Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity
As is known, an objective assessment of scientific activity is one of the most difficult problems, in terms of the relationship within itself as well as with society. However, for many decades, the significance of scientists’ contribution to the development of the corresponding branch of science was...
Saved in:
Sonstige: | |
---|---|
Year of Publication: | 2022 |
Language: | English |
Physical Description: | 1 electronic resource (128 p.) |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
993560441004498 |
---|---|
ctrlnum |
(CKB)5680000000080782 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/92095 (EXLCZ)995680000000080782 |
collection |
bib_alma |
record_format |
marc |
spelling |
Mikhailov, Oleg V. edt Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity Basel MDPI Books 2022 1 electronic resource (128 p.) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier As is known, an objective assessment of scientific activity is one of the most difficult problems, in terms of the relationship within itself as well as with society. However, for many decades, the significance of scientists’ contribution to the development of the corresponding branch of science was assessed by the scientific community only by meaningful qualitative criteria, wherein the principle and mechanism of such an assessment was actually intuitive and defied quantitative description. That is why the urgent task was undertaken to create a system for evaluating scientific activity based on some objective indicators of the activity of a particular scientist; in search of such criteria, in the 1970s–1980s, the term “citation index” appeared. Although a close examination of this indicator revealed its limitations and in a number of cases even inadequacy in assessing scientific activity, it has nevertheless since the 1990s gained very wide popularity in the scientific community. This has contributed to the emergence of numerous works aimed at finding new and ideal indicators for assessing publication activity (so-called bibliometric indices). To date, several dozen such indices have been proposed, the most significant of which was the so-called Hirsch index or h-index. Nevertheless, despite the incredibly significant advances in this specific area of sociology, the above problem is still far from resolved. In this regard, the key task of this Special Issue is to familiarize its readers with the latest achievements both in the search for new, more advanced bibliometric indicators and in the improvement of existing ones. English Humanities bicssc Social interaction bicssc conference indicator conference impact factor conference accreditation bibliometric measure scientometrics scientometric indicators Russian professors sociological polls scientometric politics scientometric indexes scholarly publications scientific contribution of individual author-suggested weighted citation index bibliometric human capital universities trends higher education citation analysis emerging country Kazakhstan Lotka's law network analysis publication trend research productivity scientific activity technology assessment research collaboration patent analysis bibliometric indicators sustainable development goals systematic review meta-analysis academic surgery 3-0365-4831-9 3-0365-4832-7 Mikhailov, Oleg V. oth |
language |
English |
format |
eBook |
author2 |
Mikhailov, Oleg V. |
author_facet |
Mikhailov, Oleg V. |
author2_variant |
o v m ov ovm |
author2_role |
Sonstige |
title |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
spellingShingle |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_full |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_fullStr |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_auth |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_new |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
title_sort |
modern problems of scientometric assessment of publication activity |
publisher |
MDPI Books |
publishDate |
2022 |
physical |
1 electronic resource (128 p.) |
isbn |
3-0365-4831-9 3-0365-4832-7 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mikhailovolegv modernproblemsofscientometricassessmentofpublicationactivity |
status_str |
n |
ids_txt_mv |
(CKB)5680000000080782 (oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/92095 (EXLCZ)995680000000080782 |
carrierType_str_mv |
cr |
is_hierarchy_title |
Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity |
author2_original_writing_str_mv |
noLinkedField |
_version_ |
1787548693388328961 |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03810nam-a2200709z--4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">993560441004498</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231214133350.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m o d </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|mn|---annan</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">202209s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(CKB)5680000000080782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/92095</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(EXLCZ)995680000000080782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mikhailov, Oleg V.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modern Problems of Scientometric Assessment of Publication Activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Basel</subfield><subfield code="b">MDPI Books</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 electronic resource (128 p.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">computer</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">online resource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As is known, an objective assessment of scientific activity is one of the most difficult problems, in terms of the relationship within itself as well as with society. However, for many decades, the significance of scientists’ contribution to the development of the corresponding branch of science was assessed by the scientific community only by meaningful qualitative criteria, wherein the principle and mechanism of such an assessment was actually intuitive and defied quantitative description. That is why the urgent task was undertaken to create a system for evaluating scientific activity based on some objective indicators of the activity of a particular scientist; in search of such criteria, in the 1970s–1980s, the term “citation index” appeared. Although a close examination of this indicator revealed its limitations and in a number of cases even inadequacy in assessing scientific activity, it has nevertheless since the 1990s gained very wide popularity in the scientific community. This has contributed to the emergence of numerous works aimed at finding new and ideal indicators for assessing publication activity (so-called bibliometric indices). To date, several dozen such indices have been proposed, the most significant of which was the so-called Hirsch index or h-index. Nevertheless, despite the incredibly significant advances in this specific area of sociology, the above problem is still far from resolved. In this regard, the key task of this Special Issue is to familiarize its readers with the latest achievements both in the search for new, more advanced bibliometric indicators and in the improvement of existing ones.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Humanities</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Social interaction</subfield><subfield code="2">bicssc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">conference indicator</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">conference impact factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">conference accreditation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bibliometric measure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientometrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientometric indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Russian professors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">sociological polls</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientometric politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientometric indexes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scholarly publications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientific contribution of individual</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">author-suggested weighted citation index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bibliometric</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">human capital</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">universities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">trends</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">higher education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">citation analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">emerging country</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kazakhstan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lotka's law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">network analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">publication trend</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">research productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">scientific activity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">technology assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">research collaboration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">patent analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bibliometric indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">sustainable development goals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">systematic review</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">academic surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-0365-4831-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">3-0365-4832-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mikhailov, Oleg V.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BOOK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="ADM" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">2023-12-15 05:51:40 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="f">system</subfield><subfield code="c">marc21</subfield><subfield code="a">2022-09-22 08:09:39 Europe/Vienna</subfield><subfield code="g">false</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="AVE" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="i">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="P">DOAB Directory of Open Access Books</subfield><subfield code="x">https://eu02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/43ACC_OEAW/openurl?u.ignore_date_coverage=true&portfolio_pid=5340301770004498&Force_direct=true</subfield><subfield code="Z">5340301770004498</subfield><subfield code="b">Available</subfield><subfield code="8">5340301770004498</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |