Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / / edited by Arndt Büssing.
Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily an...
Saved in:
TeilnehmendeR: | |
---|---|
Place / Publishing House: | Basel, Switzerland : : MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,, 2019. ©2019 |
Year of Publication: | 2019 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (148 pages) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993562234804498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)4920000000094771 (NjHacI)994920000000094771 (EXLCZ)994920000000094771 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / edited by Arndt Büssing. Basel, Switzerland : MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2019. ©2019 1 online resource (148 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Description based on: online resource; title from PDF information screen (mdpi.com, viewed February 17, 2023). Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily answered with the instruments designed for previous questions. The field is expanding and, consequently, the research topics. Meanwhile several multidimensional instruments were developed which cover existential, prosocial, religious and non-religious forms of spirituality, hope, peace and trust-and several more. The 'disadvantage' of these instruments is the fact that some are conceptually broad and often rather unspecific, but they might be suited quite well for culturally and spiritually diverse populations when the intention is to compare such diverse groups. This is the reason why more research on new instruments is needed as can be found in this Special Issue, and to stimulate a critical debate about their pros and cons. Includes bibliographical references and index. Religion and science. 3-03897-758-6 Büssing, Arndt, editor. |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author2 |
Büssing, Arndt, |
author_facet |
Büssing, Arndt, |
author2_variant |
a b ab |
author2_role |
TeilnehmendeR |
title |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / |
spellingShingle |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / |
title_full |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / edited by Arndt Büssing. |
title_fullStr |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / edited by Arndt Büssing. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / edited by Arndt Büssing. |
title_auth |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / |
title_new |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / |
title_sort |
measures of spirituality/religiosity-description of concepts and validation of instruments / |
publisher |
MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, |
publishDate |
2019 |
physical |
1 online resource (148 pages) |
isbn |
3-03897-758-6 |
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-subject |
BL - Religions, Mythology, Rationalism |
callnumber-label |
BL240 |
callnumber-sort |
BL 3240.3 M437 520109 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
dewey-hundreds |
200 - Religion |
dewey-tens |
260 - Christian organization, social work & worship |
dewey-ones |
261 - Social theology |
dewey-full |
261.55 |
dewey-sort |
3261.55 |
dewey-raw |
261.55 |
dewey-search |
261.55 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bussingarndt measuresofspiritualityreligiositydescriptionofconceptsandvalidationofinstruments |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)4920000000094771 (NjHacI)994920000000094771 (EXLCZ)994920000000094771 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments / |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1764986253767344129 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02201nam a2200325 i 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993562234804498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230218145008.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230218s2019 sz ob 001 0 eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)4920000000094771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(NjHacI)994920000000094771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)994920000000094771</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">NjHacI</subfield><subfield code="b">eng</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield><subfield code="c">NjHacl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">BL240.3</subfield><subfield code="b">.M437 20109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">261.55</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments /</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Arndt Büssing.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Basel, Switzerland :</subfield><subfield code="b">MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,</subfield><subfield code="c">2019.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (148 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="588" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on: online resource; title from PDF information screen (mdpi.com, viewed February 17, 2023).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily answered with the instruments designed for previous questions. The field is expanding and, consequently, the research topics. Meanwhile several multidimensional instruments were developed which cover existential, prosocial, religious and non-religious forms of spirituality, hope, peace and trust-and several more. The 'disadvantage' of these instruments is the fact that some are conceptually broad and often rather unspecific, but they might be suited quite well for culturally and spiritually diverse populations when the intention is to compare such diverse groups. This is the reason why more research on new instruments is needed as can be found in this Special Issue, and to stimulate a critical debate about their pros and cons.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Religion and science.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-03897-758-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Büssing, Arndt,</subfield><subfield code="e">editor.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-03-01 00:30:34 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2019-11-10 04:18:40 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5338014190004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5338014190004498</subfield><subfield code="8">5338014190004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |