
| author_variant |
e n s t enst s t st |
| author_role |
VerfasserIn |
| author2 |
Trevaskes, Susan, 1964- |
| author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR |
| author_sort |
Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes |
| title |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_full |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_fullStr |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_auth |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_new |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| title_sort |
procedural justice and the fair trial in contemporary chinese criminal justice. |
| series |
Governance and public policy in China Brill research perspectives |
| series2 |
Governance and public policy in China Brill research perspectives |
| publisher |
Brill, |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| physical |
1 online resource (92 pages). |
| contents |
Front Matter -- Copyright page -- Author Biographies -- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| isbn |
90-04-38638-6 90-04-38637-8 |
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| callnumber-label |
KNQ4610 |
| callnumber-sort |
KNQ 44610 N47 42018 |
| geographic_facet |
China. |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-tens |
340 - Law |
| dewey-ones |
345 - Criminal law |
| dewey-full |
345.5105 |
| dewey-sort |
3345.5105 |
| dewey-raw |
345.5105 |
| dewey-search |
345.5105 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT elisanesossisusantrevaskes proceduraljusticeandthefairtrialincontemporarychinesecriminaljustice AT trevaskessusan proceduraljusticeandthefairtrialincontemporarychinesecriminaljustice |
| status_str |
c |
| ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4100000006372144 (MiAaPQ)EBC5555040 (nllekb)BRILL9789004386389 (EXLCZ)994100000006372144 |
| carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Governance and public policy in China Brill research perspectives |
| is_hierarchy_title |
Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice. |
| container_title |
Governance and public policy in China |
| author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField |
| _version_ |
1796652773805129728 |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02871cam a2200433Ii 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993582020704498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230814224239.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr cnu||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181023s2018 ne od eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">90-04-38638-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1163/9789004386389</subfield><subfield code="2">DOI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4100000006372144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(MiAaPQ)EBC5555040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(nllekb)BRILL9789004386389</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994100000006372144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="c">NL-LeKB</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">a-cc---</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">KNQ4610</subfield><subfield code="b">.N47 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">JPQB</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POL040000</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.5105</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1="3" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden, </subfield><subfield code="a">Boston: </subfield><subfield code="b">Brill, </subfield><subfield code="c">2018.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (92 pages).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Governance and public policy in China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brill research perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This review examines the literature on procedural justice and the fair trial over the past two decades in the People’s Republic of China. Part 1 gives a wide-angle view of the key political events and developments that have shaped the experience of procedural justice and the fair trial in contemporary China. It provides a storyline that explains the political environment in which these concepts have developed over time. Part 2 examines how scholars understand the legal structures of the criminal process in relation to China’s political culture. Part 3 presents scholarly views on three enduring problems relating to the fair trial: a presumption of innocence, interrogational torture, and the role of lawyers in the criminal trial process. Procedural justice is a particularly pertinent issue today in China, because Xi Jinping’s yifa zhiguo 依法治国 (governing the nation in accordance with the law) governance platform seeks to embed a greater appreciation for procedural justice in criminal justice decision-making, to correct a politico-legal tradition overwhelmingly focused on substantive justice. Overall, the literature reviewed in this article points to the serious limitations in overcoming the politico-legal barriers to justice reforms that remain intact in the system, despite nearly four decades of constant reform.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Front Matter -- Copyright page -- Author Biographies -- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal procedure</subfield><subfield code="z">China.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal justice, Administration of</subfield><subfield code="z">China.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fair trial</subfield><subfield code="z">China.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">90-04-38637-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trevaskes, Susan,</subfield><subfield code="d">1964-</subfield><subfield code="e">author.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Brill Research Perspectives.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-08-16 00:51:20 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2018-09-01 19:45:54 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">Brill</subfield><subfield code="P">EBA Brill All</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5343155060004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5343155060004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5343155060004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |