Chapter Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age
Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the...
Saved in:
| Superior document: | Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments |
|---|---|
| : | |
| Year of Publication: | 2021 |
| Language: | English |
| Series: | Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
|
| Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (18 p.) |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| LEADER | 01767nam-a2200373z--4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 993562548904498 | ||
| 005 | 20230221124414.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 202206s2021 xx |||||o ||| eneng d | ||
| 035 | |a (CKB)5840000000035929 | ||
| 035 | |a (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/82790 | ||
| 035 | |a (EXLCZ)995840000000035929 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Fuentes Bravo, Claudio |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age |
| 246 | |a Chapter «Odyssey» Scientific Debate | ||
| 246 | |a Competing, cooperating, deciding | ||
| 246 | |a Chapter «Odyssey» Scientific Debate | ||
| 246 | |a Chapter Improving Argumentative Skills in Education | ||
| 246 | |a Chapter Online Critical Debate Model | ||
| 260 | |a Florence |b Firenze University Press |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (18 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments | |
| 520 | |a Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented. | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 653 | |a Online Debate | ||
| 653 | |a Deliberative Debate | ||
| 653 | |a Critical Debate Model | ||
| 776 | |z 88-5518-329-X | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Goñi Jerez, Julián |4 auth | |
| 906 | |a BOOK | ||
| ADM | |b 2023-03-03 02:07:18 Europe/Vienna |f system |c marc21 |a 2022-06-08 16:08:14 Europe/Vienna |g false | ||
| AVE | |P DOAB Directory of Open Access Books |x https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5337855760004498&Force_direct=true |Z 5337855760004498 |8 5337855760004498 | ||